Find Transcendental Equation for Triple Delta Potential Energy

[mtjs]

Homework Statement

I'm looking for the bound energy of a triple delta potential:

[tex]V(x) = -w \left [ \delta(x-a) + \delta(x) + \delta(x+a) \right ][/tex]

What is the correct transcendental equation for kappa?

Homework Equations

My wave function is [tex]\psi_1(x) = A e^{\kappa x}[/tex] for x < -a, [tex]\psi_2(x) = B \cosh(\kappa(x+a/2)[/tex] for -a < x < 0, [tex]\psi_3(x) = C \cosh(\kappa(x-a/2))[/tex] for 0< x < a, [tex]\psi_4(x) = D e^{-\kappa x}[/tex] forx > a.

We use this continuity formula [tex]\psi'( z+\epsilon) - \psi'(z-\epsilon) = -\frac{2mw}{\hbar^2} \psi(z)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution

Calculating the continuity formula at x = 0 gives [tex]\kappa \tanh(\frac{\kappa a}{2}) = \frac{m w}{\hbar^2}[/tex]

This means, you get the same bound energy as for one delta potential if a is very large, and something weird for small a?

 

[mfb]

Very large a just mean your particle is in the middle and the other parts are not important.

Shouldn't there be a second equation from the second potential? And I think your approach for the inner wavefunctions is not general enough to find all solutions.

 

[mtjs]

Is my equation for x = 0 correct? For x = a or x = -a, you get the same transcendental equation as for the double-delta potential?

[tex]1 + \tanh(\frac{\kappa a}{2}) =\frac{2 m w}{\hbar^2 \kappa}[/tex]

 

[mfb]

Is my equation for x = 0 correct?

For your chosen wavefunctions, it looks fine.

For x = a or x = -a, you get the same transcendental equation as for the double-delta potential?

[tex]1 + \tanh(\frac{\kappa a}{2}) =\frac{2 m w}{\hbar^2 kappa}[/tex]

Up to factors of two maybe, but you have to check your ansatz for the wavefunctions.

 

[mtjs]

So after all, you get two different bound energy values. One for the delta at x = 0 and one for two deltas at x = -a and x = a.

 

[mfb]

That just shows your wavefunction is not general enough. The bound energy states have to satisfy both equations at the same time.

 

[mtjs]

Now I see where I did wrong.

The correct wave function is:
[tex]\psi_1(x) = A e^{\kappa x}[/tex]
for x < -a,

[tex]\psi_2(x) = B e^{\kappa x} + C e^{-\kappa x}[/tex]
for -a < x < 0,

[tex]\psi_3(x) = D e^{\kappa x} + E e^{-\kappa x}[/tex]

for 0< x < a,

[tex]\psi_4(x) = F e^{-\kappa x}[/tex]
for x > a.

 

[mfb]

That is better, right.

I would use ##\psi_1(x) = A e^{\kappa (x+a)}## and similar expressions to make the coefficients easier to evaluate, but that is a detail.