Dervative of volume of sphere?

So, the sphere is the boundary of the ball, the circle is the boundary of the disk, the curve is the boundary of the ribbon, the point is the boundary of the line.In summary, when taking the derivative of the volume of a sphere, you do not get the formula for the area of a circle because a sphere and a ball are technically different objects. The derivative of the volume with respect to the radius gives the surface area of the ball, which is 4πr^2. This is because a ball is made up of shells of spheres, while a circle is made up of shells of circles. The equation 4/3πr^3 represents the volume of a ball, while 4πr^2
  • #1
Psyguy22
62
0
If you take the derivative of the area of a circle, you get the formula for circumference. When you take the derivative of the volume of the sphere, you do not get the formula for the area of a circle. Why not?
d/dr (4/3pi r^3) =4pi r^2
d/dr (pi r^2)= 2pi r
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What you actually get when you take the derivative of the volume with respect to radius is the surface area of the ball. Note that there is a technical difference between a ball and a "sphere": a sphere is, strictly speaker, the surface of a ball. It does not include the volume it encloses, whereas a "ball" includes the surface and the volume contained within. Occasionally the forum gets questions about the "volume of a sphere" and someone will answer that it is zero, which is technically correct because the volume of a "sphere", interpreted literally, refers to the volume the surface itself, which is zero, and not the volume contained by the surface; the OP in these cases pretty much always means the volume of the ball and was just unaware of the precise distinction in the terminology. So, just pointing that out.

Anyways, a way to see why it works like this is to consider the following: to build a circle of area ##\pi R^2##, you can think of the process of building "shells" of circles of increasing radius, where each shell has an infinitesimal thickness ##dr##. By adding more and more shells you are increasing the area of the circle you are building. If you have a circle of radius r, the infinitesimal change in area you get when adding another shell is ##dA = 2\pi r dr## - the circumference of the shell times the thickness.

When you then go and start building a ball in a similar manner, you are not adding shells of circles. Rather, you are adding shells of spheres of thickness ##dr## and surface area ##4\pi r^2##. So, the infinitesimal change in volume as you add a shell to a ball of radius r is ##dV = 4\pi r^2 dr## - the surface area times the thickness.

Does that make sense?
 
  • #3
area of circle:circumference::volume of sphere:surface area of sphere
pi r^2:2pi r::4pi r^3/2:4pi r^2
A:A'::V=V'

you get surface area of the sphere

This follows from Stokes theorem

[tex]\int_\Omega \mathrm {d}\omega = \int_ {\partial \Omega} \omega[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #4
So my old geometry book lied? Isn't a sphere a 3-D shape? Meaning it would have volume? What exactly does the equation 4/3pi r^3 represent then?
 
  • #5
Psyguy22 said:
So my old geometry book lied? Isn't a sphere a 3-D shape? Meaning it would have volume?

Sort of. In natural English sphere is a 3D object. In mathematics it's a 2D object. From Wikipedia:
In mathematics, a careful distinction is made between the sphere (a two-dimensional surface embedded in three-dimensional Euclidean space) and the ball (the interior of the three-dimensional sphere).
Your geometry textbook wasn't being careful.

What exactly does the equation 4/3pi r^3 represent then?
Mute already told you: the term is ball.
 
  • #6
Ok. Thank you. And sorry for the misuse of words. So just to make sure I understand
4/3 pi r^3 is the volume of a 'ball' and 4 pi r^2 is the surface area of a 'sphere'?
 
  • #7
Psyguy22 said:
Ok. Thank you. And sorry for the misuse of words. So just to make sure I understand
4/3 pi r^3 is the volume of a 'ball' and 4 pi r^2 is the surface area of a 'sphere'?
It is, of course, the surface area of the ball itself, the sphere being its SURROUNDING BOUNDARY.
(Just as the circumference of the DISK constitutes the surrounding circle bounding the disk)

For nice geometrical objects, the surrounding boundary of the object is of 1 dimension lower than the object itself.
 

Related to Dervative of volume of sphere?

1. What is the formula for finding the derivative of the volume of a sphere?

The formula for finding the derivative of the volume of a sphere is dv/dt = 4πr²dr/dt, where r is the radius of the sphere and t is the variable with respect to which we are differentiating.

2. Why is the derivative of the volume of a sphere important?

The derivative of the volume of a sphere is important because it helps us understand how the volume changes as the radius of the sphere changes. This can be useful in many real-world applications, such as in engineering or physics.

3. Can the derivative of the volume of a sphere be negative?

Yes, the derivative of the volume of a sphere can be negative. This would indicate that the volume is decreasing as the radius increases, or vice versa. This can happen, for example, when the sphere is being deflated or inflated.

4. Is finding the derivative of the volume of a sphere difficult?

The process of finding the derivative of the volume of a sphere can be challenging for those who are new to calculus. However, with practice and a solid understanding of the underlying principles, it can become easier.

5. What other shapes can the derivative of volume be applied to?

The derivative of volume can be applied to any shape or object with a measurable volume, such as cylinders, cones, and pyramids. It can also be applied to more complex shapes by breaking them down into smaller, simpler shapes and using the appropriate formulas.

Similar threads

  • Calculus
Replies
16
Views
506
Replies
4
Views
391
Replies
2
Views
315
  • Calculus
Replies
29
Views
756
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
838
  • Calculus
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top