Gravitational Waves Vs. Aether Wind

In summary, the success of the Michelson-Morley Experiment is being used as evidence for something very different from what it would have, so long ago, proven a completely different theory. The reason for this is that the signals observed by LIGO are completely different. There is no way that the fluctuations observed by LIGO could be explained by an ether wind.
  • #1
ScientificMind
48
1
The Michelson-Morley Experiment (as depicted in the scishow YouTube video "The Greatest Failed Experiment Ever") which was used to test for the effects of 'Aether Wind' appears to be almost, if not completely, the same setup as the one used in a gravitational-wave observatory. Why is the success of the experiment now used as evidence for something very different from what it would have, so long ago, proven a completely different theory? How can we be sure that this doesn't just mean that there is an aether but our tools were incapable of measuring it back then, instead of verifying Einstein's theories?

For reference, this is the video describing The Michelson-Morley Experiment:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The signals are completely different.
 
  • #3
ScientificMind said:
appears to be almost, if not completely, the same setup
That's because interferometers are the most accurate way of measuring both small changes in speed and small changes in distance. Thus, you shouldn't be surprised to find them in experiments that depend on either kind of measurement.

But as Orodruin says, the type of signal is completely different. There's no way that the fluctuations observed by LIGO could be explained by an ether wind.
 
  • #4
ScientificMind said:
The Michelson-Morley Experiment (as depicted in the scishow YouTube video "The Greatest Failed Experiment Ever") which was used to test for the effects of 'Aether Wind' appears to be almost, if not completely, the same setup as the one used in a gravitational-wave observatory. Why is the success of the experiment now used as evidence for something very different from what it would have, so long ago, proven a completely different theory? How can we be sure that this doesn't just mean that there is an aether but our tools were incapable of measuring it back then, instead of verifying Einstein's theories?

The Michelson Morely inteferometer was designed to keep the distance between the mirrors in its arms constant. The mirrors were not allowed to move relative to the rigid frame of the interferometer, but rigidly attached to the rigid frame. . The mirrors on the Ligo interferometer are not attached to the frame. They're attached to test masses, which are levitated suspended to support the mirrors against Earth's gravity, but are otherwise free to "slide around". One of the challenges of the design is to isolate the test masses so that other enviromental influences other than gravity waves cause as little motion as possible.

There are no test masses in the Michelson morely interferometer - the mirrors are attached to the frame of the interferometer directly.

[add]There are some details on the final stage of the suspension system for advanced ligo (aLigo) at https://www.advancedligo.mit.edu/sus.html. Basically, there is a multiple-pendulum system (three to four pendulums). There is some sort of possible active "sesmic isolation system" [SEI] in addition - the pendulums are hung from the sesmic isolation system. I haven't found any details on the SEI though..
 
Last edited:

Related to Gravitational Waves Vs. Aether Wind

1. What are gravitational waves?

Gravitational waves are ripples in the fabric of space-time caused by the acceleration of massive objects, such as when two black holes merge. They were predicted by Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity and were first observed in 2015.

2. What is the aether wind?

The aether wind, or luminiferous aether, was a theoretical concept proposed in the 19th century to explain the propagation of light. It was thought to be a medium that filled all of space and allowed light to travel through it. However, experiments in the early 20th century disproved the existence of the aether.

3. How are gravitational waves and the aether wind related?

In the past, scientists believed that the aether wind was responsible for the propagation of gravitational waves. However, this theory was disproven by the experiments of Michelson and Morley in 1887. It was later replaced by Einstein's theory of general relativity, which explains the propagation of gravitational waves without the need for the aether.

4. Can gravitational waves be affected by the aether wind?

No, gravitational waves are not affected by the aether wind because they do not require a medium to travel through. They are able to propagate through empty space, unlike light which was previously thought to need the aether. This is one of the major differences between the two concepts.

5. How do scientists detect gravitational waves?

Scientists use specialized instruments called interferometers to detect gravitational waves. These instruments measure tiny changes in the distance between two objects caused by passing gravitational waves. The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) is a prime example of such a detector, and it was used to make the first direct observation of gravitational waves in 2015.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
346
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
803
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
4
Replies
105
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
3K
Back
Top