Got asked, "Why does there 'need' to be a UFT"

  • Thread starter Cake
  • Start date
In summary, many physicists do not believe that a Theory of Everything is necessarily out there, but why wouldn't we try to come up with one? The fact that many of the relationships between everyday variables can be expressed in very simple linear terms seems to lead people to believe that there is no limit to this very simple modelling - i.e. we can use square laws, exponential laws, convolution, transforms and will eventually get complicated enough to describe 'everything'.
  • #36
matt621 said:
Generally the "need" comes from the desire to answer the question: Is the universe created or did it just happen.

What? Nothing to do with that (at least in my case and so many other scientist I work with).

If a UFT can be found, their is a reasonable next question: Why? Pretty much everyone wants to have a firm belief system. There are atheist that are sure of their position just like there are theists that are sure of their position. Then there is everyone else. They "need" to know if God exists or not.

What? What are you talking about?

What God do you mean?

We have created millions of totally different gods (and many other imaginary things) through the ages. Some of the concepts we create are useful, some others not that useful.

The creation of the concept of gods/deities by some humans may be an interesting thing (and some people like Ramachandran and others, try to explain it based on neuroscience knowledge), but as a useful concept to explain objective phenomena in a rational way...it has failed big time. Not useful at all.

Atheists are sure he/she/it does not exist, but their belief is not more assured than the theist that says he/she/it does exist. Everyone else just wants to know. I think that "need" comes from trying to answer the 2nd question, "Why?"

The problem is this: the universe seems to be ordered. That flys in the face of atheists.

What?

(Which many if not most scientists claim to be.) But can order really come out of chaos (or nothing) by it's own accord? Science does it's best to prove it can, but for ever "hit" there is a corresponding "miss." So the point is that it's an unanswerable question. I personally believe Pi is the answer.

My goodness, this is gold!

Pi cannot be solved. It's a never ending quest but it's ultimately unknowable.

We could even start a movie here...

For me, that proves God does exist because it proves the unknowable in an ordered universe. If the universe really created itself, then everything should be knowable. (Hence the "need" for a UFT.) The fact that there are unknowable elements in the universe seem to indicate that it's meant to be that way. It's a paradox by design.

Twice.

My goodness!

I don't know what to tell you man. I think it would help you a lot to study some things about Science and Philosophy, but I am not even sure about that anymore (many people I've met say they are better living without knowledge... :-) ).
 
<h2>1. Why is a Unified Field Theory (UFT) important in science?</h2><p>A UFT is important because it seeks to unify the fundamental forces of nature, namely gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. This would provide a more complete understanding of the universe and potentially lead to new discoveries and advancements in technology.</p><h2>2. What is the current progress on developing a UFT?</h2><p>There have been many attempts at developing a UFT, but so far, none have been widely accepted by the scientific community. Some theories, such as string theory and loop quantum gravity, show promise but have not yet been proven.</p><h2>3. How would a UFT impact our daily lives?</h2><p>A successful UFT could potentially lead to new technologies and applications, such as efficient energy production and transportation, improved medical treatments, and advancements in space exploration. However, the impact on our daily lives would depend on the specific theory and its practical applications.</p><h2>4. What are the challenges in developing a UFT?</h2><p>One of the main challenges in developing a UFT is the complexity of the fundamental forces and their interactions. Another challenge is the lack of experimental evidence to support different theories. Additionally, there is no guarantee that a UFT exists, as it may be beyond our current understanding of the universe.</p><h2>5. How does a UFT relate to the Theory of Everything?</h2><p>A UFT and the Theory of Everything are often used interchangeably, but they are not exactly the same. The Theory of Everything aims to explain all physical aspects of the universe, including the origin and nature of space and time, while a UFT focuses specifically on unifying the fundamental forces of nature. A successful UFT could potentially contribute to the development of a Theory of Everything.</p>

Related to Got asked, "Why does there 'need' to be a UFT"

1. Why is a Unified Field Theory (UFT) important in science?

A UFT is important because it seeks to unify the fundamental forces of nature, namely gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. This would provide a more complete understanding of the universe and potentially lead to new discoveries and advancements in technology.

2. What is the current progress on developing a UFT?

There have been many attempts at developing a UFT, but so far, none have been widely accepted by the scientific community. Some theories, such as string theory and loop quantum gravity, show promise but have not yet been proven.

3. How would a UFT impact our daily lives?

A successful UFT could potentially lead to new technologies and applications, such as efficient energy production and transportation, improved medical treatments, and advancements in space exploration. However, the impact on our daily lives would depend on the specific theory and its practical applications.

4. What are the challenges in developing a UFT?

One of the main challenges in developing a UFT is the complexity of the fundamental forces and their interactions. Another challenge is the lack of experimental evidence to support different theories. Additionally, there is no guarantee that a UFT exists, as it may be beyond our current understanding of the universe.

5. How does a UFT relate to the Theory of Everything?

A UFT and the Theory of Everything are often used interchangeably, but they are not exactly the same. The Theory of Everything aims to explain all physical aspects of the universe, including the origin and nature of space and time, while a UFT focuses specifically on unifying the fundamental forces of nature. A successful UFT could potentially contribute to the development of a Theory of Everything.

Similar threads

B Why are we trying to unify all the physical forces?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
8K
I The Simulation Theory and the dangers of pop-science
    • Other Physics Topics
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
I Why is the speed of light the same everywhere in the Universe?
    • Other Physics Topics
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
I What if unification does not work?
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
3K
B Why does the Sun need sunlight?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
2K
I How can concentration gradient field come into existence immediately?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
367
B Need help with understanding time travel
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
B Einstein's Unified Field Theory - Details
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
B Layman asks 2 basic questions regarding gravity & free will
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
2K
A Natural completion of theories
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top