Will agnostic wars replace religious wars in the future?

  • News
  • Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date
In summary: I thought it was interesting), but that was about it. Now, if the religious wrong decides that they want to go the way of George Bush, Sr. and take away the citizenship of atheists, then you'd better be sure there will be an uprising of sorts... or at very least a mass exodus of a good deal of the US's scientists who just lost their security clearances.[/rant]In summary, atheists will not unite to fight against theists. Instead, there will be "agnostic" wars. Personally, I will side with peace.
  • #1
Loren Booda
3,125
4
I predict future conflicts involving atheists against theists. Instead of religious wars, there would be "agnostic" wars. Personally, I will side with peace.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I disagree.

The one thing about atheists as a group is that they are not a group. There is never any single cause to united them. There is never anything in particular to fight for. While a theist can always invoke the will of God to band together for a common cause, Atheists cannot band together to declare a lack of God. Most also are opposed to forcing people's opinion, and simply lack the same sense of self-righteous fervour to really last such a conflict.

Theists meanwhile are simply too fragmented to declare such a war. And there is not really much point in declaring war on atheists, since they will just pretend to worship anyway. How can you really tell if they are a real theist?
 
  • #3
I am like all other atheists only in that I do not believe there are any gods. Beyond that, I may differ dramatically in my values and beliefs from any other atheist. On both sides of the political spectrum, one can find the neo-conservative Objectivists and the ultra-liberal Communists, both of whom hate each other. These two factions take up nearly opposite sets of values, yet both are comprised of unabashed atheists. I agree with neither. Similar diversity can be found in any other group -- agnostics include devout Christians, freethinkers include New Agers, and the nonreligious include among their ranks everything from nihilists to flakes.
-- Richard C. Carrier
 
  • #4
Well-considered rebuttal. Thanks, gents.
 
  • #5
Originally posted by FZ+
I disagree.

The one thing about atheists as a group is that they are not a group. There is never any single cause to united them. There is never anything in particular to fight for.
Yep. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. Athiests don't believe in anything so they have nothing to squeak about.

Of course religious people could always start the wars, but I doubt it. Religious people fight people of other religions, not people of no religion.
 
  • #6
Originally posted by russ_watters
Religious people fight people of other religions, not people of no religion.

Unless of course you are a high school student (or younger) who let's it slip that you doubt the existence of their god.

Beatings-a-plenty from the bullies, and depending on location, varying degrees of condescension and punishment from the administrators.

Good old fashioned Christian love for you.

Of course, that isn't a war... just oppression.

Now, if the religious wrong decides that they want to go the way of George Bush, Sr. and take away the citizenship of atheists, then you'd better be sure there will be an uprising of sorts... or at very least a mass exodus of a good deal of the US's scientists who just lost their security clearances.

[/ramble]
[/rant]
 
  • #7
Originally posted by enigma
Unless of course you are a high school student (or younger) who let's it slip that you doubt the existence of their god.

Beatings-a-plenty from the bullies, and depending on location, varying degrees of condescension and punishment from the administrators.

Good old fashioned Christian love for you.

Of course, that isn't a war... just oppression.

Now, if the religious wrong decides that they want to go the way of George Bush, Sr. and take away the citizenship of atheists, then you'd better be sure there will be an uprising of sorts... or at very least a mass exodus of a good deal of the US's scientists who just lost their security clearances.

[/ramble]
[/rant]


Taking away any large group of society will harm it.
 
  • #8
Really, enigma? Where exactly did you grow up (if I may ask - I live outside of Philadelphia)? My school was fairly diverse (compared with other suburban white-bread schools) and we never had any problems like that.
 
  • #9
I grew up outside of Washington DC.

Luckily, I missed out on physical violence, though I have spoken with several people who weren't so lucky.

I wasn't as vocal then as I am now, so that may have something to do with it.

I did experience a good deal of prosthelising (sp?) and condescension though, some of it continuing up through college.

Atheists in the bible belt are worse than second class citizens to the general population.

I apologize for ranting like this. I just get riled up about religious descrimination and false persecution complexes of the religious right more and more as the years go on.

EDIT This is why I stay the heck out of the Religion forum. I just end up getting angry.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Wow, enigma, beatings for being an atheist in high school, never heard of that (how godly). I went to high school in a rather conservative area in Florida, and a some people gave me a good amount of condescension when finding out my views (I wasn't afraid to admit it, but I didn't go out proclaiming it and ringing a bell, either).

I don't know how the crap you can get punishment from the administration...sounds like a 1st amendment case to me...Although my high school did have a policy against wearing satanic stuff..which i find to be complete bullcrap.
 
  • #11
The persecution complex of America Christians may eventually lead to violence...false victimization claims tend to galvanize that community.
 
  • #12
Originally posted by FZ+
I disagree.

The one thing about atheists as a group is that they are not a group. There is never any single cause to united them. There is never anything in particular to fight for. While a theist can always invoke the will of God to band together for a common cause, Atheists cannot band together to declare a lack of God. Most also are opposed to forcing people's opinion, and simply lack the same sense of self-righteous fervour to really last such a conflict.

Theists meanwhile are simply too fragmented to declare such a war. And there is not really much point in declaring war on atheists, since they will just pretend to worship anyway. How can you really tell if they are a real theist?
I agree with FZ+.
 

1. Will agnostic wars completely replace religious wars in the future?

It is difficult to predict the future with certainty, but it is possible that agnostic wars may become more prevalent. As society becomes more secular and individuals question the role of religion in conflicts, the likelihood of purely agnostic wars may increase.

2. What is the difference between agnostic wars and religious wars?

Agnostic wars are conflicts that are not motivated by religious beliefs or ideologies. They may be driven by political or economic factors, or even personal grievances. Religious wars, on the other hand, have a clear religious motivation and often involve a clash of beliefs or ideologies.

3. Are there any examples of agnostic wars in history?

Yes, there have been many examples of agnostic wars throughout history. Some notable examples include the American Civil War, World War I, and the Cold War. These conflicts were not primarily motivated by religion, but rather by political, economic, or ideological differences.

4. Could agnostic wars potentially be more dangerous than religious wars?

It is difficult to say definitively which type of war is more dangerous. Both agnostic and religious wars have the potential to result in significant loss of life and destruction. However, religious wars can be particularly volatile due to the fervent beliefs and strong emotions involved.

5. How can we prevent agnostic wars from escalating into religious wars?

One way to prevent agnostic wars from turning into religious wars is through open communication and understanding. By promoting empathy and tolerance, we can bridge the divide between different beliefs and ideologies. Additionally, addressing underlying political and economic issues can help prevent conflicts from turning into religious wars.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
5
Replies
142
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
20
Views
11K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
759
  • General Discussion
4
Replies
105
Views
17K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
89
Views
12K
Back
Top