French Woman Arrested for Anti-Muslim Comments

[Carlos Hernandez]

No free speech in France

Twice convicted of inciting racial hatred after she criticized the ritual sacrifice of sheep by Muslims during their Eid el-Kebir holy day, Brigitte Bardot (above) is making news again this year for much the same reason. Two French human rights groups took swift legal action against the provocative French screen siren, charging that her latest book Crî dans le silence is full of racist attacks against Muslims—though, of course, Muslims are of all races.

The evidence of her latest offense: Bardot denounces the "Islamicization" of France and blames the degeneration of French society on her country’s liberal immigration laws. "For twenty years we have submitted to a dangerous and uncontrolled underground infiltration," she writes in her new book that became an instant bestseller in France this summer. "Not only does [Islam] fail to give way to our laws and customs. Quite the contrary, as time goes by it tries to impose its own law on us."

Complete text at http://www.cruxnews.com/rose/onward.html

 

[Carlos Hernandez]

No free speech in Germany either. The Human Rights document says every person has free speech, but most countries ignore this part of the Human Rights document, while hypocritically accusing OTHER nations of not following Human Rights. Just shows that most humans are biologically built to be irrational. We should alter our human brains at the genetic level:

Jail sought for neo-Nazi band

9 December 2003

BERLIN - Prosecutors have demanded long jail terms for a German neo-Nazi band, contending it was a criminal gang in the eyes of the law because the group's songs spread racial hatred and Nazi doctrines.

The trio were "terrorists with electric guitars" and "ideological arsonists", a lawyer for the state said.

Complete text at http://www.expatica.com/source/site_article.asp?subchannel_id=52&story_id=2967

 

[R0man]

The arrest of Brigitte Bardot for her comments about Islam and immigration in France raises important questions about the limits of free speech in a democratic society. While it is understandable that her words may be seen as offensive and inflammatory to some, the fact that she has been convicted twice for expressing her opinions is concerning. Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right and is essential for a healthy and open society. It allows for the expression of diverse opinions and the exchange of ideas.

However, there are also limits to free speech, especially when it incites hatred or violence towards a particular group. In this case, Bardot's remarks about Muslims and their religious practices could be seen as promoting discrimination and prejudice. It is important for individuals to be held accountable for their words and actions, especially when they have the potential to harm others.

At the same time, it is crucial to have a balanced approach to protecting free speech and preventing hate speech. The line between the two can be blurry and it is the responsibility of the legal system to carefully consider each case and ensure that the right to free speech is not unjustly restricted.

In the case of Bardot, it is important to acknowledge that her comments may have been offensive to some, but it is also important to recognize her right to express her opinions. It is only through open and respectful dialogue that we can address issues such as immigration and cultural integration. Arresting individuals for their opinions only serves to stifle this necessary conversation.

In conclusion, while there may be no absolute free speech in any society, it is crucial for democratic countries to find a balance between protecting this fundamental right and preventing hate speech. We must continue to have open and honest discussions about sensitive topics, while also fostering a culture of respect and understanding for all individuals and their beliefs.