Light Pulse Peak Speed >C: Exploring LQG & Other Theories

In summary, the conversation is discussing the concept of superluminal speed, specifically in relation to the peak of a light pulse and the transmission of information. The conversation touches on various theories and experiments, ultimately concluding that although the peak of a light pulse may travel faster than the speed of light, it does not violate the principle of causality and cannot be used to transmit information faster than the speed of light.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
im not sure if this is some sort of scientific double talk,
but to circumvent problems with speed >C, it is now more
popular to say that "information" cannot travel >C, it seems
experimentaly part of the spectrum, "frequency" of light can
travel >C but any encoded information traveles <C or =C, so
irispective of "information", light can travel >C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=12797

That means that, even though the peak of the light pulse was superluminal, the speed of its information delivery definitely wasn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the above is just one of many sites that seem to say the same.

so how does this fit in with LQG and other theories?
why can only the peak of the light pulse travel >C ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Originally posted by wolram
im not sure if this is some sort of scientific double talk,
but to circumvent problems with speed >C, it is now more
popular to say that "information" cannot travel >C, ...

..why can only the peak of the light pulse travel >C ?

It has always been superluminal "information" transfer that would not be allowed by the combination of special relativistic physics and the principle of causality. Consider a superluminal pulse sent from an emitter to a receiver. "If" the pulse width could be considered negligable then the emition and reception constitute two spacelike separated events having each occurred at a specific location and time. Due to relative simultaneity a simple velocity boost for a frame transformation can be done in order to reverse order the spacelike separated events. Then according to the new frame, the effect of reception would preceed the cause of emmition. This is a violation of the principle of causality according to which effects never preceed their causes. Where the controversy comes in is that there are anomalous disspersive media for which the group velocity of light is greater than the Lorentz speed c. Experiments have been done sending laser pulses through such media with group speeds over 300c. Now for the catch. In the above scenario the pulse width had to be considered negligable. In reality quantum mechanics puts limits on a pulse width or period really for a given laser frequency in accordance with an energy time uncertainty principle. In order for the pulse to travel faster than c the laser has to be within a very narrow frequency range given by the properties of the media. In order for the pulse not to be lost to disspersion in the transmition it has to be gain assisted even over a short distance of transmition. The end result is that in the actual experiment the pulse width is even wider than the distance of transmition. They may be able to change that at some point, but there will always be a limit on how narrow the period of the pulse is. Now the group velocity is the speed at which the pulse peak travels, but once a given small segment of the pulse arrives at the receiver the information has still not been completely read. The information is not completely received until after the complete period of pulse reception after the front of the pulse arrived. One could then say that the information speed is not the group speed when this period can't be negleted but is instead given by distance of transmition divided by the sum of the group's peak transmition time and the period of the pulse itself. This information speed turns out to be [tex]5.0x10^{-5}c[/tex] for the 310c group speed experiment. Thats not so impressive. One could hypothetically assymtotically increase the information speed to the group speed in such an experiment by far expanding the distance of transmittion. The problem is that the information will ultimately be lost to the disspersion as the information speed approaches c.
 
  • #3
Maybe this thought experiment can explain the difference between something like a peak traveling superluminally and information traveling superluminally:


I have a large number of LCDs which I have arranged at rest (in some reference frame of my choosing) into a line a light-year long. Attached to each LCD is a power source, a microprocessor, and an atomic clock. The microprocessors for adjacent LCDs are also connected to each other. All of the atomic clocks are synchronized in the same rest frame.


Scenario 1: Information traveling FTL:

Each microprocessor is programmed to, when it receives a signal from its left, flash its light on and off then send a signal to its right.

I send a signal to the leftmost microprocessor. Half a year later, the rightmost processor flashes its light.


Scenario 2: A "peak" traveling FTL:

Someone comes along and programs into each microprocessor a time at which it will blink its light, and the times are chosen in such a way that the light that is on will travel down the line, and there will be half a year between the leftmost light blinking and the rightmost light blinking.


The former is what is forbidden by relativity. Something like the latter is what's happening in FTL experiments.


In laymen's terms, scenario 1 is forbidden because the information about the starting event propagates faster than light, but scenario 2 is allowed because all the relevant information was distributed in a slower than light fashion (even though the visible result is identical to scenario 1)
 
  • #4
i am sorry, but this is hard to fully understand, if something
the "light peak", can be judged to have traveled superluminally
and detected ,then the experiment has already provided information
that exceeds the speed of light.
 
  • #5
No because the last device didn't receive a signal from the first, it received instructions from its own local setting. The light peak was no more an information carrier thn is the spot of light you produce on a fence by swinging a flashlight.
 
  • #6
this is all very confusing, thanks for trying to explain, im
none the wiser though, i can't see the point in publishing a
paper that claimes superluminal speed ,when in reality nothing has exceeded C, ok the wave peak has ,can travel 300 times C but
as nothing useful can be done with it, its not breaking any
"limits"?
 
  • #7
In order for the pulse to travel faster than c the laser has to be within a very narrow frequency range given by the properties of the media.

Forgive me but how does this be true? By energy-time uncertainty pcp, delta E*delta t >= hbar/2

E = hf,

delta f*delta t >= (1/h)*(hbar/2)

...

Did I overlook anything?
 

What is Light Pulse Peak Speed >C?

Light Pulse Peak Speed >C is a concept in physics that suggests the possibility of particles traveling at speeds faster than the speed of light, which is considered to be the maximum speed limit in our universe. This idea is still a topic of debate and is being explored through various theories.

What is LQG?

LQG stands for Loop Quantum Gravity, which is a theory that attempts to reconcile the theories of general relativity and quantum mechanics. It proposes that space and time are made up of discrete units rather than being continuous, and that gravity is a result of the curvature of these units.

What other theories are being explored in relation to Light Pulse Peak Speed >C?

Aside from LQG, other theories being explored include string theory, which suggests that the fundamental building blocks of the universe are tiny vibrating strings, and the Alcubierre drive, which proposes the manipulation of space-time to achieve faster-than-light travel.

Is Light Pulse Peak Speed >C possible?

As of now, there is no conclusive evidence to prove that Light Pulse Peak Speed >C is possible. While some theories suggest the possibility, it is still a topic of debate and further research is needed to fully understand and potentially prove its feasibility.

What are the implications of Light Pulse Peak Speed >C?

If Light Pulse Peak Speed >C is proven to be possible, it would have significant implications in the field of physics and potentially even change our understanding of the universe. It could also have practical applications, such as enabling faster space travel and communication.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
291
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
146
Views
7K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
56
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
944
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
9
Views
158
Back
Top