Compactification of spatial extra dimensions

In summary, the paper discusses compact dimensions and specifically examines Equation 65, which includes a term of 4*pi*n*R in the denominator. The speaker is confused about why it is 4*pi instead of 2*pi and is seeking clarification. The paper explains that the term accounts for the true separation of charges in the compactified extra dimension, which is specific to the Torus geometry. Had the extra dimension been compactified on a circle, the term would be 2*pi*n*R.
  • #1
DuckAmuck
236
40
TL;DR Summary
Looking to understand results of a paper.
Hi everyone,
I am looking at a paper on compact dimensions. Equation 65 makes sense except for the term of 4*pi*n*R in the denominator. Why is it 4*pi and not 2*pi? I cannot rationalize this. Please help. Thank you.
https://arxiv.org/ftp/hep-ph/papers/0609/0609260.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The Coulomb force law needs to be modified such that ##R_n## takes into account the true separation of charges. The separation in the compactified extra dimension is given by this ##4\pi n R## term which is specific to the Torus geometry. If the extra dimension was compactified on a circle you may well have a factor of ##2\pi n R## as you expected.
 

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
31
Views
575
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Back
Top