Finding ##\partial^\mu\phi## for a squeezed state in QFT

In summary, the speaker is seeking help with calculating ##\partial^\mu\phi## for a massless and minimally coupled squeezed state. They have defined their state using ladder operators and mode functions, and are having trouble due to the sum over k and the ladder operators. Another person suggests applying the linear operator term by term and using a different summation index in the exponent. They also note that this describes a field operator, not a state.
  • #1
Sciencemaster
98
15
TL;DR Summary
I'm trying to apply an operator to a massless and minimally coupled squeezed state, I'm having trouble calculating ##\partial^\mu\phi## but due to a sum over k and the ladder operators.
I'm trying to apply an operator to a massless and minimally coupled squeezed state. I have defined my state as $$\phi=\sum_k\left(a_kf_k+a^\dagger_kf^*_k\right)$$, where the ak operators are ladder operators and fk is the mode function $$f_k=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2L^3\omega}}e^{ik_\mu x^\mu}$$ (assuming periodic boundary condition in a three-dimensional box of side L where k is the wave number).
However, I'm having trouble calculating ##\partial^\mu\phi## due to the sum over k and the ladder operators. I would very much appreciate it if someone could help me through the math of this step!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, ##\partial_\mu## is a linear operator, so you can apply it term by term in the sum. As for the ladder operators, if they're independent of ##x## you can just treat them like constants during the partial differentiation.

Btw, you'll need to use a different dummy summation index in the exponent so as not to conflict with the free index ##\mu## on ##\partial_\mu##. E.g., change ##k_\mu x^\mu## to ##k_\alpha x^\alpha##.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and vanhees71
  • #3
One should also note that this doesn't describe a state but a field operator in terms of free-field energy eigenmodes or a neutral scalar field. The ##\hat{a}_k## are annihilation and ##\hat{a}_k^{\dagger}## in Fock space.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
113
Views
10K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
908
Back
Top