How Fast Did Klaus Spinka Accelerate While Grass Skiing?

  • Thread starter bballgirlweez
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Physics
In summary, the record speed for grass skiing was set in 1985 by Klaus Spinka, of Austria. Spink took 6.6 seconds to reach his top speed after starting from rest down a slope with a 34.0 degree incline. With a coefficient of kinetic friction of .198, his net acceleration was calculated to be -3.87m/s^2. However, due to the nature of terminal velocity, his speed after 6.6 seconds could not be accurately determined unless the percentage of his top speed reached in that time was known.
  • #1
bballgirlweez
6
0
The record speed for grass kiing was set in 1985 by Klaus Spinka, of Austria. Suppose it took Spink 6.6s to reach hs top spped after he started from rest down a slope with a 34.0 degree incline. If teh coefficint of kinetic frction betweent eh skis and the grass was .198, what was the magnitude of Spinka's net acceleration? waht was his speed after 6.60s? :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Please learn to check your spelling, and I think this belongs in the homework help section.

Either way, you should attempt a problem before just posting it (poorly) on a forum, and expecting us to do it for you.
 
  • #3
bballgirlweez said:
The record speed for grass skiing was set in 1985 by Klaus Spinka, of Austria. Suppose it took Spink 6.6s to reach his top speed after he started from rest down a slope with a 34.0 degree incline. If teh coefficint of kinetic frction between the skis and the grass was .198, what was the magnitude of Spinka's net acceleration? what was his speed after 6.60s?

This is a terminal velocity problem, and in an ideal situation, the velocity approaches, but never reaches [tex]v_{max}[/tex] The problem needs to be restated so that Spink took 6.6s to reach a certain percentage of his top speed (like 99.5%, 99%, 98%), and these small changes make a big difference.

Here's a link to terminal velocity formula and it's derviation:

http://www.karlscalculus.org/l12.1.html

I changed the signs for Vmax and acceleration so the formula becomes:

[tex]V(t) = V_{max} (1 - e^{-2at/V_{max}})/(1+e^{-2at/V_{max}})[/tex]

where a is the rate of non-aerodynamic acceleration (negative), t is time, V is velocity (0 or negative) and Vmax is max velocity.

In this case, a is the compenent of gravity - component of friction:

[tex]a = (sin(34)\ g) - (cos(34)\ g\ .198) = -9.8m/s^2\ (.559 - .164) = -3.87m/s^2 [/tex]

However, stuck, at [tex]t = 0[/tex], you end up with

[tex] V(0) = V_{max}*(0)/(2) = 0 [/tex]

and at [tex]t = \infty [/tex] you end up with

[tex] V(\infty) = V_{max}*(1)/(1) = V_{max} [/tex]


So as I orignally stated, you can't reach maximum velocity in any finite amount of time in this idealized case. However, if you knew that a certain percentage of Vmax was reached in 6.6 seconds, you could then solve for Vmax. As this percentage approaches 100%, Vmax approaches 0, aerodynamic drag approaches infinity, and vice versa.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related to How Fast Did Klaus Spinka Accelerate While Grass Skiing?

1. What does the term "crazy" mean in this context?

The term "crazy" is used here to indicate that the physics question is complex or challenging, making it difficult to understand or solve.

2. Can you provide some background information on this physics question?

Unfortunately, without knowing the specific question, it is impossible to provide background information. However, it is likely that the question involves advanced concepts or theories in physics.

3. Why is this question considered "crazy"?

This question is considered "crazy" because it may involve unconventional or abstract concepts, or require a high level of mathematical understanding to solve.

4. Is it possible to solve this question without advanced knowledge in physics?

It depends on the specific question, but in most cases, a strong understanding of physics principles and mathematical skills is necessary to solve the question correctly.

5. How can I approach solving this physics question?

First, make sure you have a solid understanding of the relevant physics principles and concepts. Then, carefully read and analyze the question, breaking it down into smaller, more manageable parts. Finally, use mathematical equations and problem-solving techniques to find a solution.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
4K
Back
Top