- #1
lmerriam
- 7
- 0
I'm having some trouble understanding why descriptions of the experiment (where single electrons are fired one after the other yet eventually forming an interference pattern) gloss over the issue of "how the electron gun is aimed" with respect to the barrier containing the two slits?
One, I presume, should imagine that the two-slit barrier is positioned directly in line with the electron gun: the individual electrons, therefore, being fired directly towards the barrier (more specifically, aimed perhaps to a point precisely between the two slits).
Imagined as a particle, no electrons could reach the screen to record the event -- each one would strike the barrier in the same spot between the slits, never passing through either one. Like bullets fired at a metal plate -- with two narrow slits a foot apart -- so long as the gun remains aimed directly between them, no bullets will ever get through.
If our electron gun, instead of being aimed towards the barrier, is aimed in the opposite direction .. obviously, no electrons will be recorded. But what if the electron gun was aimed sideways (i.e. 90-degrees to the apparatus)? What about 45-degrees, 25-degrees, and so on? At what point, will some electrons reach the screen to be recorded, and in what numbers (presumably having to do with the wavelength of the electron)?
I have no problem understanding that the spread out pattern of the electron strikes on the recording screen -- despite the gun being aimed directly between the slits -- is due to their wave nature. My confusion, however, is two-fold: (i) How, if at all, will this pattern vary when the gun is aimed obliquely to the apparatus (as noted above) and why?; and (ii) What factor(s) determine the overall size of the recorded points on the recording screen (i.e. the maximum height and width of the final 'image' on the screen)?
TIA!
One, I presume, should imagine that the two-slit barrier is positioned directly in line with the electron gun: the individual electrons, therefore, being fired directly towards the barrier (more specifically, aimed perhaps to a point precisely between the two slits).
Imagined as a particle, no electrons could reach the screen to record the event -- each one would strike the barrier in the same spot between the slits, never passing through either one. Like bullets fired at a metal plate -- with two narrow slits a foot apart -- so long as the gun remains aimed directly between them, no bullets will ever get through.
If our electron gun, instead of being aimed towards the barrier, is aimed in the opposite direction .. obviously, no electrons will be recorded. But what if the electron gun was aimed sideways (i.e. 90-degrees to the apparatus)? What about 45-degrees, 25-degrees, and so on? At what point, will some electrons reach the screen to be recorded, and in what numbers (presumably having to do with the wavelength of the electron)?
I have no problem understanding that the spread out pattern of the electron strikes on the recording screen -- despite the gun being aimed directly between the slits -- is due to their wave nature. My confusion, however, is two-fold: (i) How, if at all, will this pattern vary when the gun is aimed obliquely to the apparatus (as noted above) and why?; and (ii) What factor(s) determine the overall size of the recorded points on the recording screen (i.e. the maximum height and width of the final 'image' on the screen)?
TIA!