What happens when you turn on the light in a simple thought experiment?

In summary, the conversation revolves around a thought experiment regarding the creation of a cosmos and the existence of a fifth force. The experiment involves starting with a solar mass and the process of energy propagation. There is also discussion about the possibility of astral projection and the potential for the theory of a fifth force to win a Nobel Prize in the future.
  • #1
force5
146
0
This is a thought experiment that I've done many times over the years.
I like to create a nice and simple cosmos that allows me to select the variables I choose to particapate in my experiment. I always start out with a solar mass of some size. The first time I did this experiment, I just imagined a system of about 10 solar masses. I didn't include anything else at the start.

step 1 - Turn on the light?

At first I wasn't sure if I wanted a star or just a ball of hydrogen gas. I decided a ball of hydrogen gas would force me to address the issue of starting a fire, keeping in mine that at least in my model, the cosmos and the universe are one and the same before I light the fire.

step 2 - Energy Propagation - push or pull?

I decided my cosmos would not be a perpetual motion machine. So I choose to "pull" on the system to start the process of producing the radiating energy. The external pull would separate the force from the system. Due to the fundamental forces in nature, this external force would not be able to pull the system apart, but extract some of the energy contained in the hydrogen gas and convert it to a radiating light. The radiation increased the volume of the cosmos, at least in my system. If we relate this thought experiment to our own solar system and our solar system is five(5) billion years old, then this cosmos would have a diameter of about 10 billion light years.

I would like to know if any of you like doing thought experiments of this type? I think as long as these types of experiments are done using sound physics guidelines and paramenters, much insight can be gained in relating to many complex configurations. I realize this example is an over simplication, but you got to start somewhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
force5,

Before responding to your thought experiment, allow me to ask you a question. Are you a forerunner of the existence of a fifth force?

I know there are four fundamental forces in nature. These are the gravity force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force and the strong nulcear force. The effective range of the 1st two forces are infinite while the effective range of the last two forces are only within the the nuclear domain.

I am doing research in looking for a fifth force which, ironically, I dubbed as the force of antigravity. In inflationary cosmology, this force is akin to the existence of negative pressure in the inflaton field.

Now, back to your thought experiment, I do have the following comments. There are many unknowns (missing parameters) in this experiment. There is no mention of temperature, density, pressure, or the dynamics responsible for energy production.

The only givens are the 10 solar masses and the hydrogen gas. But still the mechanism of starting the fire must be mentioned otherwise you can always say that it is started by magic.

The information for the formation and birth of a star can be found in the book by Sir Arthur S. Eddington entitled: The Internal Constitution of the Stars, 1926, Cambridge Science Classics.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Just food for thought

Antonio,

in answer to your first question, yes, I have determined there is a fifth force and this force is responsible for "cosmos" expansion. I concluded that the dark energy plays a major roll in this process.

Now, the simple thought experiment was not intended to be a complete description of the total process since the variables could be almost endless. By me stating that "my" cosmos with one star of about 10 solar masses, is "not" a perpetual motion machine, implies that it is a closed system and the fundamental force(s) are external to the processes occurring within the system. This is the necessary cause and effect responsible for the "pull" force producing propagation.

Thanks for your comments.
 
  • #4
Thanks for the quick response. But I still not very clear how the 5th force was incorporated into your thought experiment. Or are you going to show us how maybe later?
 
  • #5
Energy extraction via fifth force

Antonio,

I've been developing my theories for over twenty years and can't go into a lot of detail here and now. But I will say that when I refer to the "pull" force against the system, I'm impling that the fifth force is responsible for extracting energy from the system. This extraction is what we experience as all forms of radiation.
 
  • #6
force, is this an attempt for a certain kind of astral projection? if it is, it is well done by what i can see, but i have never astral projected, come very very close though, but never actually succeeded. keep up the great work my friend.
 
  • #7
force5,

The 5th force I'm working on can be given by its proportionality to the difference between the electric force and magnetic force.

[tex] F_5 = k_5 (F_E - F_B) [/tex]

where [itex]k_5[/itex] is the constant of proportionality. [itex] F_E = qE [/itex] is the electric force, [itex] F_B = qv \times B [/itex] is the magnetic force. q is the electric charge, E is the electric field, B is the magnetic field.
 
  • #8
right on track

Antonio,

When I started this thread I really didn't intend to discuss my theories. But, only get some idea about how interested other people are in doing thought experiments.

But I will say, according to my work, you are right on track. When I first thought about a fifth force, it was only because of the neccessity to satisfy my theoritical model. Of course I was very happy when I learned about dark energy and dark matter. These findings were what I needed to get some assurance that my work could have an impact on future events.
 
  • #9
force5,

Don't you feel the urge to publish your ideas of the 5th force? If your theory has bearing within physics, you might just win the Nobel Prize for giving a successful suggested experimental verification.

Looking far ahead into the future, your 5th force might be just the mean for interplanetary travel or interstellar travel or intergalactic travel?
 
  • #10
maybe some day

Antonio,

When I set out on this course many years ago, the last thing on my mind was achiving the level of comprehension that I have so far. Seeking fame or fortune has never been my objective. Knowing the truth is the greastest reward I could possibly have. naturally, one would wish to share any information that could add to our overall understanding of things.

I've spent the last four or five years visiting hundreds of web sites in hopes of finding someone that has developed simular concepts and theories so that I could possibly contribute to their efforts. Although I have this passion for seeking the truth, I have absolutly no desire to spend what time I have left trying to convince anyone of anything.

I think you would agree that most professionals in the field of science
seek the truth just as we do, but, if the truth led to major changes in research funding, the establishment would not except new ideas with open arms.

Although I have become my own worst critic, I have not yet ruled out the possibility that I could be a first class crackpot.

Thanks for your comments.
 
  • #11
It's comforting to know that I'm not the only one seeking the reality of the fifth essence. Thanks for giving me this awareness.
 

What is a simple thought experiment?

A simple thought experiment is a mental exercise that explores a particular concept or hypothesis. It involves using your imagination to consider different scenarios and their outcomes, without the need for physical experimentation.

Why are simple thought experiments useful for scientists?

Simple thought experiments allow scientists to test and evaluate ideas in a quick and cost-effective way. They also help to identify potential flaws in a hypothesis or theory, and can lead to further research and development.

How are simple thought experiments different from traditional experiments?

Simple thought experiments do not require any physical materials or equipment, and are conducted solely in the mind. Traditional experiments, on the other hand, involve real-world observations and measurements.

Can simple thought experiments be used to prove or disprove a theory?

No, simple thought experiments cannot prove or disprove a theory on their own. They are simply a tool for exploring ideas and generating hypotheses. Further experimentation and evidence are needed to support or refute a theory.

Are there any limitations to using simple thought experiments in scientific research?

Yes, there are limitations to using simple thought experiments. They cannot account for all variables and factors that may affect a real-world situation, and may oversimplify complex concepts. They also rely heavily on the individual's imagination and may be subject to bias.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
516
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
865
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top