Generators: Water instead of a coil?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of using water instead of a coil in generators, either through convection currents or water waves. However, it is determined that this idea is not feasible as water does not conduct electricity well and would not produce as much current as a coil. The use of liquid metals or hydrogen as conductors is also explored. Additionally, the conversation mentions the use of MHD technology for propulsion and power generation, but it is noted that the efficiency and practicality of these systems are still being researched.
  • #1
misogynisticfeminist
370
0
Yea, I just had a pretty weird idea, can we instead use water instead of a coil since water is a conductor as well (impure water that is.). Can we instead rely on convection currents or water waves to power this generator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I not sure I understand...are you saying we should use water with electrolytes instead of a coil of wire in the generators? How do you expect the water to help produce greater electricity if you can't even coil it. Having the coil move through the magnetic field can generate a lot more power than electrolites in water. Besides, copper for example is a lot more conductive than water with ions.
 
  • #3
Actually, I'm saying that the water acts as a coil in a conventional generator, and the movement of the water actually cuts the magnetic field which induces a current in the water. I'm not sure exactly how, and have no idea how a system using this thing I thought can be engineered yet, but is it theoretically sound?
 
  • #4
Perhaps a different use for hydroelectric dams? The motion of the water is supplied by the current?
 
  • #5
Where would you put the water?

And, how will you avoid water vaporization?.

I could help you more if you explicit it more geometrically (i.e water flowing).
 
  • #6
Using water in place of a coil is a terrible idea. Generators work by spinning a roter in the magnetic field of permanent magnets. The rotor has a coil of conductive wire, and as a conductor is moved through the magnetic field by spinning, it causes the flow of electrons in the conductor, which is a current. Using water to move through the magnetic field wouldn't give nearly the same amount of current, I am not even sure if ANY current would be produced. Although some current should be produced if the water has electrolytes in it, but once again I am not too sure.
 
  • #7
misogynisticfeminist said:
Yea, I just had a pretty weird idea, can we instead use water instead of a coil since water is a conductor as well (impure water that is.). Can we instead rely on convection currents or water waves to power this generator?

There's some research into magnetohydrodynamic propulsion for ships, using seawater. For instance

http://www.sanu.ac.yu/English/Shipbuilding/Tema4.htm

But I've never heard of any serious interest in MHD generators, at least for sewater. There's some interest in MHD generators using plasma as the conducting medium. Google finds for instance the explosive magnetohydrodynamic generator

http://www.stormingmedia.us/90/9059/A905953.html

The goal is apparently to provide a power supply for high power pulsed microwave devices, which could be used to burn out electronics
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
Well, while I agree that you can't really replace coils with water, liquids are used in sophisticated technology that requires really good conductivity. Liquid Hydrogen is used in MRI machines, as a way of conductivity. It's just that it would be more expensive, and probably more fragile, to use water as a conducter instead of a coil. I'm not sure, but I believe some metals have better conductivity, than water anyways.
 
  • #9
Zeteg said:
Well, while I agree that you can't really replace coils with water, liquids are used in sophisticated technology that requires really good conductivity. Liquid Hydrogen is used in MRI machines, as a way of conductivity. It's just that it would be more expensive, and probably more fragile, to use water as a conducter instead of a coil. I'm not sure, but I believe some metals have better conductivity, than water anyways.

That makes sense because liquid hydrogen is at almost obsolute zero, which means any current that goes through it will have very very little resistance, making it very conductive. Now that i think about it, it would be awsome to have a coil of wire in a generator which would be surrounded by a tube filled with liquid hydrogen/nitrogen/helium, using liquid nitrogen would be the least expensive. In fact I believe that people are planning to make the power lines that take electricity to homes have that kind of tube around it filled with some cold substance. If power lines are made that way, they would be able to power (im guessing) thousands more homes. Since I=V/R, at almost absolute zero R is very small, which gives a huge current. If absolute zero is ever achived in the wires, then the resistance would be 0, therefore I=V/0 = infinity, you would have infinite current.
 
  • #10
Zeteg said:
I'm not sure, but I believe some metals have better conductivity, than water anyways.

Water in its pure state doesn't conduct electricity at all. There has to be ions in the water to carry the current.
 
  • #11
GOD__AM said:
Water in its pure state doesn't conduct electricity at all. There has to be ions in the water to carry the current.

Like, for instance, sea water, which has salt.
 
  • #12
Yes, and with water you have many problems because there's only so much you can disolve in it in order for it to have ions. While with metals, you don't have the problem since its already conductive and plus is can be made superconductive if cooled.
 
  • #13
You can generate electricity using the difference in temperature at the surface of the sea and deep down.It has been tested near Hawaii somewhere.Don't ask me where.
 
  • #14
ArmoSkater87 said:
Yes, and with water you have many problems because there's only so much you can disolve in it in order for it to have ions. While with metals, you don't have the problem since its already conductive and plus is can be made superconductive if cooled.

The main attraction of MHD propulsion systems that attracts research interest is that they are potentially very quiet. See for instance "Red October". But they aren't the greatest as far as effeciency goes. Providing the intense magnetic field they need is a problem as well.
 

Related to Generators: Water instead of a coil?

1. How does a water generator work?

A water generator uses the force of moving water to turn a turbine, which then powers a generator to produce electricity. The generator converts the mechanical energy from the turbine into electrical energy, which can then be used to power various devices.

2. What are the advantages of using water instead of a coil in a generator?

The main advantage of using water instead of a coil in a generator is that it is a renewable energy source. Unlike fossil fuels, which are limited and contribute to pollution, water is an abundant and clean source of energy. Additionally, water generators do not emit any greenhouse gases and have a very low environmental impact.

3. Can water generators be used in all locations?

Water generators are best suited for locations with a consistent and strong flow of water, such as rivers, streams, and waterfalls. They can also be used in coastal areas where there are strong tidal currents. However, they may not be as effective in areas with low water flow or in locations with freezing temperatures.

4. How efficient are water generators compared to traditional generators?

The efficiency of a water generator depends on the design and location of the generator. In general, water generators are less efficient than traditional generators, which use coils and magnets. However, the renewable and sustainable nature of water generators makes them a more desirable option for many applications.

5. Are water generators expensive to build and maintain?

The cost of building and maintaining a water generator depends on various factors such as the size, location, and design of the generator. In general, water generators can be more expensive to build than traditional generators, but they have lower maintenance costs and do not require fuel. Over time, the cost savings from using a renewable energy source can offset the initial investment.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
960
Replies
13
Views
803
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Back
Top