- #1
coquelicot
- 299
- 67
Assume a thermodynamic system S entirely isolated from the rest of the world, consisting in a block of salt inside in a tube containing water at some initial temperature. The total calorific energy of S is E. Now, after a time T, the bloc of salt has dissolved itself completely or partially in the water, and this reaction is endothermic, so it goes with a loss of temperature. Finally, the calorific energy of S is E'<E.
First question: where has the energy disapeared?
Second question: I guess that you will answer that it is stored in some form of chemical energy, but if this were true, let us consider the second following problem: suppose that the system now consist in two tubes, one containing the water with the salt, and the second containing only water, at the same initial temperature; again, after a time T, the block of salt has dissolved itself in the water and the temperature of the first tube has decreased, as well as its calorific energy. On the other hand, the temperature of the second tube remains approximately the same. But then, from the difference of temperature, it is possible to create energy, so a part of the calorific energy has been transformed into potential energy. At the same time, "you said" that the energy was transformed into chemical energy, so I have now more energy than was lost!
Well, I believe that all of this is stupid and that there is a simple answer, so, I won't call this a paradox.
I will appreciate some hint.
thx.
First question: where has the energy disapeared?
Second question: I guess that you will answer that it is stored in some form of chemical energy, but if this were true, let us consider the second following problem: suppose that the system now consist in two tubes, one containing the water with the salt, and the second containing only water, at the same initial temperature; again, after a time T, the block of salt has dissolved itself in the water and the temperature of the first tube has decreased, as well as its calorific energy. On the other hand, the temperature of the second tube remains approximately the same. But then, from the difference of temperature, it is possible to create energy, so a part of the calorific energy has been transformed into potential energy. At the same time, "you said" that the energy was transformed into chemical energy, so I have now more energy than was lost!
Well, I believe that all of this is stupid and that there is a simple answer, so, I won't call this a paradox.
I will appreciate some hint.
thx.