Why Is Bloch's Theorem Derived Using Complex Methods?

In summary, the solutions satisfying ##\psi(x+l)=\lambda\,\psi(x)## (4.191) are the only physically admissible solutions because the probability of finding an electron at any indistinguishable position must be the same, implying ##\psi(x+l)=\lambda\,\psi(x)## and ##|\lambda|^2=1##. This phase factor is obtained from symmetry considerations, where every cell in the periodic potential is indistinguishable and the expectation values of all dynamical variables must be identical. The use of (4.191) and (4.196) ensures that this is true, making them the necessary conditions for physically admissible solutions.
  • #1
Happiness
679
30
Why are the solutions satisfying ##\psi(x+l)=\lambda\,\psi(x)## (4.191) the only physically admissible solutions? (##l## is the period of the periodic potential.)

We may argue that the probability of finding an electron at ##x##, ##|\psi(x)|^2##, must be the same at any indistinguishable position:

##|\psi(x+l)|^2=|\psi(x)|^2##

This implies

##\psi(x+l)=\lambda\,\psi(x)##
##|\lambda|^2=1##
##\lambda=e^{iKl}##, which is the same as (4.196)

It seems that we can get (4.196) in a shorter way this way as compared to how it is done below by using the characteristic equation of matrix ##a## and the Wronskian determinant.

So it seems that the book justifies (4.191) in a different way from the argument using probability.

EDIT: I realize the probability argument does not justify the use of (4.191) either. Rather, it is justified by symmetry: Since the potential is periodic, the expectation values of all dynamical variables must be identical in every period. The only way this can happen is when (4.191) and (4.196) are true.

Still, it's unclear why the book uses such a long way to derive (4.196), without justifying the use of (4.191).

Screen Shot 2015-12-20 at 2.47.38 am.png

Screen Shot 2015-12-20 at 2.48.03 am.png

Screen Shot 2015-12-20 at 2.48.17 am.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Happiness said:
Still, it's unclear why the book uses such a long way to derive (4.196), without justifying the use of (4.191).

View attachment 93523
It has been always my question that what is the reason for using such a long way to drive Bloch Theorem. However I thought this long way is to obtain the phase factor ##e^{iKl}##. Could you please specify exactly how it can be obtained from symmetry considerations?
 
  • #3
hokhani said:
It has been always my question that what is the reason for using such a long way to drive Bloch Theorem. However I thought this long way is to obtain the phase factor ##e^{iKl}##. Could you please specify exactly how it can be obtained from symmetry considerations?

Since the potential is periodic, every cell (of length ##l##) is indistinguishable from each other and the expectation values of all dynamical variables must be identical in every cell. The sufficient conditions are that (4.191) and (4.196) are true (because wave functions that differ by a constant phase factor have the same expectation values).

But I wonder if they are the necessary conditions too (ie., if two wave functions have the same expectation values of all dynamical variables, then they must differ by a constant phase factor).
 
Last edited:

Related to Why Is Bloch's Theorem Derived Using Complex Methods?

What is Bloch's theorem?

Bloch's theorem is a fundamental principle in the study of crystalline solids, which states that the wave function of an electron in a periodic potential can be written as a product of a plane wave and a function that has the same periodicity as the potential.

Who discovered Bloch's theorem?

Felix Bloch, a Swiss-American physicist, first derived the theorem in 1928 while working on his PhD thesis at the University of Leipzig.

Why is Bloch's theorem important?

Bloch's theorem is important because it provides a mathematical framework for understanding the electronic behavior of crystalline solids, which is crucial in many areas of physics and materials science.

What are the assumptions of Bloch's theorem?

The assumptions of Bloch's theorem include a periodic potential, a single electron approximation, and the absence of external forces such as magnetic fields.

What are some applications of Bloch's theorem?

Bloch's theorem is used extensively in the study of electronic band structures in solids, as well as in the development of semiconductor devices and the understanding of other materials properties such as conductivity and magnetism.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
879
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
748
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
918
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top