Charged Spherical Shell and Solid Sphere

In summary, we have an isolated solid sphere and an isolated spherical shell of the same radius R that are charged to the maximum potential. The question is which of the two has more charge. To determine this, we need to calculate the capacitance of both bodies. However, there is no formula for the capacitance of an isolated spherical shell. But, since both bodies are kept at the same potential, the capacitance will be the same for both. Therefore, the charge on both bodies will also be the same. The term "maximum potential" is strange and may need clarification.
  • #1
andyrk
658
5
A spherical shell and a conducting sphere each of radius R are charged to maximum potential. Which of the two has more charge?

My attempt:
Since in a conductor, no charge can reside inside the conductor so all charge is on the surface of the conductor just like the spherical shell. Now : Potential(V)=KQ/R

K and R are same for both. They are charged to maximum potential. Means there is a limit to the amount of charge the spherical shell and the solid conducting sphere can possess. My question is how to determine who can possesses more charge? I think we need to calculate capacitance of a solid sphere and a spherical shell in this. We know the capacitance of an isolated spherical capacitor.But how to calculate the capacitance of a isolated spherical shell?? Please reply soon!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Anybody there?
 
  • #3
What is the maximum potential you are talking about?
 
  • #4
That is not mentioned in the question.
 
  • #5
Well, this is rather strange. However, your observation that all the charge on a conducting sphere is at its surface is correct. Then, can the potential of the sphere be different from the potential of the shell, charges being equal?
 
  • #6
voko said:
Well, this is rather strange. However, your observation that all the charge on a conducting sphere is at its surface is correct. Then, can the potential of the sphere be different from the potential of the shell, charges being equal?

No it can't be. But in the problem it says, which has greater charge. For this I think we need capacitance C for both the bodies. Like for the solid sphere C=4∏εoR

I don't think I have ever heard of capacitance of an isolated spherical shell. If we somehow get that and compare both of them, the one which is greater can be said to have the capacity to have more charge on it. But this is where I got stuck. There isn't any formula for the capacitance of a spherical shell. So if I can't do it this way then is there any other possible way to do this problem?
 
  • #7
Capacitance is defined via charge and potential. If charges are equal, and potentials are equal, too, there is no other option for capacitance.
 
  • #8
voko said:
Capacitance is defined via charge and potential. If charges are equal, and potentials are equal, too, there is no other option for capacitance.

No! Its not necessary that capacitance always involves charge and potential!
http://ta.ramk.fi/~jouko.teeriaho/capac.pdf
 
  • #9
andyrk said:
No! Its not necessary that capacitance always involves charge and potential!
http://ta.ramk.fi/~jouko.teeriaho/capac.pdf

Capacitance is defined via charge and potential, just like the second slide at your link indicates.
 
  • #10
andyrk said:
No it can't be. But in the problem it says, which has greater charge. For this I think we need capacitance C for both the bodies. Like for the solid sphere C=4∏εoR

I don't think I have ever heard of capacitance of an isolated spherical shell. If we somehow get that and compare both of them, the one which is greater can be said to have the capacity to have more charge on it. But this is where I got stuck. There isn't any formula for the capacitance of a spherical shell. So if I can't do it this way then is there any other possible way to do this problem?
OK, so they are both kept at the same potential. And they ask 'which has greater capacitance?' So this is equivalent to 'which has stored greater charge?' right? (since we know C=Q/V). So now, you can either calculate the charge stored, or if you know the capacitance, then just use that.

hint: you can sort of figure out the answer logically. But you could also go through the calculation.
 
  • #11
BruceW said:
OK, so they are both kept at the same potential. And they ask 'which has greater capacitance?' So this is equivalent to 'which has stored greater charge?' right? (since we know C=Q/V). So now, you can either calculate the charge stored, or if you know the capacitance, then just use that.

hint: you can sort of figure out the answer logically. But you could also go through the calculation.

I am not able to sort it out. Tried to think alot. Could you help?
 
  • #12
start by thinking the isolated sphere has charge Q1 and the isolated shell has charge Q2. (which may or may not be the same). Now in both situations, where are the charges, and what is the form of the potential in both situations? From this, what would you say about Q1 and Q2?
 
  • #13
See, they are charged to maximum potential, which we do not know the value of. So we can't say which is greater, Q1 or Q2.?
 
  • #14
As voko pointed out, the term 'maximum potential' is weird. If you don't know what it means you should inquire of your lecturer or whoever as to its meaning. We at PF are telling you it's meaningless in the context of the remainder of the question.

We shall assume it means the potential of the sphere and the shell are the same. It doesn't matter how high the potential is.

One can visualize the meaning of 'capacitance' of an isolated sphere or shell as a capacitor formed by the sphere or inner shell of radius a and an outer shell of infinite radius b. So, as you know, the capacitance of such a system is (1/k)(1/a - 1/b) with k = 1/(4 pi epsilon-sub-zero). For b = infinity we get C = a/k.

So if V is the same for both capacitors (sphere plus infinite outer shell vs. inner shell plus infinite outer shell), then the capacitance is the same and since Q = CV it follows immediately that Q is the same for both capacitors also.
 
  • #15
No..it is not 2 concentric spherical shells. Its an isolated solid sphere and an isolated spherical shell of the same radius R which are charged to the maximum potential. THe formula of capacitance you wrote is of two concentric spherical shells of radii a and b (a>b)..
 
  • #16
andyrk said:
No..it is not 2 concentric spherical shells. Its an isolated solid sphere and an isolated spherical shell of the same radius R which are charged to the maximum potential. THe formula of capacitance you wrote is of two concentric spherical shells of radii a and b (a>b)..

Ah, thank you, I know. What I said was one can visualize a capacitor formed by a sphere of radius a and an outer concentric shell of radius b = infinity.

Or, an inner shell of radius a and again an outer shell of radius b = infinity.

Believe me, it works.
 
  • #17
rude man said:
Ah, thank you, I know. What I said was one can visualize a capacitor formed by a sphere of radius a and an outer concentric shell of radius b = infinity.

Or, an inner shell of radius a and again an outer shell of radius b = infinity.

Believe me, it works.

Oh yes. Thanks. It really works :)
 

Related to Charged Spherical Shell and Solid Sphere

1. What is the difference between a charged spherical shell and a solid sphere?

A charged spherical shell is a thin, hollow sphere with a uniform distribution of charge on its surface, while a solid sphere is a three-dimensional object with a uniform distribution of charge within its volume.

2. How does the electric field differ between a charged spherical shell and a solid sphere?

For a charged spherical shell, the electric field is zero inside the shell and is equal to the charge density divided by the radius of the shell outside the shell. For a solid sphere, the electric field is zero at the center and varies with distance from the center, reaching a maximum at the surface of the sphere.

3. Can a charged spherical shell or solid sphere have a net charge of zero?

Yes, both a charged spherical shell and a solid sphere can have a net charge of zero. In the case of a charged spherical shell, this would mean that the total charge on the surface is equal and opposite, resulting in a net charge of zero. For a solid sphere, this would mean that the positive and negative charges within the sphere cancel each other out, resulting in a net charge of zero.

4. How does the electric potential differ between a charged spherical shell and a solid sphere?

For a charged spherical shell, the electric potential is constant inside the shell and is equal to the potential on the surface of the shell outside the shell. For a solid sphere, the potential varies with distance from the center, reaching a maximum at the surface of the sphere.

5. How can the electric field and potential of a charged spherical shell or solid sphere be calculated?

The electric field and potential can be calculated using the equations for electric field and potential, respectively, for a point charge. For a charged spherical shell, the electric field and potential can also be calculated using Gauss' Law and the concept of electric flux. For a solid sphere, the electric field and potential can be calculated using the superposition principle, by breaking the sphere into small elements and summing their contributions.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
831
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
607
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
374
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
224
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
457
Back
Top