Creating an RF Signal using analog methods

In summary, this person is looking for a way to generate a 13.56 MHz signal using an analogue circuit. They are confused by the components involved and do not know how to tune the circuit to reach that frequency. They also mention that there may be a more practical way to generate a 13.56 MHz signal using a vacuum tube.
  • #1
ChaseRLewis
43
0
How is this done. Been reading about sputtering and DC sputtering is extremely simple. However, I'm not very experienced with RF circuitry so understanding exactly how to design that circuit confuses me a bit. Been reading about RF circuits but to generate an RF signal every method I find uses DAC converters and is more suited for music then high voltage applications like this. I understand how the impedance matching unit works fairly well and they use variable vacuum capacitors to manage the high voltage.

Given that the impedance matching unit is done with a simple L matching ciruit using analog components I imagine the power supply has to do with analog components also. My google fu isn't finding much. I know radio predates the digital transistor so exactly how using analog components do you create a radio signal and tune the frequency?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Surely you've looked for old-style radio transmitter circuits online?
 
  • #3
Yeah, I understand I need to amplify it and increase the frequency of the input signal. Looking into it I'm thinking one of the things confusing me is I saw a mosfet / transistor symbol in the circuit and it seems to correspond to a vacuum tube. Which I'm just realizing is the analog equivalent to the digital transistor. So that solves a bit of it. Now just need to figure out how to tune it and see if that is enough to get to 13.56 MHZ in one step. Though I might need a toroidal transformer as well to reach the desired voltage, but I have no idea how those are tuned either. Just that they are used for RF transformers.

Is there another high power equivalent nowadays to the transistor or is the vacuum tube the only option? I still see people making vacuum capacitors but can't see anything about vacuum tubes in modern day stuff. So it has me questioning if that is what is actually used nowadays. Or if there is a more practical way then a vacuum tube to do it.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
ChaseRLewis said:
Yeah, I understand I need to amplify it and increase the frequency of the input signal. Looking into it I'm thinking one of the things confusing me is I saw a mosfet / transistor symbol in the circuit and it seems to correspond to a vacuum tube. Which I'm just realizing is the analog equivalent to the digital transistor. So that solves a bit of it. Now just need to figure out how to tune it and see if that is enough to get to 13.56 MHZ in one step. Though I might need a toroidal transformer as well to reach the desired voltage, but I have no idea how those are tuned either. Just that they are used for RF transformers.

Is there another high power equivalent nowadays to the transistor or is the vacuum tube the only option? I still see people making vacuum capacitors but can't see anything about vacuum tubes in modern day stuff. So it has me questioning if that is what is actually used nowadays. Or if there is a more practical way then a vacuum tube to do it.

I'm not sure what you mean by a "digital transistor". A transistor is, inherently, an analogue circuit element which needs to be driven appropriately to have discrete states.

I think you are trying to leap into this subject with just not enough background knowledge. You introduce the idea of a toroidal transformer, out of nowhere. (??)
There is no need to go digital for a project like this.
If you want a source of 13MHz then you can probably buy a low cost signal generator (eBay) and you could also buy an amplifier to deliver sufficient power for whatever you want to do. If you want to DIY the project then you will need to start with some basic circuit theory and construction experience at lower frequencies. Otherwise you will not be able to know what is happening with any circuit you try to build. This is not a trivial task that you can do in an afternoon. (You may be able to find a helpful Radio Ham who lives nearby - some people like a challenge and, if the application is interesting enough, a hobbyist could be persuaded to get involved.

The idea of sputtering is simple but do you have the vacuum equipment to do it with?
 
  • #5
Use a 13.56 MHZ crystal oscillator to drive an ex-amateur linear amplifier. That should give you between 500 W and 1 kW. How much power do you need?

Alternatively, there are many diathermy units available on the 2nd hand market for the higher ISM bands such as 27MHz and 40.68 MHz. Typical power output is 5 kW. They are used for induction heating of metals and for dielectric heating in the plastics industries.
 
  • #6
Google this: "QRP"
It will give you lots of hits from people who build low-power RF stuff from scratch, both discrete and integrated circuits. It sounds like you want to do very high power stuff, which is non-trivial.
 
  • #7
I think it's time to issue the PF Safety warning about dealing with high power levels and high voltages. Not so problematic when fed to an antenna but, when transformed to high voltages and used in non-standard gear, a potential for self harm.
 
  • #8
I think the question is still too vague and general for anyone to give good assistance.

@ChaseRLewis:
We have to assume some particular project, like you want to build a commercial-level AM radio transmitter maybe?

DSE used to have a kitset FM radio microphone too - had a range of a few meters off a 1.5V battery.

At the other end of the scale, ships at sea used to use spark-gap transmitters that could (reportedly) fry seaguls at close range. The Morse keys used to have big insulating skirts so the operator wouldn't accidentally touch the contacts.

I was initially wondering if you just wanted to know the principles of analog RF generation - but you do seem to have a particular project in mind. What is it?

If we know the purpose of the RF, we can direct you better to what sort of information you need to know.
 
  • #9
ChaseRLewis

hi there,
It appears as tho you have a bad misunderstanding of what digital and analog is

Pretty much any transmitter from oscillator to final amplifier is an analog circuit
what makes it a digital or analog transmitter is the modulation type applied to it

just for an example ... here's a basic 3 transistor ANALOG FM transmitter

attachment.php?attachmentid=66068&stc=1&d=1390874186.jpg


here's a basic single transistor Colpitts Oscillator running at ~ 12MHz Also ANALOG

attachment.php?attachmentid=66080&stc=1&d=1390894651.gif



Dave

EDIT ... got home and discovered the Colpitts osc diag wasnt there
 

Attachments

  • Basic FM TX.jpg
    Basic FM TX.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 1,156
  • Colpitts Osc.GIF
    Colpitts Osc.GIF
    2.4 KB · Views: 875
Last edited:
  • #10
For that matter you can buy RF transmitters in a chip - such devices usually have digital IO these days it seems.
I have a feeling that is what OP wants to avoid.

The 3 transistor circuit above would fit the bill - analog mic input and crank-cap tuning, the only arguably digital component is the switch - and so would many others circuits easily googleable so I still wonder what OP actually wants. You know - to narrow it down a bit?
 
  • #11
ChaseRLewis said:
How is this done. Been reading about sputtering and DC sputtering is extremely simple. However, I'm not very experienced with RF circuitry so understanding exactly how to design that circuit confuses me a bit...
Are you just interested in RF transmitter design, or do you actually need to make an RF sputterer?
Some idea of the magnitude of the application would be useful.
Is it for one-off or production line use?
 
  • #12
davenn said:
ChaseRLewis

hi there,
It appears as tho you have a bad misunderstanding of what digital and analog is

As does Mr Dyson, with the "Digital Motor" in his cordless vacuum cleaner. Shockin'!
 
  • #13
sophiecentaur said:
As does Mr Dyson, with the "Digital Motor" in his cordless vacuum cleaner. Shockin'!


hahaha We have Dyson vac's in Oz but I hadn't noticed the "Digital Motor" comment in the telecommercials, mind you I skip those ads pretty quickly. maybe I should have a listen and a laugh


cheers
Dave
 
  • #14
Quite ridiculous that you should be in the Antipodes. I thought I was conversing with someone just down the road. haha. Space and time travel.

(Doesn't mean you're a bad person)
 
  • #15
All things are relative. For example, I think it quite ridiculous that sophiecentaur thought davenn was in England.

I believe davenn, sophicentaur and baluncore are all geospatially located south of the Watford Gap. United we stand.

sophiecentaur said:
(Doesn't mean you're a bad person)
Certainly not at cricket.

It is only the forces of prejudice that prevent the web of optic fibre from causing the immediate collapse of our digital universe to singularity.

No matter how strongly the web of optic fibre pulls us together, will prejudice always keep us apart?
 
  • #16
Baluncore said:
All things are relative. For example, I think it quite ridiculous that sophiecentaur thought davenn was in England.

I believe davenn, sophicentaur and baluncore are all geospatially located south of the Watford Gap. United we stand.


Certainly not at cricket.

It is only the forces of prejudice that prevent the web of optic fibre from causing the immediate collapse of our digital universe to singularity.

No matter how strongly the web of optic fibre pulls us together, will prejudice always keep us apart?

Do you think that, if I gave a good tug on my ethernet cable, all the PF members' computers would move a bit nearer the wall sockets?

(I didn't like his comment about the cricket. But our girls are doing not too badly so yah boo. I never watch it aamof. Six nations is soon.)
 
  • #17
sophiecentaur said:
Do you think that, if I gave a good tug on my ethernet cable, all the PF members' computers would move a bit nearer the wall sockets?
No. But knowing your interest in experimental physics and your appreciation of the PF, I believe you are ideally situated to carry out your proposed experiment. I am also convinced that it will be successful in better uniting the PF membership.
 
  • #18
. . . . . . . .Did you notice anything happen just then? My screen's gone blank. haha
 
  • #19
sophiecentaur said:
As does Mr Dyson, with the "Digital Motor" in his cordless vacuum cleaner. Shockin'!

Of course it's a digital motor. At any instant in time, it's either "on" or "off" :biggrin:
 
  • #20
It's off topic, but why can't a digitally controlled motor and driver module utilizing high frequency class D bridged drivers and processor control be termed a "digital motor". It's all ON-OFF with no "analog" drive. It certainly isn't classic analog.

I don't know exactly how the dysan motor actually works, but it certainly looked cool on Charlie Rose the other day.

Just asking.
 
  • #21
Everything in digital electronics is, at it's fundamental level, implemented with analogue components.
Advertising will call anything digital if it increases market penetration.
It is important not to confuse the motor with the programming of the motor controller.

The “Dyson Digital Motor” is a reluctance motor, driven at 100 kRPM by a digital controller.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reluctance_motor
 
  • #22
Hmmmm. I have a digital hammer. It's hitting things or not, depending upon a binary decision of my brain. It's also 'green' and 'designer'. Those three words persuaded me to go out and buy it to replace my boring old hammer. :devil:
 
  • #23
I have many different analogues to your digital hammer.
The only way my hammers are digital is in their attraction to my digits.
Maybe hammer heads are naturally attracted to nails.
 
  • #24
Baluncore said:
I have many different analogues to your digital hammer.
The only way my hammers are digital is in their attraction to my digits.
Maybe hammer heads are naturally attracted to nails.

haha ouch

tis time you visited a hardware store and got a "left handed screwdriver" :-p

gosh this thread got so far off topic ... probably only because the Op never returned :(

hopefully through the chitchat, he now understands the difference between digital and analog :smile:

Dave

PS... ohhh and Oz isn't my place of origin, I'm from across the "ditch" from whence the mighty All Blacks come

been in Australia for 14 yrs
 
Last edited:
  • #25
"all blacks"? Is that some table tennis team? Or is it synchronised swimming?
More like synchronised stuffing of the opposition.
I asked for a bucket of steam and was offered a long weight.
 
  • #26
"all blacks"? Is that some table tennis team? Or is it synchronised swimming?

I assume you are teasing ? :smile:

Dave
 
  • #27
The clue is in the second sentence. :smile:
 
  • #28
davenn said:
gosh this thread got so far off topic ... probably only because the Op never returned :(
Even EEs need a little fun. I'm thinking berkeman has let this go on as he is a
analog designer
at heart. :rolleyes:
 
  • #29
I would suggest a pause in replys until we hear back from the OP.
 

Related to Creating an RF Signal using analog methods

1. What is an RF signal?

An RF (Radio Frequency) signal is an electromagnetic wave that is used to transmit information wirelessly. It is commonly used in technologies such as radios, televisions, and wireless communication devices.

2. How is an RF signal created using analog methods?

An RF signal can be created using analog methods by modulating an oscillator circuit with the desired frequency and amplitude. This can be achieved using components such as resistors, capacitors, and inductors.

3. What are the advantages of using analog methods to create an RF signal?

Analog methods for creating an RF signal are generally less expensive and simpler compared to digital methods. They also have a wider frequency range and can be easily integrated into existing analog systems.

4. Are there any limitations to using analog methods for creating an RF signal?

One limitation of using analog methods is that they are more susceptible to noise and interference, which can affect the quality of the RF signal. They also have limited flexibility and cannot be easily reconfigured for different frequencies.

5. How are analog RF signals different from digital RF signals?

Analog RF signals are continuous and can have an infinite number of values, while digital RF signals are discrete and can only have a limited number of values. Analog signals also have a wider frequency range, but digital signals are less susceptible to noise and can be easily manipulated and reconfigured.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
20
Views
721
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
8
Views
910
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
747
Replies
47
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top