How Do Kinetic Energies Vary for Decay Products in Different Frames?

  • Thread starter Astudious
  • Start date
In summary: Okay, so the range of possible values for the kinetic energy of particle A in the lab frame is 0 (if it moves in opposite direction to M) to (1/2)mu2. I still don't see how to do this properly. I mean, if the particle A moves in opposite direction to M, then it's just 0. So why do I need an equation for this?If the particle A moves in the same direction as M, then it has some kinetic energy in the lab frame. Now, I think I can say that it moves at the same velocity as the particle B in the ZMF, but that's still not enough to solve the problem. I don't have any idea how to get the
  • #1
Astudious
61
0

Homework Statement


An unstable particle of mass M = m1 + m2 decays into two particles of masses m1 and m2
releasing an amount of energy Q. Determine the kinetic energies of the two particles in the
ZMF. Given that m1/m2 = 4, Q = 1 MeV, and that the unstable particle is moving in the lab frame with kinetic energy 2.25MeV, find the maximum and minimum kinetic energies of the particle of mass m1 in the lab frame.

Homework Equations


See below

The Attempt at a Solution



Let the particle of mass m1 be A and of mass m2 be B.

For the first part, pA* + pB* = 0 in the zero-momentum frame and so mAEA* = mBEB* where E is the kinetic energy of the particle in the ZMF.

I think the other equation to use is EA* + EB* = Q but I'm not sure how to justify this.

1) Why should the energy released in the decay (in the lab frame) be equal to the sum of energies of the resultant particles in the ZMF?

For the second part, not sure how to start or even why there are a range of possible answers. Seems to me that the kinetic energy of the unstable particle in the lab frame gives directly its velocity in the lab frame, which is thus the velocity of the ZMF; meanwhile, the ZMF kinetic energies of the two particles after the decay can be converted into ZMF velocities. Then we just do vlab = v* + vZMF to find the lab velocities of the two particles. These lab velocities can be converted to lab KEs, done.

2) How is there a range of kinetic energies of A possible, for the second part? How should I do it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Astudious said:

Homework Statement


An unstable particle of mass M = m1 + m2 decays into two particles of masses m1 and m2
releasing an amount of energy Q. Determine the kinetic energies of the two particles in the
ZMF. Given that m1/m2 = 4, Q = 1 MeV, and that the unstable particle is moving in the lab frame with kinetic energy 2.25MeV, find the maximum and minimum kinetic energies of the particle of mass m1 in the lab frame.

Homework Equations


See below

The Attempt at a Solution



Let the particle of mass m1 be A and of mass m2 be B.

For the first part, pA* + pB* = 0 in the zero-momentum frame and so mAEA* = mBEB* where E is the kinetic energy of the particle in the ZMF.

I think the other equation to use is EA* + EB* = Q but I'm not sure how to justify this.

1) Why should the energy released in the decay (in the lab frame) be equal to the sum of energies of the resultant particles in the ZMF?

For the second part, not sure how to start or even why there are a range of possible answers. Seems to me that the kinetic energy of the unstable particle in the lab frame gives directly its velocity in the lab frame, which is thus the velocity of the ZMF; meanwhile, the ZMF kinetic energies of the two particles after the decay can be converted into ZMF velocities. Then we just do vlab = v* + vZMF to find the lab velocities of the two particles. These lab velocities can be converted to lab KEs, done.

2) How is there a range of kinetic energies of A possible, for the second part? How should I do it?
Does the problem statement really say ##M = m_1 + m_2##? I ask because it's inconsistent with the rest of the problem statement.

Conservation of energy says that the total energy before the decay is equal to the total energy after the decay. Before the decay in the ZMF, the total energy is just ##Mc^2## because the particle is at rest. What makes up the total energy after the decay? Figure that out and set it equal to ##Mc^2##.

As far as why you get a range of kinetic energies, you have to consider the direction of the particles in the ZMF and how that affects the results in the lab frame. Also, velocities don't add the way you think they do. You're using Galilean relativity; it works differently in special relativity when speeds are comparable to the speed of light.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
vela said:
Does the problem statement really say ##M = m_1 + m_2##? I ask because it's inconsistent with the rest of the problem statement.
...
Also, velocities don't add the way you think they do. You're using Galilean relativity; it works differently in special relativity when speeds are comparable to the speed of light.

I'm fairly certain this problem is not one in which we are expected to use special relativity. The problem does say ##M = m_1 + m_2## and I would really think it is a standard Galilean-relativity momentum problem. Of course I would be happy to learn how to generalize into special-relativity the solution of this but first I'd like to do it the "normal" way (Galilean relativity).

vela said:
Conservation of energy says that the total energy before the decay is equal to the total energy after the decay. Before the decay in the ZMF, the total energy is just ##Mc^2## because the particle is at rest. What makes up the total energy after the decay? Figure that out and set it equal to ##Mc^2##.

Q energy is released, in addition to which you have ##(\gamma_1-1)m_1c^2 + (\gamma_2-1)m_2c^2## from the two particles A and B. That's in special relativity anyway. Here I'd think we just have

Q + (1/2)m1vA2 + (1/2)m2vB2 = (1/2)(m1+m2)u2

where u is the initial velocity of M in the lab frame. We need to use the lab-frame for this equation because Q is presumably measured in the lab frame. But this is not at all the same equation as (1/2)m1vA2* + (1/2)m2vB2* = Q, where * represents ZMF velocities, which is what we need to use for the first part (according to the solutions).

vela said:
As far as why you get a range of kinetic energies, you have to consider the direction of the particles in the ZMF and how that affects the results in the lab frame.

Can you explain how I should do this, and what is wrong with my reasoning in the OP regarding the second part?
 
  • #4
The way I would interpret it is that Q is the energy released as measured in the center-of-mass frame.

As I said earlier, you don't seem to be considering the direction that particle A moves. ##\lvert \vec{v}_\text{A} + \vec{v}_\text{zmf} \rvert^2## depends on the angle between ##\vec{v}_\text{A}## and ##\vec{v}_\text{zmf}##.
 
  • #5
vela said:
The way I would interpret it is that Q is the energy released as measured in the center-of-mass frame.

I see. Then, the first part makes sense (as initial kinetic energy is 0 in the zero-momentum frame, as it moves along with the particle).

vela said:
As I said earlier, you don't seem to be considering the direction that particle A moves. ##\lvert \vec{v}_\text{A} + \vec{v}_\text{zmf} \rvert^2## depends on the angle between ##\vec{v}_\text{A}## and ##\vec{v}_\text{zmf}##.

Ah I see. So the problem is in the line: "the ZMF kinetic energies of the two particles after the decay can be converted into ZMF velocities". The kinetic energies can only be converted into magnitudes of velocity and thus do not consider the directions the velocities could take.

Can you outline how I might go about solving this then?
 

Related to How Do Kinetic Energies Vary for Decay Products in Different Frames?

1. What is the Collision/Decay Problem?

The Collision/Decay Problem is a concept in physics that refers to the behavior of particles when they collide with each other. It is also known as the "two-body problem" and is a fundamental issue in understanding the dynamics of the universe.

2. Why is the Collision/Decay Problem important?

The Collision/Decay Problem is important because it helps scientists understand the behavior of particles and how they interact with each other. This understanding is crucial in fields such as particle physics, cosmology, and astrophysics.

3. What factors affect the outcome of a collision/decay?

Several factors can affect the outcome of a collision/decay, including the type of particles involved, their mass and energy, and the angle and velocity at which they collide. Other factors such as electromagnetic forces and the presence of other particles in the environment can also play a role.

4. How do scientists study the Collision/Decay Problem?

Scientists use a variety of experimental techniques and mathematical models to study the Collision/Decay Problem. These include particle accelerators, computer simulations, and theoretical calculations. By analyzing the data from these experiments and simulations, scientists can gain a better understanding of the behavior of particles during collisions and decays.

5. What are some real-life applications of the Collision/Decay Problem?

The Collision/Decay Problem has many real-life applications, including in medical imaging techniques like PET scans, which use the principles of particle collisions to produce images of the human body. It also plays a crucial role in the development of new technologies, such as fusion reactors, which aim to recreate the conditions of particle collisions to produce clean energy.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
317
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
967
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top