How many dimensions are needed to fully describe the electromagnetic force?

In summary, Maxwell's equations use four dimensions, but it depends on the specific situation and definition of the EM force. For the old Lorenz force, 4D is sufficient, but for more general forces, such as in Stuckelberg theory, a higher number of dimensions is necessary.
  • #1
PatrickPowers
240
1
Maxwell's equations use four dimensions. But wouldn't we need more dimensions to completely describe the EM force. I'm thinking of polarization and twist. So how many mathematical dimensions are necessary for a complete description? That is, how big do the matrices need to be and how many degrees of freedom do they have.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The electromagnetic field is a massless vector field, which means that the free field has two independent physically relevant field degrees of freedom. Of course, spacetime has four dimensions. One could think about fields in higher spacetime dimensions, i.e., look for the unitary representations of the Poincare group in more than four dimensions.
 
  • #3
I'm thinking of polarization and twist.
... are not twist and polarization included in Maxwell's equations? Look how they come about!

Of course, you can represent anything you like in as many dimensions as you like.
Depends what you want to do with it.

@vanhees71: I was kinda interpreting the question to be asking about the minimum number of dimensions needed to completely describe all of E-Mag. I still think that's 4 - though it is possible to do it in any number like you say.

We can also do it in less for specific situations with a lot of symmetry.
 
  • #4
PatrickPowers said:
Maxwell's equations use four dimensions. But wouldn't we need more dimensions to completely describe the EM force. I'm thinking of polarization and twist. So how many mathematical dimensions are necessary for a complete description? That is, how big do the matrices need to be and how many degrees of freedom do they have.

It depends what you mean by «EM force«. If you mean the old Lorenz force, then 4D are enough. If you mean more general forces (e.g. the internal force in a two-body covariant system) then you must go beyond Maxwell and special relativity. For instance the EM forces in Stuckelberg theory are defined in a 8N dimensional phase space. For a two-body system, the force is a function in 16 dimensions.
 
  • #5


I can say that the number of dimensions required to fully describe the electromagnetic force is a topic of ongoing research and debate. While Maxwell's equations do use four dimensions (three spatial dimensions and one time dimension) to describe the behavior of electromagnetic fields, it is understood that there may be additional dimensions necessary to fully capture all aspects of the electromagnetic force.

For example, as you mentioned, polarization and twist are important properties of electromagnetic waves that can be described using additional mathematical dimensions. In fact, theories such as string theory and extra dimensions propose the existence of additional dimensions beyond the four we are familiar with, which could potentially play a role in describing the electromagnetic force.

In terms of the size of matrices and degrees of freedom needed for a complete description, it is difficult to give a specific answer as it would depend on the specific theory or model being used. However, it is safe to say that a complete description of the electromagnetic force would require a significant number of mathematical dimensions and degrees of freedom.

In conclusion, while four dimensions are currently used to describe the electromagnetic force, it is likely that more dimensions will be needed for a complete and comprehensive understanding of this fundamental force. Continued research and advancements in theoretical physics will help us better understand the true nature of the electromagnetic force and the dimensions needed to fully describe it.
 

Related to How many dimensions are needed to fully describe the electromagnetic force?

1. How many dimensions are there for electromagnetic (EM) waves?

Electromagnetic waves have 3 dimensions: length, width, and height. These dimensions are known as the spatial dimensions, and they are necessary for describing the physical properties of EM waves.

2. Are there any other dimensions besides the 3 spatial dimensions for EM waves?

Yes, there is a fourth dimension known as time. Together with the 3 spatial dimensions, time makes up the 4-dimensional spacetime framework that describes the behavior of EM waves.

3. Can EM waves exist in higher dimensions?

Some theories, such as string theory, suggest that there may be more than 4 dimensions. However, in our observable universe, EM waves are only known to exist in the 4-dimensional spacetime framework.

4. How do the dimensions of an EM wave affect its properties?

The dimensions of an EM wave play a crucial role in determining its frequency, wavelength, and speed. These properties are directly related to the spatial dimensions, while the dimension of time affects the wave's propagation and energy.

5. Is it possible to visualize higher dimensions for EM waves?

While we can mathematically describe and study higher dimensions, it is challenging to visualize them as they are beyond our 3-dimensional perception. Scientists use abstract and mathematical models to understand the behavior of EM waves in higher dimensions.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
982
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
840
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top