Equation of motion for isotropic harmonic oscillator

In summary, the problem provides a mass point under the influence of a central force and asks for the equation of motion in terms of angular momentum. The potential and equations of motion are determined, and the total energy equation is manipulated to eliminate time derivatives. It is then shown that for a circle, the radial acceleration must be zero, leading to the conclusion that the total energy must be equal to the effective potential.
  • #1
JulienB
408
12

Homework Statement



Hi everybody! I'm a bit stuck in this problem, hopefully someone can help me to make progress there:

A mass point ##m## is under the influence of a central force ##\vec{F} = - k \cdot \vec{x}## with ##x > 0##.
a) Determine the equation of motion ##r = r(\varphi)## for the angular momentum ##|\vec{L}| \neq 0##.
b) For which value of ##E## do we have a circle?

Homework Equations



Lagrange equations, ##E = T+V##, ##V_{eff} = V(\vec{r}) + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2}##

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay so first I determined the potential:

##V(\vec{r}) = \int_{|\vec{r}|}^{0} -kr dr = \frac{1}{2} k r^2##

Then I found the equations of motion

##\ddot{r} = r\dot{\varphi}^2 - \frac{k}{m}r## and
##\ddot{\varphi} = \frac{2}{r} \dot{r} \dot{\varphi}##

and I can deduce

##\frac{\partial V}{\partial t} = 0 \implies E = const.## and
##\frac{\partial L}{\partial \varphi} = 0 \implies \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\varphi}} = 0 \implies \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\varphi}} = mr^2 \dot{\varphi} = L = const.##

so I can rewrite ##\dot{r}## as

##\dot{r} = \frac{dr}{dt} = \frac{dr}{d\varphi} \dot{\varphi} = \frac{dr}{d\varphi} \frac{L}{mr^2}##

which I can substitute in my ##E##:

##E = \frac{1}{2} \frac{L^2}{mr^4} \bigg(\frac{dr}{d\varphi}\bigg)^2 + V_{eff}##

and after a few manipulations I get:

##\varphi = \pm \frac{L}{\sqrt{2m}} \int \frac{dr}{r^2 \sqrt{E - V_{eff}}}##

And that's where I get stuck. ##E## and ##L## are constants but surely ##V_{eff}## is not. In the Kepler problem we substitute with ##u = \frac{1}{r}## but if I am not wrong it is not working in the case of a simple oscillator. Any suggestion?Thanks in advance for your answers, I appreciate it!Julien.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I suggest that you instead look at the equation for the total energy, which as you say has to be constant. What happens when ##\dot r = 0##?
 
  • #3
Thanks a lot for your answer. When ##\dot{r} = 0## then ##E = V_{eff}## I would assume. But isn't that the answer to question b? If I should use that for a, I don't see how for the moment.Julien
 
  • #4
You are asked to find the EoM, not to solve it.
 
  • #5
Hi @Orodruin and thank you for your answer. Yes but I am asked for the equation of motion in function of ##\varphi##, and I am not sure to understand what you suggest with ##\dot{r} = 0##, because that happens only at the farthest and closest points of the elliptic path to the center right? Well unless it is a circle, then ##\dot{r} = 0## at every point and ##\dot{r} = const##.

I think I am missing something in my understanding of the problem.Julien.
 
  • #6
The energy equation you have is the equation of motion for r as a function of phi, there is no time in it. The effective potential depends only on r.

The ##\dot r=0## applies to (b).
 
  • #7
Wait, really? I don't think I'm supposed to have ##\dot{r}## or ##\dot{\varphi}## in my equation though or? I can rewrite ##mr^2\dot{\varphi}^2## with L, but one ##\dot{\varphi}## remains and that doesn't resolve the issue with ##\dot{r}##.

EDIT: btw my ##E## is

##E = \frac{1}{2} m (\dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\varphi}^2) + \frac{1}{2} kr^2##.

Maybe there is a mistake there?

Thanks a lot for all your help.Julien.
 
  • #8
Indeed you should not have time derivatives in your EoM, but you have already gotten rid of them ...
JulienB said:
which I can substitute in my EEE:

E=12L2mr4(drdφ)2+VeffE=12L2mr4(drdφ)2+VeffE = \frac{1}{2} \frac{L^2}{mr^4} \bigg(\frac{dr}{d\varphi}\bigg)^2 + V_{eff}
 
  • #9
I have so little self confidence that I thought everything was wrong :D like always when you get the solution, it all makes sense now. ;)

Okay that's what I get now:

##dr^2 = (E - V_{eff}) \frac{2 m r^4}{L^2} d\varphi^2 ##
##dr = \pm \frac{r^2}{L} \sqrt{2m(E - V_{eff})} d\varphi##
##\frac{1}{r} =\pm \frac{1}{L} \sqrt{2m(E - V_{eff})} \int d\varphi##
##r = \pm \frac{L \varphi}{\sqrt{2m(E - V_{eff})}}##

Is that correct now? The ##\pm## is accessory I guess as ##r## is a distance. Thanks a lot.

Julien.
 
  • #10
You cannot integrate it that easily, r depends on phi! Anyway, you do not need to. Only the EoM was sought, not the solution to the EoM.
 
  • #11
Mm can I then present it that way?

##r = \pm \int \frac{L}{\sqrt{2m(E - V_{eff})}} d\varphi##
 
  • #12
JulienB said:
Mm can I then present it that way?

##r = \pm \int \frac{L}{\sqrt{2m(E - V_{eff})}} d\varphi##
That is formally the solution to the EoM, not the EoM. I do not understand why you insist on solving the EoM - the problem just asks you to find the EoM.
 
  • #13
Sorry, I'm not trying to solve it, I'm just not sure how to present an equation of motion in that context. May I reveal my ignorance by directly asking which form would be considered the equation of motion there? Simply ##E = \frac{1}{2} \frac{L^2}{mr^4} \bigg( \frac{dr}{d\varphi}\bigg)^2 + V_{eff}## ?

Thanks a lot for your patience.

Julien.
 
  • #14
Is it a differential equation describing how r varies with phi?
 
  • #15
Nope! :) Then it is probably:

##\frac{d}{d\varphi} \frac{1}{r} = \pm \frac{1}{L} \sqrt{2m(E - V_{eff})}##

Maybe I shouldn't have moved the ##r^2## to the left side? If it is correct, what is the policy about the ##\pm##? Should I just drop it because it is a distance and ##E - V_{eff} > 0##?
 
  • #16
JulienB said:
Nope! :) Then it is probably:
Yes it is...
 
  • #17
Okay, thanks a lot and sorry for struggling to get it. For b I'd say that for the path to be a circle, the radial acceleration must be zero hence ##\dot{r} = 0##, which means ##E = V_{eff}##.

Hopefully this is right, thanks a lot for helping me.Julien.
 
Last edited:

Related to Equation of motion for isotropic harmonic oscillator

1. What is the equation of motion for an isotropic harmonic oscillator?

The equation of motion for an isotropic harmonic oscillator is m&ddot;x + kx = 0, where m is the mass of the oscillator, &ddot;x is the second derivative of displacement with respect to time, and k is the spring constant.

2. How is the equation of motion derived for an isotropic harmonic oscillator?

The equation of motion for an isotropic harmonic oscillator is derived from Hooke's Law, which states that the force exerted by a spring is directly proportional to the displacement of the spring. This leads to the differential equation F = -kx = m&ddot;x, which can then be rearranged to get the equation of motion.

3. What does the equation of motion tell us about an isotropic harmonic oscillator?

The equation of motion tells us that the acceleration of an isotropic harmonic oscillator is directly proportional to the displacement from equilibrium and is always directed towards the equilibrium point. This means that the oscillator will oscillate back and forth around the equilibrium point with a constant period.

4. How does the mass of the oscillator affect the equation of motion?

The mass of the oscillator affects the equation of motion by changing the inertia of the system. A larger mass will result in a slower oscillation, while a smaller mass will result in a faster oscillation. However, the period of oscillation will remain constant as long as the spring constant stays the same.

5. Can the equation of motion be applied to other systems besides an isotropic harmonic oscillator?

Yes, the equation of motion can be applied to any system that exhibits simple harmonic motion, as long as the restoring force is proportional to the displacement from equilibrium. This includes systems such as pendulums, mass-spring systems, and some types of electrical circuits.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
970
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
282
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
940
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
948
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
488
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
510
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top