Gauss' Law: Charge distribution on concentric spherical surfaces

In summary: The sphere has a total charge of 2Q.In summary, the electric field at every point inside the metal sphere is zero, but the electric field at every point outside the metal sphere is 3Qk/r^2.
  • #1
Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
2,168
193

Homework Statement



A metallic sphere of radius a is placed concentrically with a metallic spherical shell with inner radius b and outer radius c. The sphere has a total charge of 2Q and the shell has a total charge of 3Q.
(a) What is the charge distribution? Specifically, what is the charge density in the interior of the metals and at each surface (at r = a, b and c)?
(b) Use Gauss’ law to find the electric field at every point.
Adsız.png

Homework Equations


Gaussian Law

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]Part (a) The charge density of the interior of A is ##ρ=\frac {3(2Q)} {4πa^3}## and for other sphere
##ρ=\frac {3(3Q)} {4π(c^3-b^3}##
The surfaces charge density should be zero.I think like that cause.Electrons cannot pass air.
Electric field will be zero inside the small sphere ##(E=0 , r<a)## then its ##E=\frac {2Q} {4πr^2}## , ##a<r<b## then again zero inside the outer sphere ##(E=0, b<r<c)## then its ##E=\frac {5Q} {4πr^2}## , ##c<r##

Is this true ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nope. Charge in conductors is totally mobile. If the charge carries get a chance, they will sit as far away from each other as possible until they can't go any further. (Mathematically: ##\Delta V = 0## -- or rather ##\vec \nabla V = 0## -- in a conductor).

You only show answers, not your work; please show the steps and comment so we can find out whether
Arman777 said:
Is this true ?
holds ...
 
  • #3
If my answers are wrong my logic ahould be wrong too...The problem is Does the -2Q charge will cover the surface of inner sphere.I assumed no cause there no metal betweeen those two charges.But If they can still move then things will change for sure.
 
  • #4
-2Q is the amount of excess charge on the metal sphere, not two pieces of charge. Charge is not an object, it is attribute of objects. Just like an object have mass, it can have charge. If you charge a metal sphere for -2 C, it means lot and lot charge carriers, electrons. One electron has charge of -1.6˙ 10-19 C, so -2 C means 1.25˙10 19 electrons.˙
 
  • #5
ehild said:
-2Q is the amount of excess charge on the metal sphere, not two pieces of charge. Charge is not an object, it is attribute of objects. Just like an object have mass, it can have charge. If you charge a metal sphere for -2 C, it means lot and lot charge carriers, electrons. One electron has charge of -1.6 10-19 C, so -2 C means 1.25 10 19 electrons.
Sure but those -2Q charges will cover the surface ? I mean when I am trying to calculate the surface charge density I ll use that -2Q quantitiy
 
  • #6
Arman777 said:
Sure but those -2Q charges will cover the surface ? I mean when I am trying to calculate the surface charge density I ll use that -2Q quantitiy
Yes, they cover the surface. Electrons move free on the metal surfaces, so one electron can be anywhere there. You can calculate the surface charge density by dividing the charge with the surface area.
 
  • #7
"what is the charge density in the interior of the metals and at each surface " Then the charge density is 0. but surface charge density is ##E=\frac {-2Q} {4πr^2}## ?
 
  • #8
Yes. Don't use the symbol ##E## (it is generally used for the electric field strength; the symbol ##\sigma## is most often used for surface charge density.) And make a habit of mentioning the units too.
 
  • #9
Yeah my mistake sorry
 
  • #10
Note that there are three surfacess for which you are asked to give the charge density...
 
  • #11
So the outer shell inner surgace will be +2Q and outer surface +Q ?
 
  • #12
Spot on ! Bingo ! :kiss: However: that's the charges, not the charge densities but I suppose you understand what goes on.
 
  • Like
Likes Arman777
  • #13
I think I understand the idea...Electric field will be zero every point inside the outer shell till the outer surface then its 3Qk/r^2 ?
 
  • #14
Yeah I understand Just have to divide surface areas.And outher shell surface charge density will be 3Q/(Volume of outer shell)
 
  • #15
Oops, wrong dimension. You want something in C/m2 !
 
  • #16
There should be no surface...
 
  • #17
I ll write proparly..everything
 
  • #18
Lets call the spere inside A and outside sphere B.The charge density of A, ##ρ=0## (Total charge is zero)
Outer Surface charge density of A ##σ=\frac {-2Q} {4πa^2} \frac{C} {m^2}##
İnner surface charge density of B ##σ=\frac {2Q} {4πb^2} \frac{C} {m^2}##
Charge density of B ##ρ=\frac {3(3Q)} {4π(c^3-b^3)} \frac{C} {m^3}##
Outer surface charge density of B ##σ=\frac {Q} {4πc^2} \frac{C} {m^2}##

Electric Field will change like;
##E=0## till outer surface of B.(till r=c) then it will be ##E=\frac {3Q} {4πε_0r^2} \frac{N} {C}##

Electric field should be zero inside the shell B.
 
  • #19
Not good: check total charge on B
 
  • #21
Check again: integrate over the surfaces, integrate over the volume and add up: 6Q !
Gotta run now: concert.
 
  • #22
Theres total 5Q charge,how could it be 6Q ?
 
  • #23
BvU said:
Check again: integrate over the surfaces, integrate over the volume and add up: 6Q !
Gotta run now: concert.

Oh I understand it was +3Q -2Q passed other surface it become 5Q and one of them is in the outer I think its 5Q ?
 
  • #24
Clearly I didnt understand the total idea..I should look more
 
  • #25
Arman777 said:
Oh I understand it was +3Q -2Q passed other surface it become 5Q and one of them is in the outer I think its 5Q ?
You are right.
There was some confusion about the sign of charges. The problem text said that "The sphere has a total charge of 2Q and the shell has a total charge of 3Q."
The charge locates on the surfaces. So there is 2Q charge on the surface of the inner sphere of radius a. By induction, there is -2Q charge on the inner surface of the shell, a sphere of radius b, and to make the total charge of the shell 3Q, there must be 5Q charge on the outer surface of radius c.
 
  • #26
ehild said:
You are right.
There was some confusion about the sign of charges. The problem text said that "The sphere has a total charge of 2Q and the shell has a total charge of 3Q."
The charge locates on the surfaces. So there is 2Q charge on the surface of the inner sphere of radius a. By induction, there is -2Q charge on the inner surface of the shell, a sphere of radius b, and to make the total charge of the shell 3Q, there must be 5Q charge on the outer surface of radius c.

Makes sense
 
  • #27
Arman777 said:
Electrons cannot pass air.

This was true

I am confused after your posts.I asked my prof and the answer was like this,

İnide sphere there's 2Q
Outer speher inner surface -2Q
Outer sphere outhere surface 5Q
 
  • #28
Ys, we thought you had understood after post # 23, but apparently that was premature. Did prof make it clear to you or do we need to explain some more ?
 
  • #29
I understood thanks
BvU said:
Ys, we thought you had understood after post # 23, but apparently that was premature. Did prof make it clear to you or do we need to explain some more ?
 

Related to Gauss' Law: Charge distribution on concentric spherical surfaces

What is Gauss' Law and how does it relate to charge distribution on concentric spherical surfaces?

Gauss' Law is a fundamental law of electromagnetism that relates the electric flux through a closed surface to the charge enclosed by that surface. On a concentric spherical surface, Gauss' Law states that the electric flux through the surface is equal to the charge enclosed divided by the permittivity of free space.

What is the formula for Gauss' Law in terms of charge distribution on concentric spherical surfaces?

The formula for Gauss' Law for charge distribution on concentric spherical surfaces is given by ΦE = qenc / ε0, where ΦE is the electric flux through the surface, qenc is the charge enclosed by the surface, and ε0 is the permittivity of free space.

How can Gauss' Law be used to determine the electric field at a point outside of a charged spherical shell?

Gauss' Law can be used to determine the electric field at a point outside of a charged spherical shell by considering the charge enclosed by a concentric spherical surface centered at the point of interest. The electric field at the point is then equal to the electric flux through the surface divided by the surface area.

What is the significance of using concentric spherical surfaces in applying Gauss' Law?

Using concentric spherical surfaces in applying Gauss' Law allows for simplification of the calculations involved. Since the electric field is radial for a spherical charge distribution, the electric flux through a concentric spherical surface is constant, making it easier to determine the electric field at different points.

What are the limitations of Gauss' Law in determining the electric field for charge distributions on concentric spherical surfaces?

Gauss' Law is limited in its use for charge distributions on concentric spherical surfaces when there is non-spherical symmetry or when the charge distribution is not uniform. In these cases, other methods such as Coulomb's Law may need to be used to determine the electric field.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
525
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
630
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
86
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
781
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
460
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
696
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
453
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top