Hey guise, Question about how antennas detect electromagnetic waves?

In summary, the conversation discusses the differences between radio waves and light waves, particularly in terms of how they interact with matter and create currents. The concept of "collapse" in quantum mechanics is also explored and compared in relation to the two types of waves. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to approach understanding optics by starting with classical electrodynamics and then incorporating quantum mechanics.
  • #1
Jarfi
384
12
Yer.. I'm lazy and tired, did not enough research and found out that the radio/electromagnetic wave makes all the electrons move back and forth when the wave oscillates between the magnetic and electric fields... so you can see how much the current oscillates etc.

But... um cameras work differently, the wave collapses so you get one signal of a wave and colour, much simpler... what about quantum mechanics, don't the large wavelengths collapse as much?


Well in general I don't know well enough how long wavelength EM-waves are detected, I've seen those pics from deep space where they detected intergalatic radiation.

Anybody care to explain? or give links, names of phenemonas etc? I'm curios I NEED to know this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Jarfi said:
Yer.. I'm lazy and tired, did not enough research and found out that the radio/electromagnetic wave makes all the electrons move back and forth when the wave oscillates between the magnetic and electric fields... so you can see how much the current oscillates etc.

In order for the electrons to move back and forth, they have to absorb a large number of radio photons. However, there are so many photons in the "radio wave" that the absorption of one or two photons doesn't affect the wave as much. The radio wave changes, but it isn't really a "collapse".

The word "collapse" is accurate only for waves that contain only one particle. If the wave has a sufficiently large amplitude, there are many particles associated with that wave. So the disappearance of one photon in the wave doesn't change the wave in a catastrophic manner.

Jarfi said:
But... um cameras work differently,
No they don't. Not really. The film is exposed by chemical reactions. However, chemical reactions involve electric currents on an atomic and molecular level. The formation of chemical bonds involves electric currents of small spatial extent.

One can get a small amount of distance into this by considering chemical bonds as a type of antennae. I mean, there are differences due to the difference in scale. However, there is a correspondence between the rules of photochemistry and the rules of induction.

In silver nitride crystals, there is a threshold in photon number required before the silver is oxidized. It takes about 10 photons absorbed before a particle of silver nitride changes color. So really, the "collapse" is divided between at least 10 photons. This means that in terms of the electromagnetic field, the photochemical process in standard film can be considered "classical". Quantum mechanics is somewhat involved in modelling the energy levels of the electrons in the silver nitride particles.

Jarfi said:
the wave collapses so you get one signal of a wave and colour, much simpler... what about quantum mechanics, don't the large wavelengths collapse as much?
As a heuristic condition, assume that the threshold energy for detection is about the same in antennae and film. The smaller the frequency, the less energy each photon has. Therefore, there smaller the frequency the more photons there are associated with that small amount of threshold energy.

Radio waves have a smaller energy than light waves. Therefore, radio waves have more photons per unit amount of total energy. Therefore, the "collapse" of anyone photon is less noticeable in radio wave antennae than in light wave film.



Jarfi said:
Well in general I don't know well enough how long wavelength EM-waves are detected, I've seen those pics from deep space where they detected intergalatic radiation.

Anybody care to explain? or give links, names of phenemonas etc? I'm curios I NEED to know this.

I suggest that you try going the other way. Try to look for explanations in "classical electrodynamics" for understanding "optics". Try thinking in classical terms first, and then modifying your thinking to take quantum mechanics into account.

For instance, start thinking of chemical bonds as being like radio wave antennae. Then, add a few changes to your picture to include the effect of photons.
 
  • #3
Jarfi said:
But... um cameras work differently, the wave collapses so you get one signal of a wave and colour, much simpler... what about quantum mechanics, don't the large wavelengths collapse as much?

Digital cameras work by absorbing energy from EM waves, just like antennas do. The difference is that the wavelength is so small and the energy is so high that instead of getting an AC current, we can get single electrons being knocked around by single photons. Sensors in digital cameras manipulate this to make the electrons get knocked out of one "layer" of the sensor and into another one where it is captured and later measured. The more electrons, the brighter that particular pixel is. Color images are created by putting filters in front of the sensor or even each individual pixel. Typical color cameras have a Bayer Array, which are RGB filters over each pixel. The software in the camera or on your computer can take the raw data, and knowing the pattern of the Bayer Array, convert the image to color.

Also, don't try to mix classical and quantum physics or you will confuse yourself. The EM wave never collapses, as it is not a QM wavefunction.
 
  • #4
Im still not sure about, how the radio wave creates the current. I am guessing it flies trough the antenna, a certain number of photons in the wave collapse on metals making electrons jump creating current? Or can it create the current without collapsing, and how?

Im currently reading quantum electrodynamics by feynman, and am hoping for some answer... classical physics tend to bore me a bit, at least in school... they treat us like memorizing robots
 
  • #5
Jarfi said:
Im still not sure about, how the radio wave creates the current. I am guessing it flies trough the antenna, a certain number of photons in the wave collapse on metals making electrons jump creating current? Or can it create the current without collapsing, and how?

Don't try to mix classic and quantum physics. Just think about it as an EM wave that induces a current.
 
  • #6
Drakkith said:
Don't try to mix classic and quantum physics. Just think about it as an EM wave that induces a current.

Well... all I'm saying is that atoms are quantum mechanical, collapse of photons too? I can't see how else it functions. And how they detect ultra low energy-wavelengths. That is intergalatic radiation, since the energy is too little to cause an electron to jump from an atom in a single low energy wave.

But thanks for the input tho
 

Related to Hey guise, Question about how antennas detect electromagnetic waves?

1. How do antennas detect electromagnetic waves?

Antennas detect electromagnetic waves by using conductive materials to convert the waves into electrical signals. These signals are then amplified and processed by electronic circuits to produce a usable output.

2. What types of antennas are commonly used to detect electromagnetic waves?

There are various types of antennas that can be used to detect electromagnetic waves, including dipole antennas, monopole antennas, patch antennas, and helical antennas. The type of antenna used depends on the specific application and frequency range.

3. Can antennas detect all types of electromagnetic waves?

No, antennas are designed to detect specific ranges of frequencies. Some antennas are designed to detect only radio waves, while others can detect a wider range of frequencies including microwaves and even light waves.

4. How do antennas receive information from electromagnetic waves?

When an electromagnetic wave passes through an antenna, it induces an electrical current in the antenna's conductive material. This current is then processed by electronic circuits to generate a usable output, such as a radio signal or data transmission.

5. Can antennas be used for both transmitting and receiving electromagnetic waves?

Yes, many antennas are designed to be used for both transmitting and receiving electromagnetic waves. For example, a cell phone antenna both transmits and receives signals for communication. However, some antennas are designed specifically for either transmitting or receiving, depending on their application.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
2
Replies
56
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
927
Replies
10
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
692
Back
Top