Evaluations of the higher order Polygamma functions

In summary, in this conversation we discussed the evaluation of higher order Polygamma functions at small rational arguments, including the use of the reflection formula and the duplication formula. We also derived explicit expressions for the Dirichlet Beta functions of odd integer argument in terms of the Polygamma function.
  • #1
DreamWeaver
303
0
In this brief tutorial we evaluate the Trigamma, Tetragamma, and other higher order Polygamma functions at small rational arguments:\(\displaystyle (01) \quad \psi_{m \ge 1}(z) = (-1)^{m+1}m!\, \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(k+z)^{m+1}}\)We will have frequent need of the reflection formula, which is obtained by repeated differentiation of the reflection formula for the Digamma function:\(\displaystyle (02) \quad \psi_0(z) - \psi_0(1-z) = -\pi\cot \pi z \, \Rightarrow\)\(\displaystyle (03) \quad \psi_{m \ge 1}(z) + (-1)^{m+1}\psi_{m \ge 1}(1-z) = -\frac{d^m}{dz^m}\, \pi\cot \pi z\)From the definition (01) above, we have the trivial case:\(\displaystyle (04) \quad \psi_{m\ge 1}(1) = (-1)^{m+1}m!\, \zeta(m+1)\). Hence\(\displaystyle \psi_1(1) = \zeta(2)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_2(1) = -2\, \zeta(3)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_3(1) = 6\, \zeta(4)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_4(1) = -24\, \zeta(5)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_5(1) = 120\, \zeta(6)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_6(1) = -720\, \zeta(7)\)
The case for \(\displaystyle z=1/2\) is equally straightforward. Setting \(\displaystyle z=1/2\) in (01) above we get:\(\displaystyle \psi_{m \ge 1} \left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) = (-1)^{m+1}m!\, \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(k+1/2)^{m+1}}=
(-1)^{m+1}2^{m+1}\,m!\, \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(2k+1)^{m+1}} \equiv\)\(\displaystyle (-1)^{m+1}2^{m+1}\,m!\, \left[ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^{m+1}} - \frac{1}{2^{m+1}}\, \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^{m+1}} \right]=\)\(\displaystyle (-1)^{m+1}2^{m+1}\,m!\, \left[ \left(1-\frac{1}{2^{m+1}} \right) \, \zeta(m+1) \right]\)
Hence\(\displaystyle (05) \quad \psi_{m\ge 1}\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) = (-1)^{m+1}(2^{m+1}-1)\,m!\, \zeta(m+1)\). and\(\displaystyle \psi_1\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) = 3\zeta(2)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_2\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) = -14\, \zeta(3)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_3\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) = 90\, \zeta(4)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_4\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) = -744\, \zeta(5)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_5\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) = 7560\, \zeta(6)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_6\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) = -91440\, \zeta(7)\)

Comments and/or questions should be posted here:

http://mathhelpboards.com/commentary-threads-53/commentary-evaluations-higher-order-polygamma-functions-8174.html
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For a number of rational arguments whose denominator is \(\displaystyle \ge 3\), we will need the duplication formula. This is obtained directly from the Legendre Duplication Formula for the Gamma function:\(\displaystyle (06) \quad \Gamma(2z)=\frac{2^{2z-1}}{\sqrt{\pi}}\,\Gamma(z)\,\Gamma\left( \tfrac{1}{2}+z\right)\)
Taking the logarithm of both sides, and then differentiating, we obtain the duplication formula for the Digamma function:\(\displaystyle \frac{d}{dz} \log\Gamma(2z) = 2\, \psi_0(2z) =\) \(\displaystyle \frac{d}{dz} \Bigg\{ -\frac{1}{2}\log \pi+ (2z-1)\log 2 + \log \Gamma(z) +\log\Gamma\left( \tfrac{1}{2}+z\right) \Bigg\}=\)\(\displaystyle 2\log 2 + \psi_0(z)+\psi_0\left( \tfrac{1}{2}+z\right)\)
Next, with the understanding that \(\displaystyle m\ge 1\), we differentiate both sides m-times to obtain:
\(\displaystyle (07) \quad 2^{m+1}\psi_{m\ge 1}(2z)= \psi_{m\ge 1}(z)+\psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{1}{2}+z\right)\)
---------------------------------------
Setting \(\displaystyle z=1/4\) in the duplication formula above gives:\(\displaystyle 2^{m+1}\psi_{m\ge 1} \left( \tfrac{1}{2} \right) = \psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right)+
\psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right)\)Having already found a neat closed form for the 'half-argument' (\(\displaystyle z=1/2\)), we can write this as:\(\displaystyle \psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right)+
\psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right)= (-1)^{m+1}2^{m+1}(2^{m+1}-1)\, m!\, \zeta(m+1)\)Next, we consider the difference of Polygammas:\(\displaystyle \psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right)-
\psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right)= (-1)^{m+1}m!\, \Bigg\{ \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(k+1/4)^{m+1}} -
\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(k+3/4)^{m+1}}
\Bigg\}=\)\(\displaystyle (-1)^{m+1}2^{2m+2}\, m!\, \Bigg\{
\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(4k+1)^{m+1}} -
\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(4k+3)^{m+1}}
\Bigg\}=\)\(\displaystyle (-1)^{m+1}2^{2m+2}\, m!\,
\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^k}{(2k+1)^{m+1}}\)That last (alternating) series is a special case of the Dirichlet Beta function:\(\displaystyle \beta(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^k}{(2k+1)^x}\)Thus\(\displaystyle \psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right)+
\psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right)= (-1)^{m+1}2^{m+1}(2^{m+1}-1)\, m!\, \zeta(m+1)\)and\(\displaystyle \psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right)-
\psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right)= (-1)^{m+1}2^{2m+2}\, m!\, \beta(m+1)\)
Adding, respectively subtracting, those last two expressions gives
\(\displaystyle \psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right) = (-1)^{m+1}2^{m}\,m!\, \Bigg[ (2^{m+1}-1)\, \zeta(m+1) + 2^{m+1}\, \beta(m+1) \Bigg]\)
\(\displaystyle \psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right) = (-1)^{m+1}2^{m}\,m!\, \Bigg[ (2^{m+1}-1)\, \zeta(m+1) - 2^{m+1}\, \beta(m+1) \Bigg]\)
Thus\(\displaystyle \psi_{1}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right) = 6\,\zeta(2) + 8\,\beta(2) = \pi^2 + 8 G\)\(\displaystyle \psi_{1}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right) = 6\,\zeta(2) - 8\,\beta(2) = \pi^2 - 8 G\)\(\displaystyle \psi_{2}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right) = -56\,\zeta(3) - 64\,\beta(3) \)\(\displaystyle \psi_{2}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right) = -56\,\zeta(3) + 64\,\beta(3) \)\(\displaystyle \psi_{3}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right) = 720\,\zeta(4) + 768\,\beta(4) = \frac{\pi^4}{8
} + 768\, \beta(4)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_{3}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right) = 720\,\zeta(4) - 768\,\beta(4) = \frac{\pi^4}{8
} - 768\, \beta(4)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_{4}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right) = -11904\,\zeta(5) - 12288\,\beta(5)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_{4}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right) = -11904\,\zeta(5) + 12288\,\beta(5)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_{5}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right) = 241920\,\zeta(6) + 245760\,\beta(6) = \frac{\pi^6}{256}+ 245760\,\beta(6)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_{5}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right) = 241920\,\zeta(6) - 245760\,\beta(6) = \frac{\pi^6}{256}- 245760\,\beta(6)\)\(\displaystyle \psi_{6}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right) = -5852160\,\zeta(7) - 5898240\,\beta(7) \)\(\displaystyle \psi_{6}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right) = -5852160\,\zeta(7) + 5898240\,\beta(7) \)
Where I've used the classic Riemann Zeta values:\(\displaystyle \zeta(2) = \frac{\pi^2}{6}\)\(\displaystyle \zeta(4) = \frac{\pi^4}{90}\)\(\displaystyle \zeta(6) = \frac{\pi^6}{945}\)
 
  • #3
As an aside, it's worth noting that the Dirichlet Beta functions of odd integer argument - \(\displaystyle \beta(1), \, \beta(3), \, \beta(5), \, \beta(7),\) etc - can be evaluated explicitly by appealing to properties of the Polygamma function. On the one hand, we have\(\displaystyle \psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right)-
\psi_{m\ge 1}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right)= (-1)^{m+1}2^{2m+2}\, m!\, \beta(m+1) \, \Rightarrow\)\(\displaystyle \psi_{2m}\left( \tfrac{1}{4} \right)-
\psi_{2m}\left( \tfrac{3}{4} \right)= -2^{4m+2}\, (2m)!\, \beta(2m+1) \)Whereas on the other, the reflection formula - for \(\displaystyle m \ge 1\) - gives:\(\displaystyle \psi_{2m}(z)-\psi_{2m}(1-z) = - \frac{d^{2m}}{dz^{2m}}\, \pi\cot \pi z\)Setting \(\displaystyle z=1/4\) in that last relation, and equating it with the previous one gives:\(\displaystyle \beta(2m+1) = \frac{1}{2^{4m+2}\,(2m)!} \, \frac{d^{2m}}{dz^{2m}}\, \pi\cot \pi z \, \Bigg|_{z=1/4}\)Although here we are primarily concerned with the higher order Polygamma functions, it's worth noting that all of the relations above hold for the Digamma function. Hence the first few Dirichlet Beta functions of odd order are\(\displaystyle \beta(1) = \frac{\pi}{4}\)\(\displaystyle \beta(3) = \frac{\pi^3}{32}\)\(\displaystyle \beta(5) = \frac{5\pi^5}{1536}\)\(\displaystyle \beta(7) = \frac{61\pi^7}{184320}\)
 
  • #4
In order to evaluate Polygamma functions whose (rational) arguments have a denominator \(\displaystyle > 4\), a little more sophistry is required. To start with, we need to split the Polygammas into two distinct groups; one group for oddly indexed Polygammas, and one for evenly indexed Polygammas. The reason for this is that they will - in part - be evaluated in terms of Clausen functions, a function that itself differes according to parity.

Again, with the understanding that \(\displaystyle m \in \mathbb{Z} \ge 1\):\(\displaystyle \text{Cl}_{2m}(\theta) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\sin k\theta}{k^{2m}}\)\(\displaystyle \text{Cl}_{2m+1}(\theta) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\cos k\theta}{k^{2m+1}}\)

Here's a brief sketch of the evaluation process...

Taking \(\displaystyle z=1/3\) as an example, we express the Clausen function \(\displaystyle \text{Cl}_n(\pi z) = \text{Cl}_n(\pi/3)\) as a sum/difference of \(\displaystyle 6\) partial sums, each of which is expressible as an \(\displaystyle (n-1)\) order Polygamma function. This gives us one relation connecting the values of \(\displaystyle \psi_{n-1}\left( \tfrac{1}{6} \right), \, \psi_{n-1}\left( \tfrac{1}{3} \right), \, \psi_{n-1}\left( \tfrac{2}{3} \right), \,\) and \(\displaystyle \psi_{n-1}\left( \tfrac{5}{6} \right)\).

To get a second relation, we express the Riemann Zeta function of order \(\displaystyle n\) as a sum of Polygamma functions of order \(\displaystyle (n-1)\):\(\displaystyle \zeta(n) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^n} = \sum_{j=1}^6 \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(6k+j)^n}\)To obtain a third relation connecting the very same arguments, we set \(\displaystyle z=1/3\) in the Legendre-type duplication formula for the Polygamma function. If required, we also apply the reflection formula. The end result will be a direct evaluation for \(\displaystyle \psi_{n-1}\left( \tfrac{1}{6} \right), \, \psi_{n-1}\left( \tfrac{1}{3} \right), \, \psi_{n-1}\left( \tfrac{2}{3} \right), \,\) and \(\displaystyle \psi_{n-1}\left( \tfrac{5}{6} \right)\).

In cases where the denominator of the argument is slightly larger, say \(\displaystyle z=1/8\), or \(\displaystyle z=1/12\), we might require yet another (different!) relation linking related arguments of the Polygamma. One way around this problem is to set up a second correlation between Polygammas and a Clausen function of a different argument. In the 8-case, for example, we might consider\(\displaystyle \text{Cl}_n\left( \frac{\pi}{8} \right) = \sum_{j=1}^7 a_j\, \psi_{n-1}\left( \frac{j}{8} \right)\)and\(\displaystyle \text{Cl}_n\left( \frac{3\pi}{8} \right) = \sum_{j=1}^7 b_j\, \psi_{n-1}\left( \frac{j}{8} \right)\)In even higher order cases, we might set up a third Clausen function relation, although obviously we will endeavour to express Polygammas in as few Clausen functions as possible.That said, back to an evaluation... brb (Heidy)
 
  • #5
Let \(\displaystyle m \ge 1\), then we consider the sum\(\displaystyle \text{Cl}_{2m}\left( \frac{\pi}{3} \right) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{ \sin (\pi k/3) }{k^{2m}}\)By considering the first six terms, second six terms, third six terms, etc., we note that the first term in each sextet has coefficient \(\displaystyle \sin(\pi/3)\), the second, \(\displaystyle \sin(2\pi/3)\), etc. Indeed, each sextet is characterised by the following coefficients:\(\displaystyle \sin(\pi/3);\, \sin(2\pi/3); \, \sin(3\pi/3);\, \sin(4\pi/3); \, \sin(5\pi/3);\, \sin(6\pi/3) = \)\(\displaystyle \sin(\pi/3);\, \sin(2\pi/3); \, \sin(\pi);\, \sin(4\pi/3); \, \sin(5\pi/3);\, \sin(2\pi) \, \equiv\)\(\displaystyle \sin(\pi/3);\, \sin(2\pi/3); \, \sin(\pi);\, -\sin(2\pi/3); \, -\sin(\pi/3);\, \sin(2\pi) \, \equiv\)\(\displaystyle \sin(\pi/3);\, \sin(2\pi/3); \, 0;\, -\sin(2\pi/3); \, -\sin(\pi/3);\, 0 \, \equiv\)\(\displaystyle \sin(\pi/3);\, \sin(\pi/3); \, 0;\, -\sin(\pi/3); \, -\sin(\pi/3);\, 0 \, \equiv\)
Thus\(\displaystyle \text{Cl}_{2m}\left( \frac{\pi}{3} \right) = \)\(\displaystyle \sin \left(\frac{\pi}{3}\right) \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1 }{(6k+1)^{2m}} +
\sin \left(\frac{\pi}{3}\right) \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1 }{(6k+2)^{2m}} -\)\(\displaystyle \sin \left(\frac{\pi}{3}\right) \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1 }{(6k+4)^{2m}} -
\sin \left(\frac{\pi}{3}\right) \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1 }{(6k+5)^{2m}} = \)
\(\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2\, (6^{2m})}\,\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \Bigg\{
\frac{1 }{(k+1/6)^{2m}}+
\frac{1 }{(k+1/3)^{2m}}-
\frac{1 }{(k+2/3)^{2m}}-
\frac{1 }{(k+5/6)^{2m}}
\Bigg\}=\)\(\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2\, (6^{2m})}\, \frac{(-1)^{2m}}{(2m-1)!}\, \Bigg\{
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{6}\right) +
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{3}\right) -
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) -
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{5}{6}\right)
\Bigg\}
\)So our first relation is:
\(\displaystyle (08) \quad \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{6}\right) +
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{3}\right) -
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) -
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{5}{6}\right) = \)\(\displaystyle \frac{2\, (6^{2m})\, (2m-1)!}{ \sqrt{3} } \, \text{Cl}_{2m}\left( \frac{\pi}{3} \right)\)

---------------------------------------
For the second relation, we write:\(\displaystyle \zeta(2m) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k^{2m}} \equiv \sum_{j=1}^6\, \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(6k+j)^{2m}} =\)\(\displaystyle \frac{1}{6^{2m}}\, \sum_{j=1}^6\, \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(k+j/6)^{2m}} =\)\(\displaystyle \frac{1}{6^{2m}\, (2m-1)! }\, \sum_{j=1}^6\, \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{j}{6}\right) \, \Rightarrow\)\(\displaystyle 6^{2m}\, (2m-1)!\, \zeta(2m) = \sum_{j=1}^6\, \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{j}{6}\right) = \)\(\displaystyle \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) + \psi_{2m-1}\left(1\right) + \sum_{j=1, 2, 4, 5}\, \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{j}{6}\right)=\)\(\displaystyle (2m-1)! \, \zeta(2m) + (2^{2m} - 1)\,(2m-1)! \, \zeta(2m) +
\sum_{j=1, 2, 4, 5}\, \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{j}{6}\right)=\)\(\displaystyle 2^{2m}\, (2m-1)! \, \zeta(2m) +
\sum_{j=1, 2, 4, 5}\, \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{j}{6}\right)\)Hence\(\displaystyle \sum_{j=1, 2, 4, 5}\, \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{j}{6}\right) = (6^{2m}-2^{2m})\, (2m-1)!\, \zeta(2m)\)Or equivalently\(\displaystyle (09) \quad \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{6}\right) +
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{3}\right) +
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) +
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{5}{6}\right) =\)\(\displaystyle 2^{2m}(3^{2m}-1)\, (2m-1)!\, \zeta(2m)\)

---------------------------------------
Adding and subtracting the Polygamma relations (08) and (09) gives:\(\displaystyle (10) \quad \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{6}\right) +
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{3}\right) = \)\(\displaystyle 2^{2m-1}(3^{2m}-1)\, (2m-1)!\, \zeta(2m) +
\frac{(6^{2m})\, (2m-1)!}{ \sqrt{3} } \, \text{Cl}_{2m}\left( \frac{\pi}{3} \right)
\)and\(\displaystyle (11) \quad \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) +
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{5}{6}\right) = \)\(\displaystyle 2^{2m-1}(3^{2m}-1)\, (2m-1)!\, \zeta(2m) -
\frac{(6^{2m})\, (2m-1)!}{ \sqrt{3} } \, \text{Cl}_{2m}\left( \frac{\pi}{3} \right)
\)

Almost done... (Heidy)
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Setting \(\displaystyle z=1/6\) in the Legendre-type duplication formula - (07) above - we get:\(\displaystyle 2^{2m} \, \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{3}\right) = \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{6}\right) + \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)\)Rearranging the terms to...\(\displaystyle \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{6}\right) = \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) - 2^{2m} \, \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{3}\right) \)...and then substituting this back into (10) gives:\(\displaystyle (12) \quad
\psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) + (1-2^{2m}) \, \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{3}\right) =\)\(\displaystyle 2^{2m-1}\, (3^{2m}-1)\, (2m-1)!\, \zeta(2m) + \frac{6^{2m}(2m-1)!}{\sqrt{3}}\, \text{Cl}_{2m}\left( \frac{\pi}{3} \right)\)
This is exactly what we were looking for all along; an expression that can be reduced to a single Polygamma function, by use of the reflection formula...\(\displaystyle (13) \quad \psi_{2m-1}\left( \frac{1}{3} \right) +
\psi_{2m-1}\left( \frac{2}{3} \right) = - \frac{d^{2m-1}}{dz^{2m-1}}\, \pi\cot \pi z \, \Bigg|_{z=1/3}\)Subtracting \(\displaystyle (13)\) from \(\displaystyle (12)\) gives:\(\displaystyle \psi_{2m-1}\left( \frac{1}{3} \right) = \)\(\displaystyle - \frac{1}{2^{2m}}\, \Bigg\{
2^{2m-1}\, (3^{2m}-1)\, (2m-1)!\, \zeta(2m) + \frac{6^{2m}(2m-1)!}{\sqrt{3}}\, \text{Cl}_{2m}\left( \frac{\pi}{3} \right)
+
\frac{d^{2m-1}}{dz^{2m-1}}\, \pi\cot \pi z \, \Bigg|_{z=1/3}
\Bigg\}=\)\(\displaystyle -\frac{3^{2m}\, (2m-1)!}{2} \Bigg\{ (1-3^{-2m})\, \zeta(2m) + \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\,\text{Cl}_{2m}\left( \frac{\pi}{3}\right) \,
\Bigg\} -
\frac{1}{2^{2m}}\,\frac{d^{2m-1}}{dz^{2m-1}}\, \pi\cot \pi z \, \Bigg|_{z=1/3}\)---------------------------------------

\(\displaystyle (14) \quad \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{1}{3}\right) = -\frac{1}{2^{2m}}\,\frac{d^{2m-1}}{dz^{2m-1}}\, \pi\cot \pi z \, \Bigg|_{z=1/3}\)\(\displaystyle -\frac{3^{2m}\, (2m-1)!}{2} \Bigg\{ (1-3^{-2m})\, \zeta(2m) + \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\,\text{Cl}_{2m}\left( \frac{\pi}{3}\right) \,
\Bigg\}
\)

\(\displaystyle (15) \quad \psi_{2m-1}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) = \frac{(1-2^{2m})}{2^{2m}}\,\frac{d^{2m-1}}{dz^{2m-1}}\, \pi\cot \pi z \, \Bigg|_{z=1/3}\)\(\displaystyle + \frac{3^{2m}\, (2m-1)!}{2} \Bigg\{ (1-3^{-2m})\, \zeta(2m) + \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\,\text{Cl}_{2m}\left( \frac{\pi}{3}\right) \,
\Bigg\}
\)

More soon... ish. (Heidy)
 

Related to Evaluations of the higher order Polygamma functions

1. What are higher order Polygamma functions?

Higher order Polygamma functions, also known as generalized Polygamma functions, are mathematical functions that are defined as derivatives of the digamma function. They are used in various areas of mathematics, such as number theory and complex analysis.

2. What is the purpose of evaluating higher order Polygamma functions?

Evaluating higher order Polygamma functions allows for the calculation of complex integrals and series, as well as the solution of differential equations. They are also useful in the study of special functions and their properties.

3. How are higher order Polygamma functions calculated?

Higher order Polygamma functions can be calculated using various methods, such as series expansions, asymptotic approximations, and recurrence relations. In some cases, they can also be expressed in terms of other special functions.

4. What are the applications of higher order Polygamma functions?

Higher order Polygamma functions have applications in many fields of mathematics, including number theory, combinatorics, and physics. They are also used in statistical analysis and in solving problems in electrostatics and quantum mechanics.

5. Are there any special properties of higher order Polygamma functions?

Yes, higher order Polygamma functions have various special properties, such as functional equations, symmetry properties, and connections to other special functions. They also have interesting relationships with prime numbers and can be used to generalize well-known identities and theorems.

Similar threads

  • Math Guides, Tutorials and Articles
Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
750
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
526
  • Math Guides, Tutorials and Articles
Replies
19
Views
18K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Math Guides, Tutorials and Articles
Replies
6
Views
13K
Back
Top