Frame of Reference- arrow traveling through a tube

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of an arrow traveling at a relativistic speed and whether there exists a frame of reference in which the arrow can be completely inside a tube with extra tube at its ends, or overhangs the tube from both sides. The answer is yes to both, and the justification can be done using mathematics, specifically the length contraction formula. The conversation also brings up the idea of the relativity of simultaneity. Furthermore, the conversation explores the concept of doors on both ends of the tube and how they affect the perception of the arrow's length in different frames of reference. The question of what happens if the doors are not reopened is left as food for thought.
  • #1
momentum2357
8
0
I was just wondering about the following problem. Suppose that you have an arrow placed in a tube. If the arrow travels at a relativistic speed, does there exist a frame of reference such that the arrow is completely in the tube with extra tube at its ends? Does there exist a frame of reference such that the arrow overhangs the tube from both sides, that is, both ends of the arrow are visible on both ends of the tube? Justify your answer uwing mathematics, if possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
momentum2357 said:
If the arrow travels at a relativistic speed, does there exist a frame of reference such that the arrow is completely in the tube with extra tube at its ends? Does there exist a frame of reference such that the arrow overhangs the tube from both sides, that is, both ends of the arrow are visible on both ends of the tube?
Yes to both.
Justify your answer uwing mathematics, if possible.
Do it yourself. Hint: Don't forget the relativity of simultaneity.
 
  • #3
What I have is that the frames of reference are the tube and arrow, respectively. I concluded this using the simple length contraction formula L=L_0\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}}<L (how can I use LaTeX on these forums?). Correct?
 
  • #4
Yes. If the proper lengths of tube and arrow equal [itex]L_0[/itex], then the length of one as measured in the frame of the other will be Lorentz contracted per that formula. (To use Latex, read https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997" or click on the [itex]\Sigma[/itex] format command.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Suppose the tube has doors on both ends that can be closed and opened. When the arrow is at rest in the frame of the tube it is longer than the tube, and when it is in motion it is shorter than the tube. The operator who is stationary with the tube quickly and simultaneously closes and reopens the doors when the arrow is completely inside the tube. However, the observer moving with the arrow sees the tip of the arrow enter the tube and before the tip reaches the far end of the tube, the door on that end closes. The door then immediately reopens to allow the tip to continue on its way. Subsequently, when the trailing end of the arrow enters the tube, the door on that end closes behind it (and then reopens). In the frame of the arrow the doors do not close simultaneously, and that allows the arrow to extend beyond the tube.

Food for thought: What happens if the doors are not reopened?
 

Related to Frame of Reference- arrow traveling through a tube

1. What is a frame of reference?

A frame of reference is an established set of axes or coordinates used to describe the position, velocity, and acceleration of an object in motion. It is used to measure and compare the motion of an object from a specific point of view.

2. How does a frame of reference affect the measurement of an arrow traveling through a tube?

A frame of reference can affect the measurement of an arrow traveling through a tube by providing a perspective on the motion of the arrow. It allows us to measure the displacement, velocity, and acceleration of the arrow relative to a fixed point of reference, such as the tube itself or the observer's position.

3. What is the importance of choosing an appropriate frame of reference for studying the motion of an arrow through a tube?

Choosing an appropriate frame of reference is crucial for accurately understanding and analyzing the motion of an arrow through a tube. It helps to eliminate any external factors that may influence the motion of the arrow and allows us to focus solely on the motion of the arrow itself.

4. Can the frame of reference affect the perceived direction of the arrow's motion through the tube?

Yes, the frame of reference can affect the perceived direction of the arrow's motion through the tube. Depending on the chosen frame of reference, the arrow's motion may appear to be moving in a different direction. For example, if the frame of reference is moving with the arrow, the motion may appear to be stationary, while if the frame of reference is stationary, the motion may appear to be in the opposite direction of the arrow.

5. How does the frame of reference impact the calculation of the arrow's speed and acceleration through the tube?

The frame of reference plays a crucial role in calculating the arrow's speed and acceleration through the tube. By choosing an appropriate frame of reference, we can accurately measure the displacement, velocity, and acceleration of the arrow. However, if the frame of reference is not chosen carefully, it may result in inaccurate calculations and interpretations of the arrow's motion.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
764
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
939
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top