Comparing Satellite Energy in 160km and 144km Orbits

  • Thread starter krypt0nite
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Gravitation
In summary, the total energy of a 2.00 kg satellite in a 160 km orbit is -6.09x10^7 J, while the total energy of the same satellite in a 144 km orbit is -6.12x10^7 J. The reason for these two different answers is due to the difference in distance between the satellite and the Earth's center. The satellite in the 160 km orbit is further away from the Earth's center compared to the satellite in the 144 km orbit, resulting in a greater total energy. This is because the gravitational potential energy of an object increases as it moves further away from the center of mass.
  • #1
krypt0nite
31
0
Which is larger - the total energy of the 2.00 kg satellite in its 160. km orbit or the total energy in its 144 km orbit. Explain why the two answers are different.

Ok the total energy of 2.00 satellite in 160km orbit is -6.09x10^7 J and the total energy of 2.00 satellite in 144km orbit is -6.12x10^7 J.

How do I do the explaining part? I dont' think its simple as just saying their at different distances. Why is the satellite in the 160km orbit have a greater Etotal than the satellite in the 144km orbit?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Can u show us the resoning (not necessarily the calcuations) that led to the 2 different answers?

Daniel.
 
  • #3


The total energy of a satellite in orbit is determined by its position and velocity, which are affected by the gravitational force of the planet it is orbiting. As the distance between the satellite and the planet changes, the strength of the gravitational force also changes.

In this scenario, the satellite in the 160km orbit is further from the planet compared to the satellite in the 144km orbit. This means that the gravitational force acting on the satellite in the 160km orbit is weaker than the force acting on the satellite in the 144km orbit. As a result, the satellite in the 160km orbit has a lower velocity and therefore a lower kinetic energy compared to the satellite in the 144km orbit.

However, the potential energy of the satellite is directly proportional to its distance from the planet. This means that the satellite in the 160km orbit has a higher potential energy compared to the satellite in the 144km orbit. When these two energies (kinetic and potential) are combined, we get the total energy of the satellite.

Since the potential energy of the satellite in the 160km orbit is higher, it compensates for the lower kinetic energy, resulting in a higher total energy compared to the satellite in the 144km orbit. In other words, the satellite in the 160km orbit has a higher total energy because it is further from the planet and therefore has a higher potential energy.

In conclusion, the difference in total energy between the satellite in the 160km orbit and the satellite in the 144km orbit is due to the difference in their distances from the planet and the resulting difference in their potential energies.
 

Related to Comparing Satellite Energy in 160km and 144km Orbits

1. How does the energy of a satellite change when it orbits at different altitudes?

The energy of a satellite is directly proportional to its altitude, so the higher the altitude, the greater the energy. This is because the potential energy of a satellite increases as it moves farther away from the Earth's surface. Therefore, a satellite in a 160km orbit will have more energy than one in a 144km orbit.

2. Is there a significant difference in energy between a satellite in a 160km and 144km orbit?

Yes, there is a significant difference in energy between these two orbits. A satellite in a 160km orbit will have about 14% more energy than one in a 144km orbit. This difference in energy can impact the satellite's performance and capabilities.

3. How does the speed of a satellite change when it orbits at different altitudes?

The speed of a satellite is inversely proportional to its altitude, so the higher the altitude, the lower the speed. This is because as a satellite moves farther away from the Earth's surface, the force of gravity decreases, causing the satellite to slow down. Therefore, a satellite in a 160km orbit will have a lower speed than one in a 144km orbit.

4. What is the main reason for choosing a satellite orbit at 160km or 144km?

The main reason for choosing a satellite orbit at 160km or 144km is to meet specific mission requirements. A higher altitude orbit may be chosen for longer mission durations, while a lower altitude orbit may be chosen for faster data collection. Other factors such as cost, atmospheric interference, and orbital stability may also play a role in orbit selection.

5. Can a satellite in a 160km orbit be moved to a 144km orbit?

Yes, a satellite in a 160km orbit can be moved to a 144km orbit, but it would require a significant amount of energy and precise maneuvering. This process is known as orbital transfer and is often used to prolong the life of a satellite or adjust its position for better performance. However, it is a complex and expensive operation that is carefully planned and executed by a team of experts.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
883
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top