- #36
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 24,775
- 792
Originally posted by Alexander
Markus, please apologise for associating this idea with me.
As you can clearly see from my post about "tired light" it was to show you that YOUR idea of "stretched photons" is wrong (as you said - totally wacko).
So, apologise for putting words I did NOT say in my mouth, ok? And don't do that again. PF is not the right place for personal attacks.
I rarely read your posts but my impression is that whenever I do I am likely to find an error. If I remember correctly:
1. you invoked a global energy conservation law in Gen.Rel. and there is no such law.
2. you claimed the energy lost from CMB went into gravitational energy!
3. you claimed there could be no voltage difference between the wingtips of a plane flying thru vertical magnetic field
4. I believe you also made false assertions about the Hubble law and limitations of recession speed in GR, but I would have to look back to check.
In every thread I can remember where I've had occasion to read your posts, you have made errors and when you are wrong you tend keep adamantly reasserting the false claim.
My views are standard mainstream views. The cosmological redshift is not Doppler. Maybe in Russia or wherever you are words are used differently and it is called "Doppler" and that means something else. But the simplest explanation is that you are just eccentric and opinionated.
I am glad to hear you disavow the "tired light" notion!
Tell me your interpretation of the Hubble law v = H0 D.
In what metric is the distance D measured? At what moment in time? The speed v is the change in what measure of distance?
At what time is the v considered to be measured?
This would be a good test of whether your understanding of what these things mean is an eccentric abberation on your part.
Last edited: