- #1
dsdsuster
- 30
- 0
Hello,
I've read through several sources about the EPR Paradox but I'm not sure I'm understanding everything. I know that:
-the paradox in question seems to be due to a violation of the principle of locality
-there is no useful transferred faster than c regardless of which axes the two observers choose to measure along
My primary concern is:
-Why is the example where the two observer's measure along different axes introduced?
From my current understanding, this adds nothing new to the violation of the principle of locality when both observer's are measuring along the same axis. I've read several sources which mention a violation of the principle of uncertainty, with the implication that this is at the crux of the paradox. I don't see any point in the experiment where one can claim to know the spin along more than one axis.
All of this leads me to believe that I am missing a point.
Thank you
I've read through several sources about the EPR Paradox but I'm not sure I'm understanding everything. I know that:
-the paradox in question seems to be due to a violation of the principle of locality
-there is no useful transferred faster than c regardless of which axes the two observers choose to measure along
My primary concern is:
-Why is the example where the two observer's measure along different axes introduced?
From my current understanding, this adds nothing new to the violation of the principle of locality when both observer's are measuring along the same axis. I've read several sources which mention a violation of the principle of uncertainty, with the implication that this is at the crux of the paradox. I don't see any point in the experiment where one can claim to know the spin along more than one axis.
All of this leads me to believe that I am missing a point.
Thank you