Given the idea of a god, isn't it preposterous to claim there isn't one?

  • Thread starter dmatador
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Idea
In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between a god and humans, questioning the validity of atheism and the absurdity of believing in a god. The definition of atheism is also clarified, stating that it is the lack of belief in supernatural deities rather than a disbelief in them. The topic has been previously discussed and the suggestion is made to read old threads for further understanding.
  • #1
dmatador
120
1
I sometimes try to think about the relationship that exists in theory between a supposed god and us, the products of this god. The idea of a god implies that this is a being far beyond the scope of human intelligence and the laws of our physical world, so doesn't it seem a bit absurd to believe that humans can be atheistic, that is, claim that there is no god? I know that this question is based on perhaps some contrasting terms, for example, that an atheist believes that there is no god, so why should the relationship between this atheist and a theoretical god be considered? Nevertheless, I think it is a somewhat interesting question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your definition of atheist is incorrect. Atheists lack belief of supernatural deities, they don't even bother to disbelieve. Not to say their aren't anti-relgious sorts that for lack of a better name call themselves atheist.

We've had this exact discussion dozens of times already. i suggest you look up and read some of the old threads if you want to see discssuions on the subject.
 

1. Why do some scientists believe in a god while others do not?

There is no one definitive answer to this question as beliefs about the existence of a god are often shaped by personal experiences, cultural influences, and individual interpretations of scientific evidence. Some scientists may see evidence of a higher power in the complexity and order of the natural world, while others may view the same evidence through a purely scientific lens and see no need for a god to explain it.

2. Can science and religion coexist?

Yes, many scientists hold religious beliefs while still subscribing to the principles of the scientific method. Science and religion address different questions and can complement each other rather than conflict. However, conflicts can arise when religious beliefs are presented as scientific fact or when scientific discoveries challenge religious beliefs.

3. Isn't the concept of a god inherently untestable?

The existence of a god is a philosophical and theological question, not one that can be tested or proven through scientific methods. However, some scientists argue that certain claims made by religious texts can be tested and potentially disproven through scientific research.

4. How can a scientist justify belief in a god without empirical evidence?

For many scientists, belief in a god is not based solely on empirical evidence, but also on personal experiences, cultural traditions, and faith. Just as science cannot prove or disprove the existence of a god, personal beliefs cannot be proven or disproven by scientific methods.

5. Can the existence of a god be explained by science?

Science is a tool used to understand the natural world, and as such, it cannot definitively prove or disprove the existence of a god. However, some scientists have proposed theories and hypotheses to explain the origins of the universe and the development of life that could potentially be seen as compatible with certain religious beliefs.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
827
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
89
Views
14K
Replies
14
Views
925
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
668
  • General Discussion
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top