Compatibility of MWI with probability of outcomes

In summary: Unitary evolution of the wavefunction is assumed to always hold. Not being able to reconstruct the Born rule is simply an open issue with that interpretation.
  • #36
entropy1 said:
COULD you say that the outcome is not determined until observed, and NOT EVEN determined AFTER that because we have the superposition of ALL outcomes?

No. MWI is always deterministic.

The correct way to say it is the way I have already said it.

entropy1 said:
To be speculative

Personal speculations are out of bounds.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
The OP question has been answered and the thread is becoming speculative. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

A MWI and the entangled photon experiment
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
62
Views
1K
I Why do we experience the Born Rule in Many Worlds?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
34
Views
2K
I What does "multiple worlds" in MWI mean?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
20
Views
1K
I Why is this interpretation of MWI wrong?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
13
Views
691
I Binomial distribution of "worlds" in MWI
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
1K
I MWI and interpretation of measurements
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
2K
I What is the true nature of worlds in the Many-Worlds Interpretation?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
11
Views
699
  • Poll
I Is QM generally believed to be able to describe Newtonian mechanics?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
10
Views
208
I The Horrifying Implications of the Many-Worlds Interpretation
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
466
I Measure of existence? (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
721

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top