Confusion of the scale of contact line dynamics and capillary flow

In summary, the conversation discusses the scale at which capillary flow and contact line dynamics are important, specifically in cases where gravity is removed from the problem. The Washburn's equation is mentioned, which states that the penetration length is proportional to the radius of the capillary tube. There is confusion about the limiting length scale for this equation and how contact angles play a role in driving flow. It is explained that the importance of contact angles varies depending on the system, with larger containers and greater amounts of liquid making them less significant. However, for smaller containers and amounts of liquid, contact angles become more important in determining the rate of flow.
  • #1
mrmudd
1
0
I'm having some trouble getting my head around the scale at which capillary flow and contact line dynamics are important. In the simple case of liquid rise in a capillary tube, a smaller tube will allow for greater rise since a larger height is required to achieve an equal weight of the liquid column to balance the capillary pressure. That's totally fine and makes complete sense.

My problem is when gravity is removed from the problem. Consider now Washburn's equation where the penetration length L is proportional to the radius of the capillary tube. This is where I start to get to confused. I can understand that at small length scales, viscous dissipation will be greater thus slowing down the flow. However, if we assume a very large pipe, say 0.5 meter radius; the rate at which the pipe is filled with liquid due solely to the contact line is no way going to be faster than 1 mm radius tube. I suppose there is a limiting length scale above which Washburn's equation cannot be applied; however, I cannot seem to find it anywhere.

On this note, the scale at which a contact line drives the flow is elusive to me. Consider in zero gravity, a container filled with fine powder and a tiny water droplet. Obviously, the a hydrophilic contact angle will result in the imbibition of water into the pore space between the powder and that effect will dominate the final configuration of liquid in the powder. Now if we scale up the exact problem (still in zero gravity) to something like a swimming pool filled with boulders. The contact angle between the water and the boulder would play very little effect in driving any flow into the space between the boulders. So there has to be some way of quantifying the scale at which contact angles play an important roll. It must include the mass of liquid and surface tension, right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Any insight into this matter would be greatly appreciated! In regards to your question about the scale at which contact angles play an important role in driving flow, it is actually quite complex and varies depending on the system. Generally speaking, the larger the container and the greater the amount of liquid, the less important contact angle is in driving the flow. This is because the gravitational force acting on the liquid is much larger than the surface tension forces at these scales. However, for smaller containers and/or smaller amounts of liquid, the surface tension forces become more significant and the contact angle plays a larger role in driving the flow. In these cases, the contact angle will determine how the liquid spreads across the surface and the rate at which it does so.
 

1. What is the contact line and why is it important in capillary flow?

The contact line is the interface between a liquid and a solid surface. It is important in capillary flow because it determines the shape and behavior of the liquid as it moves along the surface.

2. How does the scale of the contact line affect capillary flow?

The scale of the contact line refers to the length of the contact line relative to the size of the liquid droplet. It can affect capillary flow by influencing the contact angle, which is the angle at which the liquid meets the solid surface. A smaller contact line scale may result in a larger contact angle and slower capillary flow.

3. What is the difference between dynamic and static contact line behavior?

Dynamic contact line behavior refers to the movement of the contact line as the liquid flows, while static contact line behavior refers to the contact line remaining stationary. In capillary flow, the dynamic behavior of the contact line can significantly impact the overall flow rate and behavior of the liquid.

4. How does confusion of the scale of contact line dynamics and capillary flow occur?

Confusion of the scale of contact line dynamics and capillary flow can occur when the length scale of the contact line is not properly considered in relation to the size of the liquid droplet. This can lead to incorrect assumptions about the behavior of the liquid and the dynamics of the contact line.

5. What are some potential applications of understanding contact line dynamics and capillary flow?

Understanding contact line dynamics and capillary flow can have many practical applications, such as improving the efficiency of microfluidic devices, developing more effective coatings for surfaces, and enhancing our understanding of natural phenomena such as raindrop formation and plant water uptake.

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
118
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
770
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
723
  • General Engineering
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top