General/special relativity-a measurement problem

In summary: This is because the other person's frame of reference is rotating faster than your own, and the ball appears to be moving away from them. This is called the "Coriolis effect".
  • #1
ofer
3
0
1. The problem statement: all variables and given/known

Describe a Non-Local Expirement that will lead to the conclusion that a body is in fact in a revolving system and not a system of constant acceleration. Non-Local meaning that the expirement uses 2 measurement instruments at 2 different points in space or 1 instrument with a segnificant size. describe what these instruments are and where they are placed.


2. this was given as a final part of a question involving describing the proper time of a body in a revolving system with SR due to gravitational potential. meaning not yet gotten to GR.




3. The Attempt at a Solution :
I tried to think of this something like the moon revolving around the earth, where the moon is the revolving system captured in the gravitational pull of the earth. somewhere 2 measurement instruments must be placed to variffy that the moon is revolving around the Earth and not being accelerated by some other constant force.
i'm really lost though on how to do this. i have a pretty good notion that an accelerometer should be used somewhere, or maybe clocks and something to do with proper time diffrences between the systems... really lost/

appriciate any kind o help.
thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
hmmm, so you meen a viewer outside of the rotating frame of reference would observe the coriolis effect.
thats true' although it feels kind of like cheating, because one could say that a viewer outside the system would actually see the object rotating..
how would he measure it though?
 
  • #4
It's NOT a matter of an "external observer". If you and another person are moving at a constant velocity, throwing a ball back and forth would be no different that if you we both stationary (relative to the "outside"). But if you are accelerating, because acceleration is NOT "relative" strange things may happen. In particular, if you and the other person are rotating around a point between you, throwing a ball toward the other person, you and the other person will see that ball curve away from the other person.
 
  • #5



I understand that the concept of relativity, both general and special, can be complex and may lead to measurement problems. In this specific case, the problem statement is to determine whether a body is in a revolving system or a system of constant acceleration. To address this, a non-local experiment is proposed, which involves using two measurement instruments at two different points in space or one instrument with a significant size. This experiment would help in verifying whether the body is in a revolving system or not.

To design such an experiment, we first need to understand the concept of proper time in special relativity. Proper time is the elapsed time measured by a clock that is at rest relative to the observed body. In a revolving system, the proper time would be affected by the gravitational potential, which is the potential energy per unit mass due to the gravitational field. This means that the proper time would be different at different points in space, depending on the gravitational potential.

To determine the proper time of a body in a revolving system, we can use two measurement instruments – a clock and an accelerometer. The clock would measure the elapsed time of the body, while the accelerometer would measure the acceleration of the body. These instruments should be placed at two different points in space, with a significant distance between them. This distance should be large enough to observe any differences in the proper time and acceleration measurements.

If the body is in a revolving system, the proper time measured by the clock at the two points in space would be different due to the different gravitational potentials. This would also affect the acceleration measurements by the accelerometer. However, if the body is in a system of constant acceleration, the proper time and acceleration measurements would be the same at both points in space.

By comparing the measurements from the two instruments, we can conclude whether the body is in a revolving system or a system of constant acceleration. This non-local experiment would provide evidence that the body is indeed in a revolving system, as the proper time and acceleration measurements would be different at the two points in space.

In conclusion, the concept of proper time in special relativity can be used to design a non-local experiment to determine whether a body is in a revolving system or a system of constant acceleration. This experiment would involve using a clock and an accelerometer at two different points in space, with significant distance between them. By comparing the measurements, we can conclude that the body is in a revolving system, providing a solution to the measurement problem.
 

Related to General/special relativity-a measurement problem

1. What is the theory of general relativity?

The theory of general relativity is a scientific theory proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915 to explain the force of gravity. It states that gravity is not a force between masses, but rather a curvature of space and time caused by the presence of mass and energy. This theory has been widely accepted and has been confirmed by various experiments and observations.

2. How is general relativity different from Newton's theory of gravity?

Newton's theory of gravity, also known as classical mechanics, describes gravity as a force between masses that decreases with distance. In contrast, general relativity describes gravity as a curvature of space and time caused by the presence of mass and energy. This means that the effects of gravity can be observed even when there is no physical contact between two objects, such as the orbit of planets around the sun.

3. What is the measurement problem in general relativity?

The measurement problem in general relativity arises from the fact that the theory predicts that the measurement of space and time intervals can vary depending on the observer's frame of reference. This is known as the relativity of simultaneity, where two events that appear simultaneous to one observer may not appear simultaneous to another observer in a different frame of reference. This can lead to discrepancies in measurements and can be challenging to reconcile in certain situations.

4. How is the measurement problem addressed in special relativity?

In special relativity, the measurement problem is addressed by the principle of relativity, which states that the laws of physics should be the same for all inertial observers. This means that all observers, regardless of their relative motion, should measure the same laws of physics. This allows for the consistent measurement of space and time intervals, as well as other physical quantities, between different observers.

5. How is the measurement problem being studied and addressed in current research?

Current research on the measurement problem in general relativity focuses on finding solutions that can reconcile discrepancies in measurements made by different observers. This includes developing new mathematical techniques and models to better understand the effects of relativity on measurements. Additionally, experiments are being conducted to test the predictions of general relativity and potentially find new ways to measure and observe the effects of gravity.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
733
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
144
Views
6K
Back
Top