Do nonlocal QM interpretations violate relativity?

In summary, nonlocal quantum mechanics interpretations suggest that particles can influence each other instantly, contradicting the principle of relativity. There is ongoing debate about reconciling these concepts, with some proposing hidden variables or pilot waves. Evidence for nonlocality includes experiments such as the Bell test and delayed-choice quantum eraser. If nonlocal interpretations are correct, it would have significant implications for our understanding of the universe. Alternative explanations for nonlocality include connections through higher dimensions or hidden variables, but these are still highly debated.
  • #1
Nickyv2423
46
3
Do interpretations of QM that are non local (Bohmian, collapse, transactional) violate relativity since they allow for faster than light travel?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nickyv2423 said:
Do interpretations of QM that are non local (Bohmian, collapse, transactional) violate relativity since they allow for faster than light travel?

They don't allow for faster than light travel, so your premise is false.

Thread closed.
 

Related to Do nonlocal QM interpretations violate relativity?

1. How does nonlocal quantum mechanics (QM) interpretation violate relativity?

Nonlocal QM interpretations suggest that particles can influence each other instantly, regardless of the distance between them. This goes against the principle of relativity, which states that no information can travel faster than the speed of light.

2. Can nonlocal QM interpretations be reconciled with relativity?

There is ongoing debate and research on this topic. Some physicists believe that nonlocal QM interpretations can be reconciled with relativity by incorporating concepts such as hidden variables or pilot waves. Others argue that these interpretations fundamentally contradict relativity and cannot be reconciled.

3. What evidence is there for nonlocality in quantum mechanics?

Experiments such as the Bell test and delayed-choice quantum eraser have demonstrated nonlocality in quantum systems. These experiments show that the behavior of entangled particles is correlated, regardless of the distance between them, which suggests a nonlocal connection.

4. Are there any implications of nonlocal QM interpretations violating relativity?

If nonlocal QM interpretations are correct, it would have significant implications for our understanding of the universe and the laws of physics. It would require a major overhaul of our current understanding of relativity and could potentially lead to the development of a new theory that reconciles these seemingly contradictory principles.

5. What are some alternative explanations for nonlocality in quantum mechanics?

Aside from nonlocal QM interpretations, there are other explanations for nonlocality in quantum systems. Some theories propose that entangled particles are actually connected through a higher dimension, while others suggest that there may be hidden variables that determine the behavior of entangled particles. However, these alternative explanations are still highly debated and have not been fully accepted by the scientific community.

Similar threads

  • Poll
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
10
Views
312
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
4
Replies
123
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
4
Replies
138
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
15
Replies
491
Views
27K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
5
Replies
147
Views
7K
Back
Top