Descartz2000 said:Refuting the existence of free choice experiments is a way to explain the results without turning to FTL.
That's probably true. Still, one can use logic (rather than an experiment) to show that "free choice" is not compatible with some theories. For example, both classical and quantum mechanics interpreted as UNIVERSAL theories (by an "universal" theory I mean a theory for which one assumes that EVERYTHING, including the human mind, is completely described by that theory) are not compatible with "free choice".DrChinese said:I don't consider the hypothesis of "no free choice" to be science (any more than the hypothesis of God is science). And I don't think it is possible to refute free choice by any experiment (just as it is not possible to refute the existence of God).