Sports Fanaticism: Why Do People Get So Involved?

  • Thread starter Turtle
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sports
In summary: In doing so, they connect us to a realm of human experience far beyond the mundane, and in doing that, they restore to us our sense of wonder, mystery, and awe. In summary, the attachment to sports and the drive to win can be attributed to our innate desire to compete and do battle, as well as the historical roots of sports as a survival mechanism. Additionally, the sense of belonging to a larger social group and the competition between rival teams can lead to violent and aggressive behavior towards others. Ultimately, sports tap into our natural spiritual and aesthetic sensibilities, providing us with a sense of wonder and connection to something greater than ourselves.
  • #1
Turtle
52
0
Why do people get so attached to sports, that they must win, and killing and beating other fans as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The drive in every psyche to compete would be my opinion. We all, at some level, want to compete and do battle. Sports seem to be an extension of that. Plus there's the "Be all I can be" kinda of persona of sports.
 
  • #3
Probably because what we see today as sports derive from the ancient and brutal hunts and war-games, where winning at all costs was a requirement of survival.
 
  • #4
Originally posted by FZ+
Probably because what we see today as sports derive from the ancient and brutal hunts and war-games, where winning at all costs was a requirement of survival.

Exactly, it's your basic "Fight or Flight" reaction. The people that are attracted to sports are those that have a predisposition to "fight".
 
  • #5
Originally posted by Turtle
Why do people get so attached to sports, that they must win, and killing and beating other fans as well?
Are you talking about the recent altercation outside Dodger stadium? The latest I heard on the news was that they weren't arguing about the game - that it was something else. Was that later disproved?
Even if they weren't arguing about the game, there is almost always pretty serious drinking (usually beer - at least that was all they sold whenever I was at a game there) going on, and alcohol tends to make people more violent and aggressive.
 
  • #6
I think the answer to this question is more complex than has been indicated thus far. I think FZ+ was on the right track, but I would like to extend his basic idea a little further by borrowing some ideas from The Lucifer Principle (a very interesting book by Howard Bloom that I'm in the process of reading).

A sports team is a kind of social/cultural phenomenon in itself, and it is human nature to seek to belong to such social groups-- numerous studies have shown that one's psychological and physiological health are directly correlated with one's subjective sense of playing a meaningful and valued role in a larger social context. According to Bloom, such large social groups take on a life of their own and become a sort of superorganism with its own emergent character and motives, including an evolutionary struggle for survival against rival superorganisms (a clear example of such a superorganism would be the classical 'mob mentality,' wherein the collective mob somehow emerges as a sort of single unified creature in its own right).

The average fan's identification with this larger whole is often plainly evident in the language s/he uses-- a fan will say of his/her preferred team, "We really need to make a trade" or "There's no way they can beat us." The superogranism's competition with rival superorganisms is thus experienced on the individual level as the 'us vs. them' mentality-- in sports, this effect is in fact invited and amplified by associated cultural/geographical identities, such as New York vs. New Jersey or Brazil vs. Italy. In general, the more distinct 'us' and 'them' are, the more these superorganisms stand in direct competition with each other, and thus the more acerbic, vicious, and inhumane their attitudes may become towards each other. Any historical review will show that the violence and competition that takes place within a social group is negligible compared to that which occurs between rival social groups, which Bloom explains in terms of evolutionary survival principles applied to the superorganism itself. (By way of analogy, an individual's immune system must be ruthless against outside threats distinct from the unitary body/organism in order to keep the individual alive, but if it begins to turn its destructive powers on the body itself, the individual is doomed to a short life.)

Fans of a team may have their own internal conflicts, but they generally get along due to their unifying interest-- they are all for the team, after all, and internal bickering only dilutes solidarity. On the other hand, they are much more apt to view fans of a fierce rival team with distaste, disdain, mockery, etc., especially if these rival fans have the audacity to show their rival colors on the team's home turf. If the competition is fierce enough, the distinctions sharp enough, and the animosities high enough, these relatively mundane behaviors can ignite into violence. Similarly, the home team's best players may take on a nearly mythological status to their fans while the rival team's best players may become reviled, villainous figures berated with merciless boos and insults.

In this way, the us vs. them mentality creates a sort of meta-evolutionary conflict which makes acceptable-- and even promotes-- attitudes and actions against fellow human beings that in 'normal' human activity would be considered anywhere from inappropriate to inhuman. (Note that sporting rivalries are just one example of this general principle of human nature.)

As for what enthralls people in sports so strongly in the first place, the sporting/athletic experience actually is deeply rooted in our natural spiritual and aesthetic sensibilities, believe it or not. Rather than expound on this further myself, I will defer to an absolutely fantastic article that states the case much better than I could:

http://www.esalen.org/air/essays/spiritinsport.shtml [Broken]

Some selected quotes:

The religious nature of sport is the subject of Michael Novak’s The Joy of Sports. Novak argues, eloquently and persuasively, that in American society sport is a kind of "natural religion." "I am saying," he writes, "that sports flow outward into action from a deep natural impulse that is radically religious: an impulse of freedom, respect for ritual limits, a zest for symbolic meaning, and a longing for perfection. I don't mean that participation in sports, as athlete or fan, makes one a believer in 'God,' under whatever concept, image, or experience one attaches the name. Rather, sports drive one in some dark and generic sense 'godward.'"

Sports satisfy our deep hunger to connect with a realm of mythic meaning, to see the transpersonal forces that work within and upon human nature enacted in dramatic form, and to experience the social cohesion that these forms make possible. Whether or not we so name them, these are religious functions. But our society so thoroughly secularizes sport that we can barely recognize, let alone express, what it makes us feel. Sport is, in Novak's words, "a faith without explanation."

Sports may no longer be about transcendence, but they still enact transcendence. They retain their power to intensify experience and awaken within us a larger sense of being. They continue to provide forms that make present to us the primordial forces that in other times were called gods, that today might be called archetypes, and which still constitute the primary themes and motifs of art, philosophy, and psychology. This is the hidden dimension of sport, its secret life.

In Second Wind Bill Russell [a Hall of Fame basketball player] mentions many of the qualities athletes may experience in the zone: profound joy, acute intuition (which at times feels like precognition), a feeling of effortlessness in the midst of intense exertion, a sense of the action taking place in slow motion, feelings of awe and perfection, increased mastery, and self-transcendence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What causes people to become such passionate sports fans?

There are a variety of factors that can contribute to someone becoming a sports fanatic. Some people may have grown up in a family where sports were highly valued and passed down their love for a particular team or sport. Others may be drawn to the excitement and competitiveness of sports, or find a sense of community and camaraderie with other fans. Additionally, some research suggests that genetics and personality traits may play a role in a person's level of sports fandom.

2. Is sports fanaticism just a form of escapism?

While some people may use sports as a way to escape from their daily lives, it's important to note that being a sports fan involves much more than simply watching games. Many fans are actively engaged in following their team's news and statistics, attending games, and participating in discussions and debates with other fans. For many, sports are not just a distraction, but a meaningful and integral part of their lives.

3. Are there any negative consequences of being a sports fanatic?

Like any form of intense interest or passion, there can be potential negative consequences of being a sports fanatic. Some people may become overly invested in their team's success or failure, leading to stress, anxiety, and disappointment. Additionally, extreme fandom can sometimes lead to conflicts with friends, family, and even strangers who support rival teams. It's important for individuals to maintain a healthy balance and perspective when it comes to their sports fanaticism.

4. Can sports fanaticism be harmful to a person's mental health?

While being a sports fan may bring about temporary emotional highs and lows, there is no evidence to suggest that it can be harmful to a person's mental health. In fact, research has shown that being a sports fan can have positive effects on an individual's mental well-being, such as providing a sense of belonging, promoting social connections, and increasing overall life satisfaction. However, like any activity, moderation and balance are key to maintaining a healthy relationship with sports.

5. Is there a difference between being a sports fan and being a sports fanatic?

The terms "fan" and "fanatic" are often used interchangeably, but there is a distinction between the two. A fan is someone who enjoys and supports a particular team or sport, while a fanatic is someone who has an intense, almost obsessive, passion for their team or sport. While there is no clear line between the two, it's important to recognize when one's interest in sports may be becoming too extreme and potentially harmful to their well-being or relationships.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
858
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
610
Replies
8
Views
575
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
784
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
728
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
635
Replies
26
Views
4K
Back
Top