China Nuclear Power: AP1000 Adoption Analysis

  • Thread starter landscape
  • Start date
  • Tags
    China
In summary, China has adopted the AP-1000 as their main source of nuclear power for the next 30 years. This decision comes with the potential benefits of reduced costs and increased safety due to its advanced design and passive safeguards. The Chinese stand to gain a lot from this trade, as they will have access to the technology at a fraction of the initial cost and potentially be able to market it to other countries in the future. However, the question still remains as to what the speaker's personal opinion is on this trade.
  • #1
landscape
2
0
as we know, China adopt the AP1000 as major plants to provide nuclear power in next 30 years. What do you think about this trade?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not sure what one is after with the question, "What do you think about this trade? "

The AP-1000 is an advanced PWR (1000 MWe). The competitor is AREVA's EPR, which has a capacity of 1600-1700 MW. The attraction for the advanced designs is reduction in components (e.g. valves) and length of piping which in theory reduces capital cost and O&M costs compared to current pants.

My understanding from some involved is that China is getting a great deal, i.e. they are getting the technology for a fraction of the initial cost (they don't need to spend the funds for R&D).
 
  • #3
The other thing about the AP-1000 is that it is a "passive" design (thats what the "P" in the "AP" stands for). The engineered safeguards that function to prevent the core from melting during an accident (eg, ECCS and containment cooling) work by gravity and natural circulation flows; they don't rely on active pumping of fluids (and the associated need for emergency electical power from standby diesel generators). This is supposed to make the plant substantially safer than the currently operating designs. Less complexity = higher reliability = greater safety.

This is a good deal for the Chinese, in the sense that they will be the first to build & operate the new design. I'm betting that they are planning on marketing these to the rest of the world, with suitable "evolutionary" features to bamboozle the Westinghouse lawyers.
 

Related to China Nuclear Power: AP1000 Adoption Analysis

1. What is the AP1000 nuclear reactor and how is it different from other nuclear reactors in China?

The AP1000 is a type of nuclear reactor developed by Westinghouse Electric Company. It is a pressurized water reactor that uses advanced passive safety features to enhance nuclear safety. It is different from other nuclear reactors in China because it has a simplified design, which reduces construction time and costs, and also has a higher level of safety and reliability.

2. How many AP1000 reactors are currently operational in China?

As of 2021, there are four AP1000 reactors that are operational in China. These reactors are located in Sanmen and Haiyang and have a total capacity of 3,428 MW.

3. What is the adoption rate of AP1000 in China compared to other types of nuclear reactors?

The adoption rate of AP1000 in China is relatively high compared to other types of nuclear reactors. It is estimated that by 2030, about 30% of China's nuclear power capacity will be from AP1000 reactors. This is due to the Chinese government's push for cleaner and more reliable energy sources.

4. What are the advantages of adopting AP1000 reactors in China?

There are several advantages of adopting AP1000 reactors in China. These include a simplified design which reduces construction time and costs, higher safety and reliability, and a standardized design which allows for easier maintenance and operation. Additionally, AP1000 reactors have a longer lifespan and lower fuel costs compared to other types of nuclear reactors.

5. What are some potential challenges for the adoption of AP1000 reactors in China?

Some potential challenges for the adoption of AP1000 reactors in China include public concerns about nuclear safety, the high initial investment cost, and the need for skilled workers to operate and maintain the reactors. In addition, there may be political and regulatory hurdles that need to be addressed in order for the adoption of AP1000 reactors to continue at a steady pace in China.

Similar threads

China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST)
    • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Have pulsed fission reactors got any potential in nuclear energy?
    • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
5
Views
894
Exceeding the saturation temperature of coolant on the clad for PWR
    • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
Three Mile Island Netflix Documentary
    • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
22
Views
2K
Radioistope Power Systems (RPS) and Pu-238
    • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
0
Views
687
I Nuclear power plant vs coal power plant efficiency
    • Thermodynamics
Replies
32
Views
887
Nuclear Power Usage: Hear What Others Know.
    • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Can Small Modular Reactors Revitalize Nuclear-Powered Surface Combatants?
    • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
What will be the economic purpose of modular reactors?
    • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
Three mile Island Power Plant to be Shut Down
    • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
29
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top