Deriving x(t) from work-energy theorem

In summary, K&K's text on mechanics presents the derivation of the work energy theorem, which states that the change in kinetic energy of an object is equal to the work done on the object. The text mentions that by using the equation v=\frac{dx}{dt}, we can solve for \frac{dx}{dt} and integrate again to find x(t). However, when trying this with v_0=0, the resulting equation is incorrect. To solve for x(t) when v_0 is not zero, an integral of force must be used instead of force itself under the radical. An example given is when F = -kx, representing a mass attached to a spring.
  • #1
autodidude
333
0
In K&K's text on mechanics, after they present the derivation of the work energy theorem:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2-\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2=\int_x_0^x F(x) dx[/tex]

It is mentioned that since [tex]v=\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex], we could solve for [tex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex] and integrate again to find x(t)

I tried that with [tex]v_0=0[/tex] just to make things a little easier and ended up with something like:

[tex]x=\int \sqrt{2m(F(x)-F(x_0))}dt[/tex]

which looks horrible and wrong

Is this heading down the wrong path? How would you do it when [tex]v_0[/tex] is not zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your derivation is not right; it must be an integral of force rather than force itself under the radical.

As an example, consider the case when F = -kx (mass attached to a spring).
 
  • #3
As voko says, plus, you have m where it should be 1/m.
 

Related to Deriving x(t) from work-energy theorem

1. How does the work-energy theorem relate to deriving x(t)?

The work-energy theorem states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its kinetic energy. This can be used to derive the position function, x(t), by integrating the acceleration function, a(t), twice.

2. What are the assumptions made when using the work-energy theorem to derive x(t)?

The work-energy theorem assumes that the only forces acting on the object are conservative forces, and that the object is initially at rest.

3. Can the work-energy theorem be used for non-conservative forces?

No, the work-energy theorem only applies to conservative forces. For non-conservative forces, the principle of virtual work must be used to derive the position function.

4. How does the work-energy theorem differ from the principle of virtual work?

The work-energy theorem relates the work done on an object to its change in kinetic energy, while the principle of virtual work relates the work done by a force to the displacement of a virtual displacement.

5. Are there any limitations to using the work-energy theorem to derive x(t)?

Yes, the work-energy theorem can only be used for one-dimensional motion and when the acceleration is constant or can be expressed as a function of time. It also assumes that the object is initially at rest.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
516
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
225
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
202
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
860
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
621
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top