Classical and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation

In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between AC current in a radio transmitter and the production of radio waves. The frequency of the radio waves is linked to the frequency of the AC supply, and can be thought of as oscillations of the electric field within the photon itself. However, trying to understand this phenomenon in terms of individual photons can be complicated and it is generally more useful to think of it in terms of EM waves.
  • #1
Glenn G
113
12
Hi,
So I can get the idea that the ac current in a radio transmitter produces radio waves of the same frequency of the ac supply, just like shaking a slinky sprung up and down but how does this translate into the radio waves as actually coming out as photons and for that matter other than knowing E = hf (so frequency is linked to photon energy is there any way of thinking about what frequency is in this context? Is it oscillations of the electric field within the photon itself. I've heard that thinking of the photon as a little wavelet i.e. Portion of a longer classical wave isn't useful)

Thanks for any guidance,
G.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You don't need quantum mechanics to understand radio waves. Classical EM is perfectly valid for that.
 
  • #3
Hi Dale,
Thanks, I just wondered how to resolve what happens though through a quantum model, What does it mean to define a frequency for a photon other than just E/h does it represent anything?
 
  • #4
Glenn G said:
What does it mean to define a frequency for a photon other than just E/h does it represent anything?

It does. We use the word radio for low frequencies, then microwave, infrared, visible light, and x-rays for photons of increasing frequency.

Edit: Also within the radio band, the frequency of the photons corresponds to the channel on the radio. For example, dial your radio to 90.7 Mhz or 107.9 Mhz.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Thanks anorlunda,
What is your understanding of the concept of frequency with photons, is it just an expression that equals E/h or do you think it actually represents the number of oscillations of an electric field within the photon per second?
 
  • #6
Photons are eigenstates of a Fock space. As such they are not energy eigenstates. So a definite number of photons does not have a definite amount of energy nor a definite frequency. The states produced by a RF antenna are probably better approximated by a coherent state than either a Fock or an energy eigenstate.

It is all a useless exercise in unnecessarily complicating an already complicated phenomenon. Just stick with Maxwell's equations for radio waves.
 
  • #7
Take @Dale 's advice. It is not helpful to think of photons with regard to radios.

Think of EM waves instead. The frequency of the wave determines the radio station. Modulation of the wave (AM or FM) determines the audio signals sent. The power of the radio station determines the strength of those waves. Trying to think of those things one photon at a time just leads you down a big hole of confusion.
 

Related to Classical and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation

1. What is the difference between classical and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation?

The classical interpretation of electromagnetic radiation is based on the wave theory, which describes electromagnetic radiation as a continuous wave that travels through space. On the other hand, the quantum interpretation of electromagnetic radiation is based on the particle theory, which describes electromagnetic radiation as discrete packets of energy called photons.

2. How do classical and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation affect our understanding of the behavior of light?

Classical and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation have different implications for the behavior of light. The wave nature of light in the classical interpretation explains phenomena such as diffraction and interference, while the particle nature of light in the quantum interpretation explains phenomena such as the photoelectric effect and the emission and absorption of light by atoms.

3. Which interpretation is more accurate, classical or quantum?

Both interpretations have been successful in explaining different aspects of electromagnetic radiation. However, the quantum interpretation has been shown to accurately predict certain phenomena that the classical interpretation cannot, such as the photoelectric effect. Therefore, the quantum interpretation is considered to be more accurate.

4. Can classical and quantum interpretations coexist?

Yes, classical and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation can coexist as complementary theories. While the classical interpretation is useful for describing macroscopic phenomena, the quantum interpretation is necessary for understanding the behavior of electromagnetic radiation on a microscopic level.

5. How do classical and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation relate to each other?

The quantum interpretation of electromagnetic radiation is often seen as an extension of the classical interpretation. In fact, the classical theory of electromagnetism can be derived from the quantum theory by considering the macroscopic average behavior of a large number of photons. Therefore, the two interpretations are intimately connected and both are necessary for a complete understanding of electromagnetic radiation.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
787
Replies
6
Views
863
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
327
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
304
Replies
1
Views
444
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
5
Views
714
Back
Top