Gravity assist mimicking elastic collision

In summary, the satellite with a mass of 252 kg approaches a large planet at a speed vi,1 = 12.3 km/s. The planet is moving at a speed vi,2 = 11.3 km/s in the opposite direction. The satellite partially orbits the planet and then moves away from the planet in a direction opposite to its original direction. If this interaction is assumed to approximate an elastic collision in one dimension, the speed of the satellite after the collision is 34.9 km/s.
  • #1
NJJ289
18
0

Homework Statement

A satellite with a mass of 252 kg approaches a large planet at a speed vi,1 = 12.3 km/s. The planet is moving at a speed vi,2 = 11.3 km/s in the opposite direction. The satellite partially orbits the planet and then moves away from the planet in a direction opposite to its original direction (see the figure). If this interaction is assumed to approximate an elastic collision in one dimension, what is the speed of the satellite after the collision?

The answer is 34.9 km/s.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I think the key words here are "elastic collision." Kinetic energy will therefore be conserved, as should momentum.

I don't understand how to approach the problem since I have no information about the final momentums/velocities of either object. I can't imagine the satellite changing the velocity of the planet to any consequential amount, but using the same velocity (11.3 km/s) for its initial and final states will only result in the satellite having the same initial and final velocities (in opposite directions).

The satellite changes direction so I tried

M1V1+M2V2=M1fV1f+M2V2

252(12.3)+M(11.3)=252(-v)+M(11.3)

which again suggests that vf=-12.3

any assistance much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
When one mass is very (very) much larger than the other (as in planet vs spacecraft ), an elastic collision ends up reflecting the smaller body's velocity (like bouncing off a stationary wall), plus adding its own velocity to the craft.
 
  • #3
Ahhh... that makes sense!

I've redone the problem without the assumption that the planet's final velocity is the same and here's what I got (after a good deal of algebra):

conservation of energy:

Mp(63.848-Vp2)=126V2-19062.5

and for conservation of momentum:

Mp(11.3-Vp)=252V+3099.6

where Mp=mass of planet, Vp=planet's final velocity and V=satellites final velocity


I can't get the two formulas to cancel the unkowns (Mp and Vp) out. Have any ideas?
 
  • #4
I must apologize, but I find it hard to follow numbers in a derivation when I haven't done it myself. They don't jump out at me with significance.

I think that my approach to the problem (and I haven't worked it though myself, so be warned!) might be to think of shifting it to the center of momentum frame by adding a suitable velocity to both of the given velocities so that the momenta of the planet and the spacecraft would be equal and opposite (!yes, equal!) Then the result of "collision" in that frame would be a perfect bounce, with their velocities simply being negated (this is a characteristic of an elastic collision where the momenta of the participants is equal and opposite).

Converting back to the original frame of reference would yield the resulting final velocities. The trick then would be in looking at the 'adjustment' velocity that was used to shift to the center of momentum frame. If the mass of the planet is vastly greater than that of the spacecraft , it should simply be the negative of the planet's velocity (so the planet becomes essentially stationary in the center of momentum frame, which makes sense since it has just about all of the momentum). So to shift to the center of momentum frame we basically subtract the velocity of the planet from each body. Note that because the spacecraft is traveling in the opposite direction to the planet, it adds the planets speed to that of the spacecraft .

When the 'bounce' occurs, the spacecraft retreats at its new improved speed.

Shifting back to the original frame of reference, the planet resumes (essentially) its original speed and the spacecraft speed gets adjusted accordingly with another addition of the speed of the planet.

So in the end, the spacecraft 's seed is equal to its original speed plus twice that of the planet!
 
  • #5


I would like to clarify that the concept of a "gravity assist mimicking elastic collision" is not entirely accurate. A gravity assist, also known as a slingshot maneuver, is a technique used in spaceflight to gain speed and change the direction of a spacecraft by using the gravitational pull of a celestial body. It is not a true elastic collision, as there is no physical contact between the two objects.

That being said, in this problem, we can use the concept of conservation of momentum and kinetic energy to solve for the final velocity of the satellite after the interaction with the planet. We know that the total momentum of the system (satellite + planet) before the interaction is equal to the total momentum after the interaction. This means that:

M1V1 + M2V2 = M1V1f + M2V2f

Where M1 and M2 are the masses of the satellite and planet, respectively, V1 and V2 are their initial velocities, and V1f and V2f are their final velocities. We also know that the total kinetic energy of the system is conserved, so we can write:

1/2M1V1^2 + 1/2M2V2^2 = 1/2M1V1f^2 + 1/2M2V2f^2

Substituting the given values, we get:

1/2(252)(12.3)^2 + 1/2M2(11.3)^2 = 1/2(252)V1f^2 + 1/2M2V2f^2

Solving for M2V2f, we get:

M2V2f = 1/2(252)(12.3)^2 + 1/2M2(11.3)^2 - 1/2(252)V1f^2

Plugging in the given values, we get:

M2V2f = 15408.45 - 1/2(252)V1f^2

Now, we also know that the satellite partially orbits the planet, which means that its final velocity will be in the opposite direction to its initial velocity. This means that V1f = -V1. Substituting this into the equation above, we get:

M2V2f = 15408.45 - 1/2
 

Related to Gravity assist mimicking elastic collision

1. What is a gravity assist mimicking elastic collision?

A gravity assist mimicking elastic collision is a technique used in space missions to change the trajectory of a spacecraft by utilizing the gravitational pull of a planet or other celestial body. The spacecraft approaches the planet at a specific angle and speed, allowing it to use the planet's gravity to increase its speed and change its direction, similar to a billiard ball bouncing off a wall.

2. How does a gravity assist mimicking elastic collision work?

During a gravity assist mimicking elastic collision, the spacecraft passes close to a planet or other celestial body at a specific angle and speed. As it approaches, the planet's gravity pulls on the spacecraft, increasing its speed. The spacecraft then continues on its new trajectory, influenced by the planet's gravitational pull. This technique allows spacecraft to conserve fuel and travel further distances in space.

3. What are the benefits of using a gravity assist mimicking elastic collision?

The main benefit of using a gravity assist mimicking elastic collision is the ability to conserve fuel and energy. By utilizing a planet's gravity, a spacecraft can gain speed and change direction without expending its own energy. This allows for longer and more complex space missions, as well as the ability to explore farther reaches of the solar system.

4. Are there any risks or drawbacks to using a gravity assist mimicking elastic collision?

There are some risks associated with using a gravity assist mimicking elastic collision. If the angle or speed of approach is not calculated correctly, the spacecraft could collide with the planet or be flung off into space. Additionally, the gravitational pull of the planet could alter the trajectory of the spacecraft, potentially affecting its mission objectives. However, with careful planning and precise calculations, these risks can be minimized.

5. What are some real-life examples of gravity assist mimicking elastic collisions?

Gravity assist mimicking elastic collisions have been used in numerous space missions, including the Voyager 1 and 2 missions to the outer planets of our solar system, the Cassini mission to Saturn, and the New Horizons mission to Pluto. These missions have successfully utilized gravity assists to conserve fuel and reach their destinations, providing valuable data and insights about our solar system.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top