Exploring Antimatter Particles: Can They Be Used as Weapons?

In summary: Antiparticles would have to come into contact with air at very close range in order to do any damage.
  • #1
Xtensity
104
0
I'm no expert in particle physics, I only know some of the basics, though I do plan on going into this field for a PhD in the future, which will probably take another year before I begin it...

Would a beam of antimatter particles, either made up of only 1 type of particle, or a mix of particles, explode instantly the second they were created?

Like if there was a way to use use antiparticles as weapons, would it even be possible except in like a bomb form? If antiparticles instantly release a ton of energy when coming in contact with the respective normal particle, would a beam, or a gun that shoots such a beam, blow up instantly upon firing?

I can understand about making a bomb if we could somehow utilize them in a large enough amount... but what about beams? I know this is basically Science Fiction at the moment, but theoretically what are the issues with such a device? I'm just posting this because I'm curious on how they would behave in the above described manner.

Post any potential theoretical models you might have in mind also, I am very curious about these things because they are interesting to think about, since sometime in the future it may be possible.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Unlike antiparticles, air is regular matter. A beam would not go very far. Actually, a beam of regular matter doesn't go very far either, whether it is a cathode ray, the helium that would come out of a pierced balloon, or the exhaust gas of a car. If you want the least amount of range, you need vacuum.
 
  • #3
Well that's with todays technology. Who knows what kind of advances we can make in the future... though aside the fact that the beam wouldn't go far... if we somehow discovered a way to propel a beam of particles with enough force out of say something the size of a Turret gun(irrelevant to this hypothetical situation), could such a beam be used to obliterate objects depending on what kind of antiparticle beam could be fired?

Ignoring the fact that as far as we know today, it wouldn't go far at all, just hypothetical...
 
  • #4
Xtensity said:
I'm no expert in particle physics, I only know some of the basics, though I do plan on going into this field for a PhD in the future, which will probably take another year before I begin it...

Would a beam of antimatter particles, either made up of only 1 type of particle, or a mix of particles, explode instantly the second they were created?
No, why would you think that would happen? They'd keep going until they ran into normal matter.
Xtensity said:
Like if there was a way to use use antiparticles as weapons, would it even be possible except in like a bomb form? If antiparticles instantly release a ton of energy when coming in contact with the respective normal particle, would a beam, or a gun that shoots such a beam, blow up instantly upon firing?
Not unless you let the antimatter come in contact with the gun. In practice, you'd probably use magnetic fields for containment and isolation.

Ever heard of the Tevatron? Or LEP?* They're basically antimatter guns (although not of the sort you could stick in a holster and carry around :wink:).

*more precisely, the Tevatron's Antiproton Source and LEP's positron converter
 
  • #5
Diazona, the air is made up of matter. I would assume a particle accelerators smashing sub atomic particles has a pretty good vacuum... though I'm talking about for practical applications.

I'm thinking any kind of anti-particle possible of colliding and exploding organic objects would obliterate the instant it hit simple air(inside/out the the weapon). At least unless there was some way to make them smart :P.
 
  • #6
Yes, particle accelerators do operate in a high vacuum. And yes, antiparticles fired out of a gun into the atmosphere would annihilate the moment they came into contact with air. But that's not "instantly upon firing".
 

Related to Exploring Antimatter Particles: Can They Be Used as Weapons?

What is antimatter and how is it different from regular matter?

Antimatter is a type of matter that is composed of antiparticles, which have the same mass as regular particles but opposite charge. For example, the antiparticle of an electron is a positron, which has a positive charge instead of a negative one. When matter and antimatter particles come into contact, they annihilate each other, releasing a large amount of energy.

Can antimatter particles be used as weapons?

While antimatter does have the potential to be used as a powerful energy source, it is currently not feasible to use it as a weapon due to the challenges of producing and storing enough antimatter to be effective. Additionally, the cost and ethical implications of using such a destructive weapon would likely outweigh any potential benefits.

What is the current research on antimatter particles?

Scientists are actively studying antimatter particles in order to better understand their properties and potential applications. This research includes experiments at particle accelerators, such as the Large Hadron Collider, as well as theoretical studies to explore the nature of antimatter and its interactions with regular matter.

How is antimatter being used in practical applications?

While antimatter is not currently being used as a weapon, it does have some practical applications. For example, positron emission tomography (PET) scans use antimatter particles to create images of the human body, and antimatter is also being studied as a potential energy source for space travel.

What are the potential dangers of antimatter research?

There are some potential dangers associated with antimatter research, including the possibility of accidental release of antimatter and the potential for antimatter to be used as a weapon. However, scientists have strict safety protocols in place to prevent these risks and ensure the safe handling and use of antimatter particles.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top