- Thread starter
- Admin
- #1

http://mathhelpboards.com/math-notes-49/justifying-method-undetermined-coefficients-4839.html

- Thread starter MarkFL
- Start date

- Thread starter
- Admin
- #1

http://mathhelpboards.com/math-notes-49/justifying-method-undetermined-coefficients-4839.html

- Admin
- #2

- Jan 26, 2012

- 4,197

1. In the table, in the $y_{p}(x)$ column for Type I's, an $x^{s}$ seems to have become an $x^{2}$.

2. I would rewrite Equation (3) as follows (you haven't really used operator notation, but have included the test function in your definition of $L$, which is not usual):

$$(3) \quad L[y] \equiv a_nD^{n}+ a_{n-1}D^{n-1}+ \cdots+ a_{1}D+ a_0.$$

You do this later on, so this is more of a consistency thing, I think.

- Thread starter
- Admin
- #3

- Admin
- #4

- Jan 26, 2012

- 4,197

$$L \equiv a_{n}D^{n}+a_{n-1}D^{n-1}+ \dots + a_{1}D + a_{0},$$

or

$$L[y] = \left( a_{n}D^{n}+a_{n-1}D^{n-1}+ \dots + a_{1}D + a_{0} \right)y.$$

- Thread starter
- Admin
- #5

I truly appreciate your suggestions, and feel the post has been improved because of them.