Exploring the Big Bang: Unveiling the Unknowns

In summary, in the first moments after the Big Bang, a superforce combined the four fundamental forces into one, and the laws of physics were not fully understood. The Planck time, during which both quantum theory and general relativity were relevant, lasted for only a fraction of a yoctosecond. However, after this time, the universe began to expand and particles could potentially move faster than the speed of light due to the expansion of space itself. There is still uncertainty about the exact laws of physics during this time, and the possibility of gravity joining the other forces in the unified superforce is still unknown.
  • #1
HarryDaniels
43
0
In the most recent theory I have heard, just in the first moments after the Big Bang strange things happened. I heard that there was not four fundamental forces, just one, or superforce. I also heard that the laws of physics did not apply.

How long was this time. As from research I have seen that the particles reached a lightyear in a second. According to Einstein, nothing can travel faster than light, so that law of physics did not apply at this point. But from other reading I have read that this "Planck time" only existed for perhaps a millionth of a yontosecond.

Can someone clear out the cobwebs for me.
Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Correct, the forces of the universe were combined at the instant of the BB. Gravity is believed the first to separate. It is unclear when this happened. Apparently a fair amount of inflation occurred before gravity jumped in.
 
  • #3
Thanks for your question Harry, I think I can answer it.

First off, the Planck time (around 10-44 sec) is the moment at which a particle's Compton wavelength (the scale at which quantum effects become important) becomes equivalent to the particle's Schwarzschild radius (the scale at which gravity becomes important). Therefore, it defines this moment when two important kinds of physics are both relevant, namely, quantum theory and general relativity. There is currently no known theory that successfully incorporates both quantum theory and general relativity, and so that's why you might hear people say that the "laws of physics do not apply here." However, it is widely believed that some theory applies here, it has just yet to be found.

However, current physical theories are capable of describing the universe after the Planck time. These theories are consistent with a universe in which 3 of the fundamental forces (electromagnetic, strong & weak nuclear) were unified into a single "superforce". It is conjectured that if we were to rewind the tape all the way back to the Planck time, gravity would join this "superforce" (and I suppose make it a super-superforce). However, whether this does (or even should) occur is not known.

Lastly -- your question about the expansion. Since we don't know the physics of the Planck era, we don't know how the universe was behaving -- we have no idea if it was expanding, contracting, or just sitting idly. However, after the Planck time, the universe was expanding. At this time, Einstein's special relativity is certainly applicable, and so we expect all particles to obey the speed limit v < c. Particles can't move a light year per second, so perhaps there was more to that story. What can happen, is that two particles can have relative velocities that surpass that of light.This is of course still troubling from the perspective of special relativity. However, everything is OK, and here's why: the particles themselves are at rest in space -- it is the space itself that is expanding, causing these particles to separate. There are no rules limiting the speed at which space itself can expand. In cosmology, we often see particles zipping apart from each other at speeds greater than that of light.
 
  • #4
But I thought light was not relative.
Didn't Einstein say that if an object was going even a mps off the speed of light the speed of light would remain c distance away from the velocity of the second body. Light is not relative top anything, and is always C, regardless of the motion of the observer. I thought that was why it was called the universal constant as if it was relative it would never actually be at the speed C if the observers frame was important.
 
  • #5
bapowell said:
However, current physical theories are capable of describing the universe after the Planck time. These theories are consistent with a universe in which 3 of the fundamental forces (electromagnetic, strong & weak nuclear) were unified into a single "superforce". It is conjectured that if we were to rewind the tape all the way back to the Planck time, gravity would join this "superforce" (and I suppose make it a super-superforce). However, whether this does (or even should) occur is not known.

I hope they won't call it a super-superforce :-)

Anyway, there is quite a bit of speculation involved when extrapolating the Standard Model from TeV scales up to the proposed GUT scale (not to mention the Planck scale). Much new physics can occur in that range that is not taken into account in this extrapolation.

I for one do not trust cosmological statements about how the universe evolved when its energy density was above the energies that we are currently able to probe. I'm not sure what time that was, though.

Torquil
 
  • #6
Torquil,

You're absolutely right to be skeptical. Personally, I'm moved by the MSSM's unification of the coupling constants at around 1016 GeV. From a symmetry restoration perspective, I'm inclined to think that some form of unification occurred for the gauge forces. I'm not sold on gravity though...
 
  • #7
HarryDaniels: in your original post you write: But from other reading I have read that this "Planck time" only existed for perhaps a millionth of a yontosecond.

I think you meant to say “yoctosecond”, which equals 10^-24 second.
 
  • #8
The biggest part of expansion most likely occurred between t=0 and t= 10^-24
 
  • #9
HarryDaniels said:
I heard that there was not four fundamental forces, just one, or superforce. I also heard that the laws of physics did not apply.

It's likely that some set of laws of physics did apply. We just aren't sure what they were.

According to Einstein, nothing can travel faster than light, so that law of physics did not apply at this point.

Einstein never said that nothing can travel faster than light. This rule is a simplification of what he actually did say.
 
  • #10
HarryDaniels said:
Didn't Einstein say that if an object was going even a mps off the speed of light the speed of light would remain c distance away from the velocity of the second body.

Yes. That's the basic rule. But that rule doesn't translate into "you can't have objects move away from each other at faster than the speed of light."
 
  • #11
One thing important point here is that the massive expansion of the universe (a.k.a inflation) happened quite a bit later than Planck's time. Planck's time is 10^-44 seconds, whereas inflation happened before 10^-32.
 

Related to Exploring the Big Bang: Unveiling the Unknowns

What is the Big Bang theory?

The Big Bang theory is a scientific explanation for the origin and evolution of the universe. It proposes that the universe began as a single point of infinite density and has been expanding and cooling over the past 13.8 billion years.

How did the Big Bang happen?

According to the Big Bang theory, the universe began with a singularity, a point of infinite density and temperature. This singularity then rapidly expanded in an event known as the Big Bang, creating the fundamental forces and particles that make up our universe.

What evidence supports the Big Bang theory?

There are several pieces of evidence that support the Big Bang theory, including the observation of the cosmic microwave background radiation, the abundance of light elements in the universe, and the redshift of galaxies. Additionally, the Big Bang theory is consistent with the laws of physics and has been successful in predicting and explaining various phenomena in the universe.

What are the unknowns of the Big Bang theory?

While the Big Bang theory has been widely accepted by the scientific community, there are still some unknowns and unanswered questions. These include the exact cause of the Big Bang, the nature of dark matter and dark energy, and the ultimate fate of the universe.

How does the Big Bang theory impact our understanding of the universe?

The Big Bang theory has greatly impacted our understanding of the universe and has led to many advancements in cosmology and astrophysics. It has allowed us to understand the origins of the universe and its evolution, as well as the formation of galaxies, stars, and planets. The Big Bang theory also provides a framework for studying and exploring other mysteries of the universe, such as black holes and the search for extraterrestrial life.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Cosmology
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
43
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
940
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • Cosmology
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top