Gravitational Waves: Verification Accuracy & Physicists' Opinions

In summary, there was a discussion about the LIGO experiments and the verification of gravitational waves on YouTube. It was pointed out that the polarized light scattered from dust could mask the effect of gravitational waves. However, the LIGO experiments have measured gravitational waves directly from black hole and neutron star mergers, which has been confirmed by multiple observatories. This is different from the BICEP experiment, which was later found to be due to polarization from dust. Most scientists now agree that the LIGO experiments have successfully demonstrated the existence of gravitational waves.
  • #1
arupel
45
2
From what I understand the LIGO experiments were the first in the road to demonstrating the existence of gravitational waves. There was a dicussion about this on Utube where someone pointed out that the polarized light scattered from dust, being much larger, could mask the the effect of gravitational waves.

Since the LIGO experiments are measurements of something almost impossibly small, what is the current opinion among physicists about the verification of gravitation waves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You're conflating two different observations. There was a report from an experiment called BICEP, which had claimed to see the indirect signal due to gravitational waves in the very early universe. It's now agreed by most scientists that these observations were more likely due to polarization due to dust in our galaxy, so people are still searching for these "B-mode" signals that would indicate the presence of gravitational waves in the early universe.

This is very different from the LIGO experiment, which measured the gravitational waves directly from black hole - black hole mergers, and more recently a neutron star - neutron star merger. I think, since these gravitational waves have been seen by both LIGO observatories in the US, and by the Virgo observatory in Europe, that most scientists would agree that we are really measuring gravitational waves.
 
  • Like
Likes Daverz, Orodruin and PeterDonis

Related to Gravitational Waves: Verification Accuracy & Physicists' Opinions

1. What are gravitational waves?

Gravitational waves are ripples in the fabric of spacetime that are caused by the acceleration of massive objects, such as black holes or neutron stars.

2. How are gravitational waves detected?

Gravitational waves are detected using extremely sensitive instruments called interferometers, which measure tiny changes in the distance between two points caused by the passing of a gravitational wave.

3. What is the accuracy of the verification process for gravitational waves?

The accuracy of the verification process for gravitational waves is incredibly high. The two detectors used in the first detection of gravitational waves, LIGO and Virgo, were able to confirm the signal with a 99.9999% accuracy.

4. Do all physicists agree on the existence of gravitational waves?

Yes, the existence of gravitational waves is widely accepted by the scientific community. Their existence was predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity and has been confirmed through multiple experiments and observations.

5. How do gravitational waves contribute to our understanding of the universe?

Gravitational waves provide a new tool for studying the universe and its most extreme phenomena, such as black holes and neutron stars. They also allow us to see the universe in a completely different way, providing a new perspective on the nature of gravity and spacetime.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
836
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
665
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top