How does a physicist view mental phenomenons?

In summary, the conversation discussed the role of modern physics in understanding concepts that are not measurable or detectable, such as will and motivation. The speaker questioned whether these phenomena can be explained through physics or if they should be considered abstract. It was concluded that these questions are better suited for the fields of philosophy and metaphysics, and that they often do not lead to concrete conclusions. The thread was then closed, although it may be reopened if the original poster provides credible sources for further discussion.
  • #1
Pleonasm
322
20
I am curious to know how modern physics stand on things that we cannot detect or measure, yet are very much present and real in everyday lifes such as the will and motivation. Is it reducible to physics even though you could never detect or measure it? Or do you consider them abstract phenomenons?
 
  • Like
Likes amina ltam
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
These questions belong to the field of philosophy and metaphysics which we don't discuss here. Although sometimes prominent physicists as Kaku or Hawking discuss those issues on TV, we have made the experience, that they usually lead to nowhere, esp. to no end or conclusion.

Thread closed.

(Thread will be re-opened if OP provides some sources that can be debated, possibly moved to the medical section then.)
 
Last edited:

Related to How does a physicist view mental phenomenons?

1. How does a physicist define mental phenomenons?

A physicist views mental phenomenons as subjective experiences that occur within the mind, including thoughts, emotions, and perceptions.

2. Do physicists believe that mental phenomenons have a physical basis?

Yes, physicists believe that mental phenomenons are ultimately rooted in the physical processes of the brain.

3. Can mental phenomenons be explained through the laws of physics?

While the laws of physics can provide a framework for understanding the physical processes underlying mental phenomenons, their exact mechanisms may not be fully understood yet.

4. How do physicists approach the study of mental phenomenons?

Physicists use a combination of scientific methods, including experimentation and mathematical modeling, to study the relationship between physical processes in the brain and mental phenomenons.

5. Is there a consensus among physicists about the nature of mental phenomenons?

No, there is not a universal consensus among physicists about the nature of mental phenomenons. Different theories and perspectives exist, and the study of mental phenomenons is a complex and ongoing area of research.

Similar threads

B How do physicists know that the past is immutable?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
1K
How Does Physics Apply to Daily Life and Astrophysics?
    • New Member Introductions
Replies
2
Views
130
Physicists in Industry - Action Needed
    • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
7
Views
1K
Programs What subject is better for an aspiring experimental physicist?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
15
Views
1K
A Game theory, quantum physics and the Bell inequality (paper)
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
865
The Education of a Physicist (1965)
    • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Questions on a numberphile video
    • Topology and Analysis
Replies
5
Views
935
Exploring Mental Blocks in Mathematics: A Personal Perspective
    • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
1K
Physics How to become a Certified Medical Physicist in the UK?
    • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
2
Views
2K
I A Bold New Take on Quantum Theory
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top