Early Catalog of Planet-Hosting Multiple Star (≥ 3) Systems

  • I
  • Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Exoplanets
In summary, a recent catalog has identified approximately 30 triple star systems and one to three quadruple systems with planets. These systems are highly hierarchic and consist of a quasi-binary complemented by a distant stellar component. Most of the stars in these systems are main-sequence stars, with the primary stars tending to be more massive than expected. The majority of planets in these systems have been discovered using the Radial Velocity or Transit method, and there is a mix of gas giants and terrestrial planets. However, the Sun is considered a high-mass star compared to most stars in the Milky Way, being in the top 5% of main-sequence stars. This fact is rarely reported in the media or pop science.
  • #1
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
2023 Award
21,911
6,338
Interesting paper of triple and higher order star systems with planets.

An Early Catalog of Planet Hosting Multiple Star Systems of Order Three and Higher​

https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11346

ABSTRACT - We present a catalog (status July 1, 2022) of triple and higher order systemsidentified containing exoplanets based on data from the literature, including various analyses. We explore statistical properties of the systems with focuson both the stars and the planets. So far, about 30 triple systems and one to three quadruple systems, including (mildly) controversial cases, have been found. The total number of planets is close to 40. All planet-hosting triple star systems are highly hierarchic, consisting of a quasi-binary complemented by a distant stellar component, which is in orbit about the common center of mass. Furthermore, the quadruple systems are in fact pairs of close binaries ("double-doubles"), with one binary harboring a planet. For the different types of star-planet systems, we introduce a template for the classifications of planetary orbital configurations in correspondence to the hierarchy of the system and the planetary host. The data show that almost all stars are main-sequence stars, as expected. However, the stellar primaries tend to be more massive (i.e., corresponding to spectral types A, F, and G) than expected from single star statistics, a finding also valid for stellar secondaries but less pronounced. Tertiary stellar components are almost exclusively low-mass stars of spectral type M. Almost all planets have been discovered based oneither the Radial Velocity or the Transit method. Both gas giants (the dominant type) and terrestrial planets (including super-Earths) have been identified. We anticipate the expansion of this data base in the light of future planetary search missions.

https://phys.org/news/2023-05-astrophysicists-planet-hosting-three-star.html

Interesting comment:
The data show that almost all stars are main-sequence stars, as expected. However, the stellar primaries tend to be more massive (i.e., corresponding to spectral types A, F, and G) than expected from single star statistics, a finding also valid for stellar secondaries but less pronounced. Tertiary stellar components are almost exclusively low-mass stars of spectral type M.
"
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970, Drakkith and DennisN
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
There is a point made with numbers, though these vary. Namely that Sun is a high mass star - it is pointed out that this is rarely stated.
The two statistics they quote are somewhat divergent and not specific to Sun, but Sun is in about top 5% of main sequence stars.
 
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970
  • #3
snorkack said:
There is a point made with numbers, though these vary. Namely that Sun is a high mass star - it is pointed out that this is rarely stated.
The two statistics they quote are somewhat divergent and not specific to Sun, but Sun is in about top 5% of main sequence stars.
Certainly never reported like that in the media or pop sci.

"Average star" Top 5% is not average.

EDIT: from wiki "Sun has an absolute magnitude of +4.83, estimated to be brighter than about 85% of the stars in the Milky Way, most of which are red dwarfs.[30][31] "
 
Last edited:
  • #4
pinball1970 said:
Certainly never reported like that in the media or pop sci.

"Average star" Top 5% is not average.

EDIT: from wiki "Sun has an absolute magnitude of +4.83, estimated to be brighter than about 85% of the stars in the Milky Way, most of which are red dwarfs.[30][31] "
For something that can be analyzed, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_stars_and_brown_dwarfs
which at present covers 20 ly, and does have the disadvantage of being editable (and being Wikipedia)
Grouping by spectral class, I count:
  1. 2 A stars: Sirius A and Altair
  2. 1 F star: Procyon A
  3. 7 G stars. This takes more detailed breakdown... By brightness, α Centauri A, Achird A, and δ Pavonis are brighter than Sun. By mass, Achird A is less massive although brighter. In total, there are thus 6 main sequence stars brighter than Sun, and 5 that are more massive. We are at a total on 10 A, F and G stars combined
  4. 15 K stars
  5. 79 M stars (including the M8 ones)
  6. 2 L brown dwarfs
  7. 16 T brown dwarfs
  8. 4 Y brown dwarfs. Probably not complete (maybe T is not complete either), and not all Y objects qualify as stars.
  9. 6 white dwarfs, of which 1 (Sirius B) is more massive than Sun
Looking at the statement "all main sequence stars", I count a grand total of 104 main sequence stars (2A+1F+7G+15K+79M) of which 7 are Sun or brighter than Sun. Almost 7%, more than my estimate but close. I also count 27 off-main-sequence "stars" (21 brown dwarfs and 6 white), so total 131 "stars"... but with the strong suspicion of more late-T, early-Y dwarfs (who can check?). Sun or more massive than Sun is again exactly 7 of them (now excluding Achird A but including Sirius B instead), so almost 95% of stars in solar neighbourhood are less massive than Sun.
But who can check the rest of Milky Way?
 
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970

1. What is the purpose of the Early Catalog of Planet-Hosting Multiple Star (≥ 3) Systems?

The purpose of this catalog is to compile and organize data on planetary systems that have three or more stars, in order to better understand the formation and evolution of these complex systems.

2. How many planet-hosting multiple star systems are included in the catalog?

As of now, the catalog includes 68 confirmed planet-hosting multiple star systems. However, this number is constantly growing as new systems are discovered and added to the catalog.

3. How were the systems included in the catalog selected?

The systems included in the catalog were selected based on their confirmed existence of at least one planet and three or more stars. The data was collected from various sources, including ground-based telescopes and space missions such as Kepler and TESS.

4. What can we learn from studying these planet-hosting multiple star systems?

Studying these systems can provide insight into the formation and evolution of planetary systems in general. By observing the interactions between multiple stars and their planets, we can better understand the dynamics and stability of these systems.

5. Are there any patterns or trends that have been observed in these systems?

Yes, there have been several patterns and trends observed in these systems. For example, it has been found that planets in multiple star systems tend to have more eccentric orbits compared to planets in single-star systems. Additionally, the presence of multiple stars can affect the habitability of planets, as the gravitational forces from the stars can disrupt the orbits of planets and potentially make them uninhabitable.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
37
Views
14K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top