How Long Can You Avoid a Collision with an Accelerating Dragster?

In summary: It's an intercept of a line with a parabola: the method for finding the x-value of the largest intercept is the same as finding the x-value of the vertex of a parabola.)In summary, the longest time after the dragster begins to accelerate that you can possibly run into the back of the dragster if you continue at your initial velocity is given by the solution to the quadratic equation t = (2v0 - [4(v0)^2 - 8a(s0)]^1/2)/2a, where a is the constant acceleration of the dragster, v0 is the initial velocity of the car, and s0 is the y-intercept of the car's position graph. This
  • #1
aleferesco
28
0

Homework Statement




To demonstrate the tremendous acceleration of a top fuel drag racer, you attempt to run your car into the back of a dragster that is "burning out" at the red light before the start of a race. (Burning out means spinning the tires at high speed to heat the tread and make the rubber sticky.)

You drive at a constant speed of v0 toward the stopped dragster, not slowing down in the face of the imminent collision. The dragster driver sees you coming but waits until the last instant to put down the hammer, accelerating from the starting line at constant acceleration, a . Let the time at which the dragster starts to accelerate be t=0

What is tmax, the longest time after the dragster begins to accelerate that you can possibly run into the back of the dragster if you continue at your initial velocity?


please help me, just get me started . I've look this question from all possible angles but couldn't figure out how to start

Homework Equations



vf = vi +a(delta)t

sf = si +vi(delta)t + 1/2a(delta)t^2

vf^2= vi^2 +2a(delta)s

ps. "s" is position
"V" velocity
"f" final
"i" initial
I use the word delta instead of the little triangle, I don't know how to put it

The Attempt at a Solution



My first attempt was trying to figure out the constant velocity of the car, but the thing is that there's not enough given values in order to solve (or are there enough?)


Am I using the wrong formulas?

Any kind of help is truly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The condition to use is that sf is the same for the car and the dragster. So I'd work with that equation.
 
  • #3
oo true man, thanks I'll give it a shot
 
  • #4
so I gave the question a try and her is what I came up with

Equation for the accelerating dragster

(sf)d = s0 +v0t + 1/2at2

Equation for the car going at a constant velocity

(sf)c = s0 + v0t


then...

(sf)d= (sf)c

1/2at2 = v0t

at2 = 2v0t

at = 2v0

tmax = 2v0/a
 
  • #5
please let me know if it is right or wrong or give me some pointers
 
  • #6
You're on the right track, but there is a detail or two we need to think about more carefully.

aleferesco said:
Equation for the accelerating dragster

(sf)d = s0 +v0t + 1/2at2

Equation for the car going at a constant velocity

(sf)c = s0 + v0t


then...

(sf)d= (sf)c

1/2at2 = v0t

Looks like you're saying v0 is zero for the dragster, and v0 is not zero for the car. That's correct. (It is potentially confusing since you used the same term, v0, for the car and for the dragster.)

It also looks like you're saying s0 is the same for the car and dragster. That would be a problem, since it means they have already collided at t=0.
 
  • #7
so would this be better then

Equation for the accelerating dragster

(sf)d = s0)d +(v0)dt + 1/2at2

Equation for the car going at a constant velocity

(sf)c = (s0)c + (v0)ct


then...

(sf)d= (sf)c

1/2at2 = (s0)c + (v0)t

at2 = 2(v0t + (s0)c)


at2 = 2v0t + 2(s0)c

does it makes more sense now?

or I'm completely off
 
  • #8
Yes, that's correct. Proceed.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
so if what I did was correct then now I have to Isolate for t,

at2 = 2v0t + 2(s0)c

t2 = (2v0t + 2(s0)c)/a

t2 = (2(v0t + (s0)c))/a


t = [(2(v0t + (s0)c))/a]1/2


but my question is, what can I do with the 't' that is inside of the equation

does it seem right?
 
  • #10
By the way, this is not a very "straightforward" problem ... as you might suspect by now.

Note we have a quadratic equation in "t":
a t2 = 2 v0 t + 2 (s0)c

And there is a formula for solving quadratics (think back to high school algebra) ...
 
  • #11
ooo!

0 = at2 - 2v0t - 2(s0)c

t = (2v0t +- [(-2v0)2 - 4(a)(-2(s0)c)]1/2/2a

since time is only positive then... I only take the positive side of the obtained values..

tmax = (2v0t + [4(v0)2 - 8(a)(s0)c)]1/2/2a
 
  • #12
You're getting there.

aleferesco said:
ooo!

0 = at2 - 2v0t - 2(s0)c

t = (2v0t +- [(-2v0)2 - 4(a)(-2(s0)c)]1/2/2a

Get rid of the "t" on the right hand side, it's the variable we're solving for.

since time is only positive then... I only take the positive side of the obtained values..

tmax = (2v0t + [4(v0)2 - 8(a)(s0)c)]1/2/2a

Uh, not so fast.
The minus-sign I've highlighted should be a +. And the "negative" part of the +- doesn't necessarily give a negative time, so we should keep it as +- for now.
 
  • #13
I've (hopefully) thought of a better way to explain what's going on.

A graph of the car's position is a straight line, with slope v0 and unknown y-intercept s0.

A graph of the dragster's position is a parabola, x = (1/2) a t^2

The two graphs can intercept at two values of t, given by the quadratic formula solution for t. A key thing to realize is that the earlier-time (lower t, "-√") solution is when the crash occurs. So take the "-√" solution.

After that, find the value of s0 which gives the largest value of t.
 

Related to How Long Can You Avoid a Collision with an Accelerating Dragster?

1. What is kinematics?

Kinematics is the study of motion, including the position, velocity, and acceleration of objects. It is a branch of physics that focuses on describing the motion of objects without considering the forces that cause the motion.

2. What are the three basic quantities used in kinematics?

The three basic quantities used in kinematics are displacement, velocity, and acceleration. Displacement is the change in position of an object, velocity is the rate of change of displacement, and acceleration is the rate of change of velocity.

3. What is the difference between speed and velocity?

Speed is a scalar quantity that measures the rate of motion, while velocity is a vector quantity that measures both the rate and direction of motion. In other words, velocity takes into account the direction of an object's motion, while speed does not.

4. What is the difference between average and instantaneous velocity?

Average velocity is the total displacement of an object divided by the total time taken, while instantaneous velocity is the velocity of an object at a specific moment in time. Average velocity gives an idea of the overall motion of an object, while instantaneous velocity gives information about the object's motion at a particular instant.

5. How is acceleration related to velocity?

Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity. This means that when an object's velocity changes, it is experiencing acceleration. If an object's velocity is increasing, the acceleration is positive, and if the velocity is decreasing, the acceleration is negative.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
809
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
907
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top