Give a set of inconsistent sentence with only one member?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of an inconsistent set of sentences and whether it is possible to have only one member in such a set. The issue is further complicated by the definitions of simple and complex sentences and the type of logic being used.
  • #1
Nusc
760
2
Is it possible to give a set of inconsistent sentences with only one member?

An inconsistent set of senteces requires that it is not possible for all members of that set to be true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
{ false }.
 
  • #3
In case that isn't clear enough, can the negation of a tautology ever be true? (Such a sentence is called a contradiction, if you want to look up a definition.)

There is at least one complcation, depending on (i) whether sentences (by your definition) can be simple or complex and (ii) what logic you're working in. In propositional logic, all simple, or atomic, sentences are contingent, i.e., non-tautologous and non-contradictory. This isn't so in, e.g., predicate logic, where you do have atomic tautologies.
 
Last edited:

Related to Give a set of inconsistent sentence with only one member?

1. What is an inconsistent sentence with only one member?

An inconsistent sentence with only one member is a statement that contradicts itself or does not make logical sense. For example, "I am both human and not human" is an inconsistent sentence.

2. Why would someone give a set of inconsistent sentences with only one member?

A set of inconsistent sentences with only one member may be given in order to demonstrate the concept of inconsistency and how it can lead to illogical or contradictory conclusions.

3. How can inconsistent sentences with only one member be identified?

Inconsistent sentences with only one member can be identified by looking for statements that contain contradictory or opposite ideas, or do not follow the rules of logic.

4. Can inconsistent sentences with only one member be true?

No, inconsistent sentences with only one member cannot be true because they contain contradictory or illogical statements.

5. What is the significance of studying inconsistent sentences with only one member in science?

In science, studying inconsistent sentences with only one member can help us understand the importance of logical reasoning and avoiding contradictions in our theories and conclusions. It also highlights the need for critical thinking and identifying errors in our reasoning.

Similar threads

I [(Linear) Temporal Logic] Are the given sentences consistent or not?
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
I Set Builder Roster methods
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Cardinality of Theorems vs True Sentences in a Theory
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
1K
MHB Understanding the Intersection of Inductive Sets & the Limits of λ Cardinality
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
765
MHB Gödel Number Usefulness to Determine an Infinite Set's Completeness
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Cardinality of a set of constant symbols (model theory)
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
MHB Give a set and a relation that satisfies the properties
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
10
Views
2K
I When does ## { n \choose k } ## represent set of lists?
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
20
Views
1K
A Maybe it is not necessary to define set membership?
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
13
Views
998
Contradiction: false or meaningless?
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top