Does this violate the Law of conservation of energy?

In summary, the current generated from the tap water would be completely used up when pumping water back into the tank. Due to inefficiencies, more energy would actually be required to pump the water back into the tank. However, this concept can be useful in situations where energy can be recovered during peak usage periods, making it a practical compromise.
  • #1
DLindahl
1
0
If I were to pump water from my well (at my house) into the pressure tank that we have, it would require a certain amount of work. If I then turned on my faucet and had a small turbine generating an electric current, would that electric current (which I realize would be small, this is more for myself to understand the concept) just be required then when the pressure tank is re-pressurized...does that make sense?

Basically, if I generate a current from the tap, does that current then get negated by an extra amount needed to re-pressurize the tank?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1. Re-Read what you write before you post, that makes no sense.
2. What is violating the law?

The fact that everything in your question relates to mechanical activities I can say without understanding your description-- nothing violates the Law of Conservation of Energy (to answer your "subject" question).
 
  • #3
I think you are asking if the current generated by the tap water is completely used up when pumping water back into the tank. If so, then yes, that current would be completely used up, and due to inefficiencies you would actually require more energy than you created to pump water back into the tank.
 
  • #4
A practical example relating to your question is pumping water into a reservoir during periods of low electrical usage and then releasing the water later during a period of high electrical usage.

It takes more energy to pump the water up than is later produced when it is released, but because energy is recovered during peak usage it is a practical compromise. So it it NOT getting 'something for nothing', but the timing of the pumping and subsequent recovery can make it useful.
 
  • #5


I can say that this scenario does not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy. This law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another. In this case, the energy used to pump the water from the well into the pressure tank is transformed into potential energy stored in the pressurized water. When the faucet is turned on and the turbine generates electricity, the potential energy of the pressurized water is being transformed into electrical energy. This energy can then be used to power devices in your home.

However, it is important to note that there will be losses in this energy transformation process. Some of the energy will be lost as heat due to friction and inefficiencies in the system. Therefore, the amount of electricity generated from the turbine may not be equal to the amount of energy used to pump the water into the tank. In this case, the extra energy needed to re-pressurize the tank would come from the energy stored in the pressurized water, and not from the electricity generated by the turbine. This does not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy, as the total amount of energy in the system remains the same.
 

Related to Does this violate the Law of conservation of energy?

1. Does the Law of Conservation of Energy apply to all forms of energy?

Yes, the Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or transformed. This applies to all forms of energy, including kinetic, potential, thermal, chemical, and nuclear energy.

2. Can energy be created or destroyed in any situation?

No, according to the Law of Conservation of Energy, energy cannot be created or destroyed. It can only be transferred or transformed from one form to another.

3. Why is the Law of Conservation of Energy important in science?

The Law of Conservation of Energy is important in science because it is a fundamental principle that helps us understand and predict the behavior of energy in various systems. It also allows us to design and optimize systems to be more efficient and minimize energy loss.

4. Can energy change from one form to another without any loss?

No, energy is always subject to some loss when it is transferred or transformed from one form to another due to factors such as friction, resistance, and inefficiencies in the system. This is known as energy dissipation.

5. Is it possible for a system to violate the Law of Conservation of Energy?

No, the Law of Conservation of Energy is a fundamental law of nature and has been proven to hold true in all observed cases. If a system appears to violate this law, it is likely due to a lack of understanding or measurement error.

Similar threads

  • Mechanics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
822
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
123
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
898
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
1
Views
82
Back
Top