Expressing with "product" notation

In summary, \prod_{k=1}^j\left[k\right]=j! is the relationship between j! and \prod notation where f(k) = k and the limits are k = 1 to j.
  • #1
shamieh
539
0
1]express j! in ∏ notation

Are they just wanting something like \(\displaystyle j! + (j-1)! + (j-2)! +(j-3)!\)...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, they want you to take:

\(\displaystyle j!=1\cdot2\cdot3\cdots(j-2)(j-1)j\)

And rewrite the right side using \(\displaystyle \prod\) notation. Are you familiar with how to use this notation?
 
  • #3
No I'm not familiar.

- - - Updated - - -

\(\displaystyle \prod^n_{i=1} j!\) something like this?
 
  • #4
It works like this:

\(\displaystyle \prod_{k=1}^n\left[f(k)\right]\equiv f(1)\cdot f(2)\cdot f(3)\cdots f(n-2)\cdot f(n-1)\cdot f(n)\)

So, what do you suppose the relationship between $f$ and the index $k$ would be? What do you suppose should be the lower and upper limit for the index $k$?
 
  • #5
f is always multiplied by k.

\(\displaystyle \prod^j_{k=1} n!\)
 
  • #6
shamieh said:
f is always multiplied by k.

\(\displaystyle \prod^j_{k=1} n!\)

You have the limits correct, but what you have written is:

\(\displaystyle \prod^j_{k=1} n!=(n!)^j\)

Compare the two expressions I gave:

\(\displaystyle j!=1\cdot2\cdot3\cdots(j-2)(j-1)j\)

\(\displaystyle \prod_{k=1}^n\left[f(k)\right]\equiv f(1)\cdot f(2)\cdot f(3)\cdots f(n-2)\cdot f(n-1)\cdot f(n)\)

Do you see that in this case we want:

\(\displaystyle f(k)=k\)

Hence:

\(\displaystyle \prod_{k=1}^j\left[k\right]=j!\)
 
  • #7
OH I see what you're saying..
 
  • #8
Because of the commutativity of multiplication, you could also write:

\(\displaystyle j!=\prod_{k=0}^{j-1}\left[j-k\right]\)
 

Related to Expressing with "product" notation

1. What is "product" notation?

"Product" notation is a mathematical shorthand used to express the multiplication of multiple terms. It involves using the symbol "x" to represent multiplication and listing all the terms to be multiplied together. For example, 2x3x4 would be written as "product notation" 2, 3, 4.

2. How is "product" notation different from traditional multiplication?

"Product" notation differs from traditional multiplication in that it is a more concise and organized way of representing multiplication. Instead of writing out all the terms and symbols, "product" notation allows for multiple terms to be written using just one symbol, making it easier to perform calculations and understand complex equations.

3. When would you use "product" notation?

"Product" notation is commonly used in algebra and other areas of mathematics where expressions and equations involve multiple terms being multiplied together. It is also frequently used in statistical analysis and in the study of functions and their graphs.

4. What are the advantages of using "product" notation?

There are several advantages to using "product" notation. It allows for more efficient and organized representation of multiplication, making it easier to understand and perform calculations. It also helps to reduce errors and confusion, especially when dealing with complex equations.

5. Are there any rules or conventions for using "product" notation?

Yes, there are a few rules and conventions to follow when using "product" notation. The terms to be multiplied should be listed in order from left to right, and the use of parentheses can be used to specify the order of operations. Additionally, the symbol "x" should only be used for multiplication and not for variables or unknowns.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
840
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
984
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
658
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
771
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
26
Views
2K
Back
Top