How to calculate the capacity of a disk

In summary: Is that correct understanding ?Yes, the physical size of the storage medium is not relevant, It only matters what is their capacity to store data.
  • #1
momentum
111
0
A 2.5 inch diameter disk plate has 6 plates , 512 bytes per sector , 256 sectors , 5268 tracks per surface. What is the capacity of the disk in terms of Giga bytes ?

In the solution of my book ..written:

6 plates = 6x2-2 = 10 recording surfaces // I don't understand this part.

Could you please explain this ?

Ans: 6.43 GB
 
Technology news on Phys.org
  • #2
The topmost and bottommost surfaces aren't used so for 6 plates you have 12 surfaces which amounts to 10 usable surfaces.
 
  • Like
Likes stoomart
  • #3
answer given in the book :

Disk capacity = 10x5268x256x512/2^30 = 6.43 GB

what is the relation here in sector and track. ... I see they are multiplied ...I could not get this part
 
  • #4
The tracks are concentric circles on the surface of the disk, in this case there are 5268 of them.
Each track contains discrete chunks of data, these are the sectors, there are 256 sectors per track in this case.
The sectors each have a capacity of 512 bytes; read or write operations are from or to 1 whole such sector at a time,
(even if only part of the 512 bytes contains relevant data).
 
Last edited:
  • #5
rootone said:
Each track contains discrete chunks of data, these are the sectors

not clear. Could you please show me an image to visualize this concept ?

Is not sectors looks like arc in circle ? or sectors lay in concentric circle i.e track ? unable to visualize this part.
 
  • #6
Think of it as a pages in a book.
Each page has a lines, and you can only have so many lines on one page.
and only so many words on one line
 
  • #7
sectors are like words in your example ? :smile:

and lines are tracks ?

Is that correct understanding ?
 
  • #8
momentum said:
sectors are like words in your example ? :smile:

and lines are tracks ?

Is that correct understanding ?
More like sentences, but you got the right idea
 
  • #9
okay ..
momentum said:
A 2.5 inch diameter disk plate

I don't see this being used in solution . Is this a useless information in this problem ?
 
  • #10
Yes, the physical size of the storage medium is not relevant, It only matters what is their capacity to store data.
The earliest hard disk drives were very heavy devices (tens of Kg), they needed to be installed in a whole room by themselves with air cooling,
 
  • #11
rootone said:
Yes, the physical size of the storage medium is not relevant, It only matters what is their capacity to store data.
The earliest hard disk drives were very heavy devices (tens of Kg), they needed to be installed in a whole room by themselves with air cooling,
awesome.

thanks for your time.
 
  • #12
http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/02/18/amazing-facts-and-figures-about-the-evolution-of-hard-disk-drives/

Factoid: A 5 MB hard disk drive from Apple cost $3,500 in 1981. That’s $700,000 per GB.

Inflation adjusted that's almost $2 million per GB.

BoB
 
  • #13
:wink:
 
  • #14
momentum said:
not clear. Could you please show me an image to visualize this concept ?

Is not sectors looks like arc in circle ? or sectors lay in concentric circle i.e track ? unable to visualize this part.
The track is established by the mechanics. Once the read/write heads have been positioned, each head has access to all the information on the track - all 128Kbytes of it.

But 128Kbytes is a pretty large block of storage. To use it efficiently, you want to allow it to be shared among many small files - and you want to be able to write data to one of those files without changing data for the other files. So the track is divided into sectors of a more convenient size. This division is done during disk formatting when special disk instructions are used to write whole tracks with data patterns. Those data patterns are then read during normal read and write operations so that the sectors can be properly recognized and targeted.
 

Related to How to calculate the capacity of a disk

1. What is the formula for calculating the capacity of a disk?

The formula for calculating the capacity of a disk is: Capacity = π * (radius)^2 * height * number of surfaces.

2. How do I determine the radius and height of a disk for the calculation?

The radius and height of a disk can be measured using a ruler or caliper. Alternatively, if you know the diameter of the disk, you can divide it by 2 to get the radius. The height can be measured from the center of the disk to the outer edge.

3. Can the number of surfaces affect the capacity of a disk?

Yes, the number of surfaces can affect the capacity of a disk. If a disk has more than one surface (such as a double-sided disk), the capacity will be doubled because there is twice as much space to store data.

4. How do I convert the capacity of a disk from one unit to another?

To convert the capacity of a disk from one unit to another, you will need to know the conversion factor between the two units. For example, to convert from gigabytes to megabytes, you would multiply the capacity in gigabytes by 1,000.

5. Is there a difference in calculating the capacity of a magnetic disk versus an optical disk?

Yes, there is a difference in calculating the capacity of a magnetic disk (such as a hard drive) versus an optical disk (such as a CD or DVD). Magnetic disks are typically measured in bytes, while optical disks are measured in sectors. Additionally, the formula for calculating the capacity of an optical disk is different and takes into account the size of the sectors and the number of tracks on the disk.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
34
Views
12K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Calculus
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Cosmology
Replies
23
Views
5K
Back
Top