Faster Than Light Travel: Exploring Kinetic Energy

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of faster than light travel and how it is considered impossible. However, it is argued that if a rod is 1 light year long and someone is standing at the other end, they would feel a poke immediately due to the kinetic energy generated. This suggests that the rod is traveling faster than light, but in reality, the speed of sound in the rod is responsible for the immediate sensation. The conversation also mentions the impossibility of violating special relativity and encourages further discussion on the topic.
  • #1
ddarlage
1
0
They say that faster than light travel is impossible. However, if you made a rod 1 light year long and someone was standing at the other end when you bumped it. They would feel it immediately. The kinetic energy generated by the poke reaches the person before the light. Kinetic energy is an attribute of an object in motion. Therefore the stick is traveling faster than light.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ddarlage said:
They say that faster than light travel is impossible. However, if you made a rod 1 light year long and someone was standing at the other end when you bumped it. They would feel it immediately. The kinetic energy generated by the poke reaches the person before the light. Kinetic energy is an attribute of an object in motion. Therefore the stick is traveling faster than light.

Why would they feel it immediately? What is the speed of sound in a rod? If you smack one end of a rod with a hammer, the sound and movement) of the smack propagates at the speed of sound in the rod...
 
  • #4
Information, matter, and energy cannot travel faster than light. Rather than ask if you have proven special relativity wrong, you should ask what is wrong with your reasoning such that it appears you can violate special relativity. I promise you, it will not be violated in your example.
 
  • #5


While it may seem like the person at the other end of the 1 light year long rod is feeling the poke faster than the speed of light, this is not actually the case. The speed of light is a fundamental constant in the universe and nothing can travel faster than it. The sensation of feeling the poke at the other end of the rod is due to the transfer of kinetic energy through the rod, not the actual physical movement of the rod itself.

In fact, even if we were to create a hypothetical scenario where the rod was able to physically move faster than the speed of light, it would violate the laws of physics as we know them. The concept of faster than light travel is currently not possible according to our current understanding of the universe.

Furthermore, the concept of kinetic energy is based on the object's mass and velocity, not its speed relative to the speed of light. So, while the kinetic energy may be transferred at a fast rate through the rod, it does not mean that the rod itself is traveling faster than light.

In conclusion, the idea of faster than light travel is still a topic of scientific research and exploration, but it is currently not possible according to our current understanding of physics. The scenario described in the content is not a valid example of faster than light travel and does not change the fundamental laws of the universe.
 

Related to Faster Than Light Travel: Exploring Kinetic Energy

1. How is faster than light travel possible?

Faster than light travel is currently only a concept and has not been proven to be possible. However, some theories suggest that it could be achieved through the manipulation of space-time or by using wormholes.

2. What is the role of kinetic energy in faster than light travel?

Kinetic energy is the energy an object possesses due to its motion. In the concept of faster than light travel, it is believed that an object would need to have a tremendous amount of kinetic energy in order to surpass the speed of light.

3. Can an object with mass travel faster than the speed of light?

As of now, it is believed that an object with mass cannot travel faster than the speed of light. This is due to the theory of relativity, which states that as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases infinitely, making it impossible to reach or surpass the speed of light.

4. Is there any evidence of faster than light travel?

There is currently no evidence to support the possibility of faster than light travel. While some theories and experiments have been proposed, they have not been proven to be feasible or successful.

5. What are the potential risks of faster than light travel?

One potential risk of faster than light travel is the potential for time dilation. This means that as an object travels closer to the speed of light, time will pass slower for the object. This could lead to complications with aging and potential issues with returning to the original point in time.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
102
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
945
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
2K
Back
Top